obiero wrote:VituVingiSana wrote:1bn or 10bn. A loss is a loss. This is not about a loss that happens once in a while. This is about losses that occur without fail. Year after year. Plus there's the 35bn NEGATIVE equity.
I want KQ to be profitable. It has a significant role to play in our economy BUT not if it is subsidized year in, year out.
Hii subsidy unasema ndio ipi tena.. The last one was the last one
I do hope that is the case. Let's wait and see. BTW, even the "cheap" loan is an ongoing subsidy. GoK borrows at 13% and lends to KQ at 13% or less is a subsidy.
The best way out is for a KQ-in-bankruptcy [yes, shareholders will be wiped out] and one that retains the logo/name but not the debts, greedy employees or "old" management.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett