wazua Tue, Mar 24, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

1,583 Pages«<422423424425426>»
Kenya Airways...why ignore..
ArrestedDev
#4231 Posted : Monday, May 30, 2016 3:21:38 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 5/29/2016
Posts: 898
Location: Nairobi
Ebenyo wrote:
Nguze should not have been entrusted with the kq turnaround strategy in the first place.The implementation was vague.Heathrow slot was the heart of kq.You cant sale your own soul and convince me that you will still be alive.


On point. Disposing the slot sent out the wrong signals to customers and suppliers. Did the fuel supplier refused to extend credit to KQ and what is the impact on cash flows when an airline pays for fuel in cash? BA took the advantage to increase capacity? What about the cost implication of renting the afternoon slot on the overall LHR route performance? @obiero, do you see how flawed Ngunze's strategic decisions are?
OKEYO
#4232 Posted : Monday, May 30, 2016 4:03:44 PM
Rank: Hello

Joined: 5/18/2016
Posts: 5
Location: nairobi
this string of weird activities that are unfolding everyday at KQ. .will really put that firm Down.the funny part is that the government will not allow it to fail.so soon or later you will hear that they Hav been bailed out.its like a vicious cycle.
obiero
#4233 Posted : Monday, May 30, 2016 6:50:28 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 14,222
Location: nairobi
ArrestedDev wrote:
Ebenyo wrote:
Nguze should not have been entrusted with the kq turnaround strategy in the first place.The implementation was vague.Heathrow slot was the heart of kq.You cant sale your own soul and convince me that you will still be alive.


On point. Disposing the slot sent out the wrong signals to customers and suppliers. Did the fuel supplier refused to extend credit to KQ and what is the impact on cash flows when an airline pays for fuel in cash? BA took the advantage to increase capacity? What about the cost implication of renting the afternoon slot on the overall LHR route performance? @obiero, do you see how flawed Ngunze's strategic decisions are?

@arrested dev http://www.standardmedia...ith-new-flight-schedule

ngunze is backed by a full board. ogwapit et al. serious Kenyans with deep business insight. the best thing to do should be to give the young man a chance. he isn't intrinsically corrupt, that I am certain

KQ ABP 4.26
ArrestedDev
#4234 Posted : Monday, May 30, 2016 8:04:25 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 5/29/2016
Posts: 898
Location: Nairobi
obiero wrote:
ArrestedDev wrote:
Ebenyo wrote:
Nguze should not have been entrusted with the kq turnaround strategy in the first place.The implementation was vague.Heathrow slot was the heart of kq.You cant sale your own soul and convince me that you will still be alive.


On point. Disposing the slot sent out the wrong signals to customers and suppliers. Did the fuel supplier refused to extend credit to KQ and what is the impact on cash flows when an airline pays for fuel in cash? BA took the advantage to increase capacity? What about the cost implication of renting the afternoon slot on the overall LHR route performance? @obiero, do you see how flawed Ngunze's strategic decisions are?

@arrested dev http://www.standardmedia...ith-new-flight-schedule

ngunze is backed by a full board. ogwapit et al. serious Kenyans with deep business insight. the best thing to do should be to give the young man a chance. he isn't intrinsically corrupt, that I am certain


@obiero. When I look at your portfolio, I really feel for you. Ngunze is no longer defensible. He may have the backing of the board but the lack of aviation experience among the board members is also not helping at all. The boost to the flight schedule was just an exercise to hide the obvious reduction in capacity especially in the AMS route ( 400plus seats to just 234 seats). Lufthansa already took advantage of KQ's downgrade in the AMS route, when KQ announced that they will be using B787 then they resumed FRA-NBO. Just check the sequence of events leading to Lufthansa's resumption of NBO when KQ first announced the retirement of B777s. Ngunze and his board are indefensible. KQ requires fresh thinking ASAP. Nearly all the major decisions they have taken in a bid to turn around the airline is giving the competition an edge.
obiero
#4235 Posted : Monday, May 30, 2016 8:20:14 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 14,222
Location: nairobi
ArrestedDev wrote:
obiero wrote:
ArrestedDev wrote:
Ebenyo wrote:
Nguze should not have been entrusted with the kq turnaround strategy in the first place.The implementation was vague.Heathrow slot was the heart of kq.You cant sale your own soul and convince me that you will still be alive.


On point. Disposing the slot sent out the wrong signals to customers and suppliers. Did the fuel supplier refused to extend credit to KQ and what is the impact on cash flows when an airline pays for fuel in cash? BA took the advantage to increase capacity? What about the cost implication of renting the afternoon slot on the overall LHR route performance? @obiero, do you see how flawed Ngunze's strategic decisions are?

