Mathematics is the closest thing we have to a Universal language. An equation is an equation is an equation.

The other condition that Plato/Aristotle and others emphasized is observation as a requirement for validating scientific inquiry. The idea is, if conditions are similar, what you observe and what I observe should be the same.

Quantum mechanics blew both of these notions out of the water by arguing that, while the process of mathematics and observation can be pined down, the results can not - they are dependent on interpretation. Who interprets? The observer. From here making the case that the observer creates the reality he then observes is easy.

And now I am happy to take a break. For the next few days I'll be fully immersed in the political drama we have mounted. See you after the show.

And this one too: http://citeseerx.ist.psu...mp;rep=rep1&type=pdf

Thank you Tycho. Let me take my time to go through these links.

Meanwhile I have a question for you.

In a spaceless, timeless quantum construct, does the speed of light matter?

The greatest art, the greatest science is alchemy.

Let's all go to the garden, and partake of the fruit of the tree of life.

After all, what is knowledge for, but to eat from this tree? All learning can only have this object. All relationships, all works point to this tree.

@Wakanyugi, your questions have plagued me since you posted and I think that not responding won't do me any favor.

In my opinion,

1. Space and time are not one and the same. They are only manifested simultaneously. Evidence can be provided using an object oriented model where objects relate according to time while the forms behind the object aren't timed but exist. Where do they exist?

2. The speed of light is constant in a vacuum, but do vacuums exist? In my opinion vacuums don't exist, therefore the speed of light is hardly ever constant or because of uniformity of matter in the universe the speed of light appears to be constant on any system being considered. I go for the latter opinion.

3. The observer in quantum mechanics and the observer in relativity may not be the one and the same considering differences in the planes of observation involved and the laws inherent in the planes.

Quantum mechanics seems to be strongest on what I call the 'astral plane' while relativity appears to be on the 'physical plane'. The former deals with forms and the latter, with objects.