wazua Sat, May 9, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

12 Pages«<34567>»
The joy of knowing that I'm a Killer
tycho
#41 Posted : Monday, December 09, 2013 3:41:15 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Muriel wrote:
tycho wrote:
Muriel wrote:

Where were we?

Ah! Yes! Cain!

Helena P. Blavatsky talks about in her 'Secret Doctrine' of a 'key' to Genesis.

I see you have read it.


I found the book boring to read. But I know what Blavatsky is about. Why do other people concern you here. Put yourself on the scales.



lol.

Today you have woken for people?

If I put myself on the scales, someone will measure me.

My question is why should he measure me and not me measuring him?


If you put your Self on the scales, you end up measuring your 'self'. Why you should measure yourself is 'self evident'.
tycho
#42 Posted : Monday, December 09, 2013 3:49:24 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Muriel wrote:
kysse wrote:
Muriel wrote:
kysse wrote:
Muriel wrote:
If I put myself on the scales, someone will measure me.

My question is why should he measure me and not me measuring him?


because the person giving you the scales has issues with himself and wants to see himself through you.You are his mirror or some gauge for comparison.
But why should you be the standard yet you have weaknesses like everybody else?



Yes,

Maybe he was rained on in the morning. lol.



@ Muriel wacha uchokozi ,you are the rained on one. But isn't that how we all are?

Evaluating others to discover ourselves? Others are our mirror.



Ok ,,,,,,, sorry Tycho.

But that book, the one I mentioned, is like the kernel of this philosophy.

The 'key' hence enables the understanding of the phrase 'the joy of knowing that I'm a killer' and the rebuilding of the 'tower of the divine union'.




The 'kernel of philosophy' isn't in any book save the one you're writing. Otherwise, if it were about quoting others then the list will never end. Even Blavatsky quotes others. So it's better to quote yourself. Either you are personally interested in Cain or not.
Muriel
#43 Posted : Monday, December 09, 2013 4:00:39 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 11/19/2009
Posts: 3,142
kysse wrote:
Muriel wrote:

Ok ,,,,,,, sorry Tycho. Like seriously Muriel?? d'oh!

But that book, the one I mentioned, is like the kernel of this philosophy.

The 'key' hence enables the understanding of the phrase 'the joy of knowing that I'm a killer' and the rebuilding of the 'tower of the divine union'.




I ain't talking books lol. leave that to tycho and yourself.Laughing out loudly


lol, Kysse,

The 'sorry' was for him for the uchokosi of him.

But the rest I meant for you. I want to interest you in the book for I know you can withstand it.

Come with me and see.
Muriel
#44 Posted : Monday, December 09, 2013 4:03:48 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 11/19/2009
Posts: 3,142
tycho wrote:
Muriel wrote:
kysse wrote:
Muriel wrote:
kysse wrote:
Muriel wrote:
If I put myself on the scales, someone will measure me.

My question is why should he measure me and not me measuring him?


because the person giving you the scales has issues with himself and wants to see himself through you.You are his mirror or some gauge for comparison.
But why should you be the standard yet you have weaknesses like everybody else?



Yes,

Maybe he was rained on in the morning. lol.



@ Muriel wacha uchokozi ,you are the rained on one. But isn't that how we all are?

Evaluating others to discover ourselves? Others are our mirror.



Ok ,,,,,,, sorry Tycho.

But that book, the one I mentioned, is like the kernel of this philosophy.

The 'key' hence enables the understanding of the phrase 'the joy of knowing that I'm a killer' and the rebuilding of the 'tower of the divine union'.




The 'kernel of philosophy' isn't in any book save the one you're writing. Otherwise, if it were about quoting others then the list will never end. Even Blavatsky quotes others. So it's better to quote yourself. Either you are personally interested in Cain or not.


But I am comfortable having my 'self' who is also 'someone' on the scale and me outside doing the measuring.

But when I say 'kernel of this philosophy' I am not talking about any other everyday ordinary philosophy like in 'kernel of philosophy'.

I am talking about 'this' philosophy.

'This' philosophy is a specific philosophy. That is why I don't understand why you want to talk about Madam Blavatsky instead of 'the' philosophy she talks about. I am not interested in Madam Blavatsky 'her' self or 'my' self.

