The judges did not just wake up and create a case. Somebody felt aggrieved and filed the suit stating that he or she was being discriminated against and the judges agreed. As for timing, the judges heard the case in the normal course of their work. We all know that cases in the High Court now take 5 to 10 years to be decided due to the huge backlog there. The last people that should be besmirched here are the judges.

lets face it, this draft has had many issues....lets take stock.
1) multiple drafts in circulation
2) typos and hanging clauses
3) this ruling.
Why are we seeming like we are forcing things? trying to force a square block in a round slot?
take a breather....breath in..out...in again...go back to the table. the PSC agreed in 2 weeks. i am sure we can agree in the same period. No need to hurry things.

Ata waikizima taa....

I have never used Thika road so I won't pay those taxes. I have no babies in Kenya so I won't pay for the children's court. that argument doesn't deserve a reply.

I am still waiting for someone who can explain to me in clear english how a court can say something in the constitution I really hate is illegal. The constitution is the supreme law of the land, how can a judge decide it is illegal. Under what authority. His being in the court is itself due to the constitution that he is saying is illegal.

Maajabu ya Musa haya. Some of these things can only happen in kenya.

@nanfor1, but Thika road does not expressly say i should not use it (its a public road) or say it shall be used by only a certain group of people.
its clear as day that this law is a discriminatory law for all religions and cultures that have their ways of life. in that everyone else has to live in 45(4) except MUSLIMS who can live there and else where.
Its discriminatory.