YW, leta ya kwanza, then we can tell you if it a good idea

Last week, YW was a participant in the 9th annual ethics conference in Strathmore University. A most informative conference. Kayamba for Strathmore University. For lack of time, questions were very limited to 1 or 2 after each presentation.

8 Strathmore students presented research papers on Contraception, Abortion and Population Control respectively.

Unfortunately, I could not ask them if hypothetically there are 1 million young people who have reached the age of marrying and bearing offspring but 100,000 choose celibacy. Is it then fair or ethical for the 100,000 to abscond population growth duties and shift this responsibility to the 900,000?

I will never know their thoughts about it.

@ Tycho Your thoughts were audible? (Pun intended.)
@ YW if u ask if it's fair to ABSCOND POPULATION DUTIES, are you implying that there is a target population that is supposed to be achieved and everybody has a duty to take part?
In my opinion, if one chooses to be celibate for noble reasons such Choosing to increase the quality of Population rather than quantity the it's perfectly in order. If it were to be unfair, whom would the unfairness be directed at?

whats this business of referring to your self in third person? are you miguna

So, once upon a time in the distant past YW subscribed to a Dr. David Duke to get his periodic views and updates on zionism. Today, YW is surprised to get an email from Dr. Duke about the up coming US elections.

Whereas YW does not agree with Dr. Dukes past as a senior Ku Klux Klan man, his present is far more agreeable.

Watching what the jews are doing to Palestinians in the name of God is heart wrenching. Before you say the Palestinians shoot rockets into Israel, knowing the sentiment the Jews have for christians will pause the thought and render that thought unspoken.

Back to the US elections, according to Dr. Duke and as viewed by YW, Obama vs Romney, its as good as pinky-pinky-ponky ..... lets-choose-a-president!

Kayambaaa

Longlivity is the way to go. How to have longer lifespans, quality life and controlled birth rates. We are not rats who reproduce rapidly and die at the same rate!

@YW.. Show me your friends and I will show you who you are. Hanging out with that quack, finger pointing at Jews makes me wonder, how often you get intouch with Yesu wako?

Fairness lies on the chooser's tongue.

But each choice carries privileges and responsibilities.

The question on fairness is also the ethical question. And if this is so, then Goodness is 'pro choice'.

But the motives behind choice may be unethical. For example, 'I will not reproduce because I am poor' is unethical because it is a negation of the Man God who can do all things.

It is now about 3 months since YW stopped watching television.

Has his / her life improved? Has not watching the telly played a role in making his / her life happy, the end of all human pursuits?

It seems to be retrogressive, with peers, friends and relatives acquiring better and bigger televisions. It seems to invite stares and whispers and not happiness.

But then again, does YW have to do something only because it will make him / her happy?

There are books to be read, information to be internalized ..... there is so much to do and not enough time!

@Tycho, how can truth be absolute and at the same time relative?

If it is relative, it is not truth but a modification of truth. I am not referring to modifications of truth, but to truth.

Ideally, we modify our identity to conform to the truth, we do not modify the truth to conform to our identity. Thats what you are doing. If the truth says humans will die, then humans will die. There is no other way about it because it is absolute.

Without further ado, what is truth? Pontius also asked this question though he did not wait for an answer.

Today in the morning I found time to take a look at 'my life'. It was a very brief affair. But then it seemed like eternity.

My meditation was specific; it was about my regressions. And I could hear a voice saying, 'The problem is you have always taken yourself as the center'.

And indeed, I could see that all 'my life' has been centered on 'me'.

'Then I should have no center!' I said.

It was brief experience, but I am still looking at it. And now I have just realized that since I am a chooser I must have a center.

'Christ is the center!' I heard Bonhoeffer say.

The Man God is the center! For where is Christ? In my 'heart'? In my mind? And who am I? As long as there's a 'me' and a 'Christ' there are two centers. But can we have two or multiple centers?

There must only be identity.

What is truth? It is a spoken word. And can there be perfect communication? 'Only when there's a perfect conversation'. I'd say.

For conversation implies multiplicity. It also implies shaping perception through collective activity. That is, restructuring relativity. For example, God sending the children of Israel to captivity due to their rebellion, and at the same time raising a prophet among them.

The prophet is stimulating a conversation between the individual sinner and his maker.

Picture the blind man that was healed by Jesus. What can you see? People like trees. And then, What can you see? I can see! I can see!

Would you say, 'how can people look like trees? Are you sure you have gained your sight ama zako zime touch!'