'The' philosophy has very direct bearing on Cain.

That's why I have introduced it.
Muriel
#45 Posted : Monday, December 09, 2013 4:10:11 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 11/19/2009
Posts: 3,142
symbols wrote:
If it's the unnameable I am happy.


We name it first.
kysse
#46 Posted : Monday, December 09, 2013 4:15:26 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 1/17/2013
Posts: 4,693
Location: Earth
Muriel wrote:

But the rest I meant for you. I want to interest you in the book for I know you can withstand it.

Come with me and see.


Tell me about the book-only if its positive
tycho
#47 Posted : Monday, December 09, 2013 4:24:10 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
kysse wrote:
Tycho was Hitler brave or Fearful?

Do people who insult/attack/abuse others do so out of fear or bravery?

Have you ever touched a soul in a positive way?

If you died today do you think you will be missed by those around you or those you touched?

Of what value are you to your surrounding or to the people who matter.



If a child refuses to cry upon birth, then the hearts of those around can't be touched in a positive way. They will cry, and consoling them wouldn't be easy.

But if the baby cries, everyone rejoices, cards are sent, visits, pats on the back. . . but why is the baby crying? Because it fears.

Why are the others rejoicing? Because they fear.

And from the moment of birth, a child is good and sweet as long as it expresses it's fear in accord with those who wield the most power.

Touching a persons heart in Babylon means affirming Babylon, the kingdom of fear.

In this kingdom, bravery is the other side of fear. Hitler sought to conquer, but others proved to be stronger; but in the end someone won, and ruled. Fear building on fear.

So how can one create positive effect by spreading fear, when all should be love? Love is the absence of fear.

It's about laughing with a new born baby. I am yet to do this.







symbols
#48 Posted : Monday, December 09, 2013 4:33:45 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/19/2013
Posts: 2,552
Muriel wrote:
symbols wrote:
If it's the unnameable I am happy.


We name it first.


You name it with what language?
tycho
#49 Posted : Monday, December 09, 2013 4:34:46 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Muriel wrote:
tycho wrote:
Muriel wrote:
kysse wrote:
Muriel wrote:
kysse wrote:
Muriel wrote:
If I put myself on the scales, someone will measure me.

My question is why should he measure me and not me measuring him?


because the person giving you the scales has issues with himself and wants to see himself through you.You are his mirror or some gauge for comparison.
But why should you be the standard yet you have weaknesses like everybody else?



Yes,

Maybe he was rained on in the morning. lol.



@ Muriel wacha uchokozi ,you are the rained on one. But isn't that how we all are?

Evaluating others to discover ourselves? Others are our mirror.



Ok ,,,,,,, sorry Tycho.

But that book, the one I mentioned, is like the kernel of this philosophy.

The 'key' hence enables the understanding of the phrase 'the joy of knowing that I'm a killer' and the rebuilding of the 'tower of the divine union'.




The 'kernel of philosophy' isn't in any book save the one you're writing. Otherwise, if it were about quoting others then the list will never end. Even Blavatsky quotes others. So it's better to quote yourself. Either you are personally interested in Cain or not.


But I am comfortable having my 'self' who is also 'someone' on the scale and me outside doing the measuring.

But when I say 'kernel of this philosophy' I am not talking about any other everyday ordinary philosophy like in 'kernel of philosophy'.

I am talking about 'this' philosophy.

'This' philosophy is a specific philosophy. That is why I don't understand why you want to talk about Madam Blavatsky instead of 'the' philosophy she talks about. I am not interested in Madam Blavatsky 'her' self or 'my' self.

'The' philosophy has very direct bearing on Cain.

That's why I have introduced it.


Am not talking about Blavatsky, am talking about my Self. You can quote her if you like in your responses. As for me I am terribly engrossed by my thoughts. So don't make me start opening a book I have no interest in.

And there's nothing like 'this philosophy'. I have even changed my definition of 'Philosophy'. So when you say 'this philosophy' I SMH.
kysse
#50 Posted : Monday, December 09, 2013 4:37:44 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 1/17/2013
Posts: 4,693
Location: Earth
let me take a back seat and just listen.

12 Pages«<34567>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.