kaka2za wrote:
You are very lucky if your earnings are commensurate to what you generate for your employer.
Following your logic parking attendants should be earning huge salaries.
You can't be serious.
Parking attendants do not generate any money at all. If Ojwang was a nondescript parking attendant, no one would go to park because of him.
On the other hand Ojwang and his gang generated a lot of money for KBC. People watched vitimbi specifically because of Ojwang and his gang. If Ojwang was not there, the vitimbi audience would have been much lower. Which means KBC would make less money from advertizing. As you know, advertizing costs are based on how large the audience is for a TV program. The higher the TV audience for a program, the more a company has to pay KBC to advertize within that program.
This is why I say Ojwang and his gang generated a lot of advertizing revenue for KBC.
In America for example, the best TV actors are able to negotiate deals based on how much revenue they generate. Thus Gerry Seinfeld was offered US $ 4 million per episode. While his parking attendant likely made minimum wage. This is because Seinfeld's show is the most popular of all time and generated a huge amount of advertizing revenue for NBC.
Musicians also make money based on how much they generate. If you sell more records, you recording company pays you more. If you sell more concert tickets, then organizers pay you more.
So you are wrong when you say people rarely make the amount of money they generate. What you said may be true in the corporate world. But In the entertainment world, people do make money based on how much they generate unless they are being exploited and have no other options.