Am wrote:Pedes wrote:mkenyan wrote:murchr wrote:Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:This Wangusi guy has jianikad too much. He may be right but at the same time he is too emotional about the whole thing and seems to be unwilling to compromise.
At some point the politicians and the media houses will sit to compromise involving the 3 media houses releasing their content to the other carriers but in return they will demand a big enough head to save face. It will be Wangusi's, coz it cant be the CA or any person higher.
Explain how. Wangusi has the backing of law. The thing went to the SUPREME COURT. Explain like you'd do to a 2 year old.
and to add on that, he appears to have currently have the backing of the executive as well.
Plus a sizable number of citizens
Even Consensus by wazuans in the thread....Its so obvious for a person with no clue to Judge who could be right or wrong in this whole saga. @Obi toa Goggles.
Yawa Some things are too obvious.
I do think Wangusi is right, he is however too aggressive and possibly miscalculated the resolve of the monied media owners. I can bet he never expected the stations to stay off as long as they have. I am just thinking about the "Art of War", or easier for some here the game of chess, you sacrifice a bishop, castle to get a queen.
A good chunk of Kenyans have their only source of entertainment as the daily news and I am sure the politicians are who get off seing themselves being ar*es on TV are now getting impatient. Battles have casualties whether you win or lose, Wangusi so happens to be in the thick of it, at the point of the spear. I am just saying.
"The purpose of bureaucracy is to compensate for incompetence and lack of discipline." James Collins