@lonest! we can talk about misconceptions you have.

First, you are trying to change the topic, about the members of church who introduce things which are not part of the scripture revealed by God. And I said we've seen this habit has been going on since time immemorial.

Secondly, I never pick a story from the cutter-press and say this is in the Bible. I never, accuse anyone of things written by enemies. I always try to cahllenge you as Christian based on what is in the Bible. Don't I? So why pick garbage and come claim to be Islamic?

Anyway, let me respond to your allegations
This story you have narrated, you get this from history books, which have been written. The book lied that, one time the Prophet was visiting the house of Zaid, who was his adopted son, who was a slave and had been liberated. The book says when he visited his house, and Zainab was changing her clothes, and prophet felt for her. And the story says when Zaid heard that prophet had visited his house, so he wanted to divorce his wife. This incident is recorded like that.

@lonest! this incident is against the Quran
Not only is it against the Quran, but the book itself which carries this story has been written by a person who has been regarded as a absolute lier.

The writer has not been regarded as trustworthy at all. Therefore, this story can never be accepted at all.

That person has been called a lier
He had no basis and not trustworthy.

I hope you can be satisfied with my answer, because your story is not in authentic source of Islam. It is not in Quran, and it is not in authentic Hadith. So where you get it, it is not from Islam.

who is changing the topic? You should have let it be how it was before you brought your diversions!

Then you start crying we are attacking your religion and claiming that you never attack the Christian faith without provocation

How is it against the qur'an?

First, I said what this church PCEA/PCUSA is doing is terrible, they are actually trying to do what the early scholars did, they have been changing the Bible as they willed.

Then, you came fighting and said it's interpretation. I asked you to tell me what interpretation. You did not explain the interpretation issue, but you did about turn and ask to be shown which verses in particular have been expunged from these versions?

I gave you the verses. What did you do? You didn't see the verses, infact, you did another 360 and went to consult your friends, the liars to find dirt and lies about Islam.

You didn't focus on the debate about the different Bible versions. The current Bible in your hands is totally different from the "ancient manuscripts".

Even your fellow Christian @muriel has told you this in his post #31

I always remain focused on the debate. I use facts. I use the Bible. I use your scholars of the church. I don't go bringing Mr. Rushdi stuff and say this is your church. I use real church like PCEA and so called PCUSA.

So even you, if you want to debate, quote Islam, quote the Quran, quote the authentic hadith. Don't go dig stuff done by your church to malign Islam and say this is Islam.

Sawa?

@Lonest! Al-Tabari is not a reliable source of information to learn about the Prophet, or Islam for that matter.

If you want to learn about or critic Islam, refer at authentic source of Islam, the Quran and Hadith. If you find anything wrong there, then let me know.

But, you find that all the critics of Islam, the Christian missionaries who attack Islam always quote from Al-Tabari. They quote his writings about Islam and about prophet Muhammad (pbuh), about the companions, about pre-Islamic Arabia.

He actually wrote entire volume, a book about history; both Islamic and Biblical histories.

The problem with Al-Tabari history is that it is not reliable. In fact Al_Tabari warned people at the beginning of his book that his book is filled with weak, un-authentic narrations.

And this is the problem with critics of Islam.
They have not really studied Islam. They think they have, but in reality they have not.

Muslims are aware about this, and they warn other Muslims not to be impressed by the writings of Al-Tabari. Muslims also know that they should not take critics of Islam seriously who use Al-Tabari as their reference.