Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Science of social networks
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:@symbols, how is it possible to understand that no proof is available? What does a proof imply?
Again, unity isn't opposed to contradiction. In fact, contradiction implies unity.
Lol, when is a proof possible? And you are yet to show me Big brother is me or morality is mathematics  Red herring, @symbols. At least the post is asking whether you can identify a proof if you see one. Please read carefully. It is you who should read carefully.I didn't say there wasn't any proof,I said we can't prove it. Define proof and I'll answer your question.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:@symbols, how is it possible to understand that no proof is available? What does a proof imply?
Again, unity isn't opposed to contradiction. In fact, contradiction implies unity.
Lol, when is a proof possible? And you are yet to show me Big brother is me or morality is mathematics Red herring, @symbols. At least the post is asking whether you can identify a proof if you see one. Please read carefully. It is you who should read carefully.I didn't say there wasn't any proof,I said we can't prove it. Define proof and I'll answer your question. Lol, if you know something can't be proven, then you must know how a proof looks like. So my question on my post, is how does a proof look like? You asking me to define a proof is asking me what am asking you.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:@symbols, how is it possible to understand that no proof is available? What does a proof imply?
Again, unity isn't opposed to contradiction. In fact, contradiction implies unity.
Lol, when is a proof possible? And you are yet to show me Big brother is me or morality is mathematics Red herring, @symbols. At least the post is asking whether you can identify a proof if you see one. Please read carefully. It is you who should read carefully.I didn't say there wasn't any proof,I said we can't prove it. Define proof and I'll answer your question. Lol, if you know something can't be proven, then you must know how a proof looks like. So my question on my post, is how does a proof look like? You asking me to define a proof is asking me what am asking you. Ok  So you're asking me to prove to you my views and experiences.I am saying I can't prove it.It's like me asking you to show me a mind? How can I prove that?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:@symbols, how is it possible to understand that no proof is available? What does a proof imply?
Again, unity isn't opposed to contradiction. In fact, contradiction implies unity.
Lol, when is a proof possible? And you are yet to show me Big brother is me or morality is mathematics Red herring, @symbols. At least the post is asking whether you can identify a proof if you see one. Please read carefully. It is you who should read carefully.I didn't say there wasn't any proof,I said we can't prove it. Define proof and I'll answer your question. Lol, if you know something can't be proven, then you must know how a proof looks like. So my question on my post, is how does a proof look like? You asking me to define a proof is asking me what am asking you. Ok So you're asking me to prove to you my views and experiences.I am saying I can't prove it.It's like me asking you to show me a mind? How can I prove that? I am not asking you to prove your views and experience now. Am asking you to outline how a proof looks like.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 4/20/2012 Posts: 888
|
The black team (Babu's team)and the 2 pm gang are conspicuously absent in this thread.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:@symbols, how is it possible to understand that no proof is available? What does a proof imply?
Again, unity isn't opposed to contradiction. In fact, contradiction implies unity.
Lol, when is a proof possible? And you are yet to show me Big brother is me or morality is mathematics Red herring, @symbols. At least the post is asking whether you can identify a proof if you see one. Please read carefully. It is you who should read carefully.I didn't say there wasn't any proof,I said we can't prove it. Define proof and I'll answer your question. Lol, if you know something can't be proven, then you must know how a proof looks like. So my question on my post, is how does a proof look like? You asking me to define a proof is asking me what am asking you. Ok So you're asking me to prove to you my views and experiences.I am saying I can't prove it.It's like me asking you to show me a mind? How can I prove that? I am not asking you to prove your views and experience now. Am asking you to outline how a proof looks like. Proof of what?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:@symbols, how is it possible to understand that no proof is available? What does a proof imply?
Again, unity isn't opposed to contradiction. In fact, contradiction implies unity.
Lol, when is a proof possible? And you are yet to show me Big brother is me or morality is mathematics Red herring, @symbols. At least the post is asking whether you can identify a proof if you see one. Please read carefully. It is you who should read carefully.I didn't say there wasn't any proof,I said we can't prove it. Define proof and I'll answer your question. Lol, if you know something can't be proven, then you must know how a proof looks like. So my question on my post, is how does a proof look like? You asking me to define a proof is asking me what am asking you. Ok So you're asking me to prove to you my views and experiences.I am saying I can't prove it.It's like me asking you to show me a mind? How can I prove that? I am not asking you to prove your views and experience now. Am asking you to outline how a proof looks like. Proof of what? Proof of what? Of anything capable of being proven.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:@symbols, how is it possible to understand that no proof is available? What does a proof imply?
Again, unity isn't opposed to contradiction. In fact, contradiction implies unity.
