Further to @ Mcreggae's response, perhaps of special note in this matter is the 'defence' entered by the AG on behalf of Govt. - read Kibaki.
It has been reported that Wako actually conceded before the court as to the violation of the constitution on the matter of the nominations!
This should leave the Judges with very litle option, but adjudge the nomination as running counter to the stipulations of the constitution.
My worry is the riducule that the office of the President is getting shuffled its way!!!!
For Kibaki as an individual I would say this serves him right!
We told him during the run up to the referundum that the issue of two centres of power between the promulgation date and the exipiry of the current Parliamentary term needed to be corrected.
He ignored the advice.
That advice was given by his advisers too.
I remember reading in the press that Kiraitu and other politicians advised Kibaki as much.
http://www.wazua.co.ke/f...aspx?g=posts&t=7637
In our thread above we feared this much too!
See our arguments in point 7 - the very last paragraph.
Dunia ni msongamano..