Extraterrestrial wrote:chiaroscuro wrote:kawi254 wrote:Extraterrestrial wrote:kawi254 wrote:Lifeline tariff was political Uhurunomics.
Kenya Power is selling power below cost...not sustainable.
Actually the net cost per unit in FY17/18 was Sh6.06. It is the cost of operations that is ballooning and which they are desperately trying to cover.
The Feed In Tariff (FiT) (US $/Kwh) for project above 10MW:
Hydro = 0.0825 (Kengen is paid much less for Hydro)
Wind = 0.11
Geothermal = 0.088
With Geothermal making bulk of power produced at an average of KES 9/Kwh + Transmission costs + KPLC margin + Expensive thermal costs (thermal PPAs not public) then i doubt net cost can be below KES 10/Kwh .
In-fact the bulk power purchased by large industries/consumers at around KES 8/Kwh is also below cost. Looks like the middle class subsidize everyone i.e large manufactures + Lifeline consumers.
Simple math: Pick up latest KPLC annual report [https://www.kplc.co.ke/AR2018/KPLC%20Annual%20Report%2017_12_2018_Wed.pdf]. Check for total units sold. Check for power purchase costs. Divide.
SH84bn / 7.9bn kWh = Sh10.63/kWhIt's really that simple!
Use the figure for non-fuel costs.
Small correction. Units sold is less power transmission losses. Correct figure is (Power Purchase costs/Units bought)
KShs 84.1 bn / 9,962 GWh = Sh8.44/kWh <-- Note 7. Power Purchase costs
Using Non-fuel costs in 2018 for OrPower 4 Inc (geothermal) who don't have a fuel cost part.
Power Purchase cost/Units bought: KShs 11,438,108,000 /1,185 Gwh = KShs 9.65/KwhPoint is KPLC Power Purchase costs have increased. While in 2018 cheap Hydro will subsidize their cost in 2019 there is a big bump of 310MW from LTWP at around Sh 11/Kwh + Ketraco delays penalties in connecting LTWP + increased thermal due to reduced hydrology in 2019 (failed rains). The money has to come from somewhere. If GoK does not plug in to subsidize Lifeline + industries KPLC is not sustainable.