It was terrorism Inside Africa!

What they did inside Congo, inside Africa, what they did in South Africa, the Boers from Germany who systematically slaughtered and displaced and enslaved 39,000,000 (39M) people. And held that position in what was known as the Apartheid. And the world, the United Nations accepted it all the way until few years.

Aprtheid became acceptable form of Governance in the world. And how did it come about? The act of inflicting, of systematic attacks, and assaults upon individuals and places within human population with the purpose of instilling fear and tremour. What was that definition? TERRORISM

What about Australia as mentioned by @jokes? Those people they think they are natives. Read the history. From Sydney, 50 miles in any direction, you'll find a settlement of natives who are called "Aboriginal". Very nice complicated word.

They are the people who owned this land and have more right to the land of Australia than anyone else (according to provisions of God). Not provisions of United Nations. Not provisions of those who went there and displaced them systematically and replaced them.

If anyone dares and study what has happened to these Aboriginals (and people of Congo and negroid at large) you'll cry if you have any feelings inside of you.

On the Aboriginal, how many of them were displaced? Whooping 16,000,000 (16M). What is the definition of that? And what was that definition before Uncle Sam president changed the meaning in the last 3 decades? TERRORISM

We can engage a bit historically...

Do you remember the invasion of South America by Spanish and Portuguese in 18th century? They slaughtered, systematically, distablised and eliminated 56,000,000 (56M people) in order to take control of that continent. And they are still holding that continent until today. How did they do it? After Christopher Columbus came back, and claimed that land for his Spanish King Fardinand & wife Isabela, they sent more ships. And within 150 years, they distablished, massacred, killed, liquidated, eliminated, 89,000,000 (89M) native Indians (as they call them Red Indians) to take control of what they call the new world. And what did they do? They inflicted systematic attacks and assaults, with their weapons and their ships, within human population. And what do you call this?

@Alph Doti, I'm touched by the stories you've shared with us, and the revolutionary recommendations you make.

Because that was a response to my questions, I'll try to simplify your answer in terms of my questions.

You believe that it's a simple and clear fact, that Africans have been deliberately 'terrorized' and enslaved by 'Whites' or all non-Africans. And that left to themselves, Africans are capable of having an ideal life of freedom, under a socialist system.

Your argument may imply that the African is a special kind of human immune from the proclivities of the 'Whites'. A 'we' versus 'them' kind of mentality...

Now my questions are; how true is this argument? How was it formed?

Think about your prescription: how critical is it? Think about how socialism is faring in Europe... would socialism suffice in our times?

To me these are very contentious issues that ask us to go beyond our sensibilities. The attitudes expressed here so far, only serve to entrench the oppressive system we are crying about. Why? Because they veer away from the truly significant issues.