Lol, when is a proof possible? And you are yet to show me Big brother is me or morality is mathematics Red herring, @symbols. At least the post is asking whether you can identify a proof if you see one. Please read carefully. It is you who should read carefully.I didn't say there wasn't any proof,I said we can't prove it. Define proof and I'll answer your question. Lol, if you know something can't be proven, then you must know how a proof looks like. So my question on my post, is how does a proof look like? You asking me to define a proof is asking me what am asking you. Ok So you're asking me to prove to you my views and experiences.I am saying I can't prove it.It's like me asking you to show me a mind? How can I prove that? I am not asking you to prove your views and experience now. Am asking you to outline how a proof looks like. Proof of what? Proof of what? Of anything capable of being proven. 1+1=2
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:@symbols, how is it possible to understand that no proof is available? What does a proof imply?
Again, unity isn't opposed to contradiction. In fact, contradiction implies unity.
Lol, when is a proof possible? And you are yet to show me Big brother is me or morality is mathematics Red herring, @symbols. At least the post is asking whether you can identify a proof if you see one. Please read carefully. It is you who should read carefully.I didn't say there wasn't any proof,I said we can't prove it. Define proof and I'll answer your question. Lol, if you know something can't be proven, then you must know how a proof looks like. So my question on my post, is how does a proof look like? You asking me to define a proof is asking me what am asking you. Ok So you're asking me to prove to you my views and experiences.I am saying I can't prove it.It's like me asking you to show me a mind? How can I prove that? I am not asking you to prove your views and experience now. Am asking you to outline how a proof looks like. Proof of what? Proof of what? Of anything capable of being proven. 1+1=2 @Symbols, how is the statement 1+1= 2, a proof? Lol, it's like someone asking what a house is, and you answering; 'White house'.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:@symbols, how is it possible to understand that no proof is available? What does a proof imply?
Again, unity isn't opposed to contradiction. In fact, contradiction implies unity.
Lol, when is a proof possible? And you are yet to show me Big brother is me or morality is mathematics Red herring, @symbols. At least the post is asking whether you can identify a proof if you see one. Please read carefully. It is you who should read carefully.I didn't say there wasn't any proof,I said we can't prove it. Define proof and I'll answer your question. Lol, if you know something can't be proven, then you must know how a proof looks like. So my question on my post, is how does a proof look like? You asking me to define a proof is asking me what am asking you. Ok So you're asking me to prove to you my views and experiences.I am saying I can't prove it.It's like me asking you to show me a mind? How can I prove that? I am not asking you to prove your views and experience now. Am asking you to outline how a proof looks like. Proof of what? Proof of what? Of anything capable of being proven. 1+1=2 @Symbols, how is the statement 1+1= 2, a proof? Lol, it's like someone asking what a house is, and you answering; 'White house'.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Assange can't say, that all internet use is for suppression. Can he?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:Assange can't say, that all internet use is for suppression. Can he? Did he say that?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:Assange can't say, that all internet use is for suppression. Can he? Did he say that? @symbols, am asking you whether he CAN say that all use of the internet is for suppression. Am neither quoting nor reporting. Am asking a hypothetical question.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:Assange can't say, that all internet use is for suppression. Can he? Did he say that? @symbols, am asking you whether he CAN say that all use of the internet is for suppression. Am neither quoting nor reporting. Am asking a hypothetical question. He can.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:Assange can't say, that all internet use is for suppression. Can he? Did he say that? @symbols, am asking you whether he CAN say that all use of the internet is for suppression. Am neither quoting nor reporting. Am asking a hypothetical question. He can. Would he be justified?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:Assange can't say, that all internet use is for suppression. Can he? Did he say that? @symbols, am asking you whether he CAN say that all use of the internet is for suppression. Am neither quoting nor reporting. Am asking a hypothetical question. He can. Would he be justified? I don't know.What do you think?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:Assange can't say, that all internet use is for suppression. Can he? Did he say that? @symbols, am asking you whether he CAN say that all use of the internet is for suppression. Am neither quoting nor reporting. Am asking a hypothetical question. He can. Would he be justified? I don't know.What do you think? He wouldn't.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Press conferences too are also fast becoming tools of suppression http://m.aljazeera.com/story/2014716114935957662
So are other media programs, newspapers, schools, religions and the like. If humans can now use almost anything to 'suppress' or 'oppress' others, shouldn't 'responsible' citizens who wish to uphold freedom and liberty work out engaging solutions that can promote peace, and freedom across societies? Shouldn't the science of social networks be used for such purposes?
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
I have tried to introduce Keanu Reeves's Matrix movie into this discussion of networking for the specific reason it dealt with the illusory human perception of reality which is based on the habitual day to day choices people make in the world they live in and the need to break free from "this" world and make new choices.
I am saddened that my spark has not kindled any fire.
Ah!
So I will let it be.
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Science of social networks
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|