No. I haven't read the books. But I checked on them and I found some treasure. Like, the idea of reincarnation, I just saw it fade out of relevance.

How is it possible that two different people, seperated in spacetime have similar thoughts or even personalities? We like to think we are unique as individuals, but experience has proven my bias wrong. Personalities have patterns to the very 'least of symbols'. And patterns mean information templates or 'morphogenetic' systems that are linked to what I may call a 'human domain', which in turn entails 'everything'. That is, everything is linked to everything in an information network that travels very very fast. To and fro.

And all this cosmic data is energy, and is intelligent in that it's goal is to preserve and conserve itself always.

Being, is a 'data instance' or a pattern instance, but there are many data instances, which can be acquired or experienced. One only has to reach for them.

So what links me to 'your writer are the questions we'd like answered. And others before sought to answer these questions; and their answers are stored in quantum packets. If you sync with their frequencies then you can share the data sets.

Therefore one can be whoever he chooses to be at any time, with minimum physical motion. Like in a dream. Life is a cosmic dream, and Man is the dreamer. The grand architect.

Death, somehow, is so easily conquered. In fact, there's no death. Knowing isn't just remembering, but creating. Becoming.

Then everyone is completely unique as each individual would be subject to different experiences even though based on the same template.

Becoming what and from what?

Completely unique when information is shared? All experience is shared, and therefore not unique or 'exclusive'.

'From what to what'? All symbolic interaction involves revealing and concealing. The concealment is potential energy. Becoming is experiencing redefinition, ascent of power.

Emotion and feeling isn't linear, or easy to determine. For example, honor comes with guilt, but it's often difficult to express the guilt openly. Many a times the guilt may express itself in ways that the beholder isn't conscious of.

Logic is conscious ordering, but what is subconscious ordering. Power lies in both, but most significantly in the latter.

Perhaps you need to check on Bertrand Russell's thoughts on Wittgenstein's 'Tractatus logico philosophicus'. Logic must have a regression of meaning into the sea of the indefinite, and new language levels and systems of interaction must be found or used.

That impulse, or need; the decision to convert nothing to something, the power behind the word, is the ultimate power. The shaper and chooser of logic. The user of logic.

Is zero a number?