Another new institution ..in the draft is the Salaries and Remuneration Commission, which would set and review salaries and benefits of all state officers – which means that MPs will no longer fix their own salaries (Art.230). And any law passed by Parliament that benefits members of parliament as such (not just because they are also members of the public) could not come into effect until after the following general election (Art. 116(3)) – so that the voters have the chance to throw out the MPs who have benefited themselves in this way before they have reaped the benefit....




Each day I get a better reason to say ....'Yes'

To be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best, night and day, to make you everybody else means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can fight; and never stop fighting. e.e. cummings 1955

never give up on what you believe in. but never shy away from straightforward questions.

soko tele, have you considered that people have heard your view and are not convinced?

I took up fundaahs challenge and went to my shags, it only took a few minutes explaining to women that their man cannot run with another woman and leave them penniless for them to say Yes, Yes , Yes....even the pastor did not know that was the case. He was too stuck up on non-existent clauses.

education, education, education and this thing will pass 80+%.

My hats off to the "Warembo, na Yesu, na Yes" group talking to women in the bundus.

@Fundah

Do you appreciate that there are some disagreeable clauses in the document.

I guess those in No are agreed that there are many good laws in the proposed constitution with which they happy.

So issue here is the annoying sections.

Keeping on explaining about non contested clauses is to miss the point.

Try to convince all and sundry that the offending sections are actually good or suggest a practical way of dealing with them.

Amend later seems not good enough.