obiero wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:This law was to affect banks only or all lenders..... Whole of lending financial institutions including microfinance?
It is specifically banks.. Shylocks, loansharks, safcon etc are exempt for now.
How the media has decided on behalf of the president to state that he shall not sign is in bad taste You guys have a lot to learn. You think a reporter or an editor wakes up one morning and dreams this things up and writes them with such conviction (not as an opinion, but as a fact)?
In politics and big business, you sometimes leak information (on purpose!) either to test the waters or to reduce the impact of the actual announcement. For example, the impact of the announcement that the bill will not be signed will not be that major when people are already "aware" it will not be signed. From a different angle, you could also do it to test the reaction either to change or modify your decision or to be prepared for the reaction and plan for it.
You should be asking yourselves where these reporters/editors got all these specifications facts including figures and why they had the guts to publish them as facts!
You should try the same @Obiero. Even at home. Having information that you might be planning to marry a second wife leaked to your wife...
On a light note (about the second wife).
Never count on making a good sale. Have the purchase price be so attractive that even a mediocre sale gives good returns.