@arrested dev http://www.standardmedia...ith-new-flight-schedule

ngunze is backed by a full board. ogwapit et al. serious Kenyans with deep business insight. the best thing to do should be to give the young man a chance. he isn't intrinsically corrupt, that I am certain


@obiero. When I look at your portfolio, I really feel for you. Ngunze is no longer defensible. He may have the backing of the board but the lack of aviation experience among the board members is also not helping at all. The boost to the flight schedule was just an exercise to hide the obvious reduction in capacity especially in the AMS route ( 400plus seats to just 234 seats). Lufthansa already took advantage of KQ's downgrade in the AMS route, when KQ announced that they will be using B787 then they resumed FRA-NBO. Just check the sequence of events leading to Lufthansa's resumption of NBO when KQ first announced the retirement of B777s. Ngunze and his board are indefensible. KQ requires fresh thinking ASAP. Nearly all the major decisions they have taken in a bid to turn around the airline is giving the competition an edge.

@wazua this gent/lady knows the exact number of empty seats on a KQ flight na bado mnasema yeye si cabin crew. anyhow, I observe that Naikuni was even less equipped in intellect but he was at the helm for an extended span of time. Oigara also isn't a seasoned banker but has guided KCB well, and we know Dr Mwangi was captured on CCTV smashing the PCs at Trade Bank, but look at Equity now .. http://allafrica.com/stories/200707110921.html

KQ ABP 4.26
mkate_nusu
#4236 Posted : Monday, May 30, 2016 8:33:04 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 5/30/2016
Posts: 332
Location: Kayole
ArrestedDev wrote:
obiero wrote:
ArrestedDev wrote:
Ebenyo wrote:
Nguze should not have been entrusted with the kq turnaround strategy in the first place.The implementation was vague.Heathrow slot was the heart of kq.You cant sale your own soul and convince me that you will still be alive.


On point. Disposing the slot sent out the wrong signals to customers and suppliers. Did the fuel supplier refused to extend credit to KQ and what is the impact on cash flows when an airline pays for fuel in cash? BA took the advantage to increase capacity? What about the cost implication of renting the afternoon slot on the overall LHR route performance? @obiero, do you see how flawed Ngunze's strategic decisions are?

@arrested dev http://www.standardmedia...ith-new-flight-schedule

ngunze is backed by a full board. ogwapit et al. serious Kenyans with deep business insight. the best thing to do should be to give the young man a chance. he isn't intrinsically corrupt, that I am certain


@obiero. When I look at your portfolio, I really feel for you. Ngunze is no longer defensible. He may have the backing of the board but the lack of aviation experience among the board members is also not helping at all. The boost to the flight schedule was just an exercise to hide the obvious reduction in capacity especially in the AMS route ( 400plus seats to just 234 seats). Lufthansa already took advantage of KQ's downgrade in the AMS route, when KQ announced that they will be using B787 then they resumed FRA-NBO. Just check the sequence of events leading to Lufthansa's resumption of NBO when KQ first announced the retirement of B777s. Ngunze and his board are indefensible. KQ requires fresh thinking ASAP. Nearly all the major decisions they have taken in a bid to turn around the airline is giving the competition an edge.


When you have a board majority whose only experience in the aviation industry is flying first class, coupled with a lack of clear vision on the part of the CEO, no one in their right mind would touch KQ shares
KEGN, KPLC, KQ, SCOM
obiero
#4237 Posted : Monday, May 30, 2016 9:15:38 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 14,222
Location: nairobi
mkate_nusu wrote:
ArrestedDev wrote:
obiero wrote:
ArrestedDev wrote:
Ebenyo wrote:
Nguze should not have been entrusted with the kq turnaround strategy in the first place.The implementation was vague.Heathrow slot was the heart of kq.You cant sale your own soul and convince me that you will still be alive.


On point. Disposing the slot sent out the wrong signals to customers and suppliers. Did the fuel supplier refused to extend credit to KQ and what is the impact on cash flows when an airline pays for fuel in cash? BA took the advantage to increase capacity? What about the cost implication of renting the afternoon slot on the overall LHR route performance? @obiero, do you see how flawed Ngunze's strategic decisions are?

@arrested dev http://www.standardmedia...ith-new-flight-schedule

ngunze is backed by a full board. ogwapit et al. serious Kenyans with deep business insight. the best thing to do should be to give the young man a chance. he isn't intrinsically corrupt, that I am certain


@obiero. When I look at your portfolio, I really feel for you. Ngunze is no longer defensible. He may have the backing of the board but the lack of aviation experience among the board members is also not helping at all. The boost to the flight schedule was just an exercise to hide the obvious reduction in capacity especially in the AMS route ( 400plus seats to just 234 seats). Lufthansa already took advantage of KQ's downgrade in the AMS route, when KQ announced that they will be using B787 then they resumed FRA-NBO. Just check the sequence of events leading to Lufthansa's resumption of NBO when KQ first announced the retirement of B777s. Ngunze and his board are indefensible. KQ requires fresh thinking ASAP. Nearly all the major decisions they have taken in a bid to turn around the airline is giving the competition an edge.


When you have a board majority whose only experience in the aviation industry is flying first class, coupled with a lack of clear vision on the part of the CEO, no one in their right mind would touch KQ shares

himkatenusu karibu wazua mmfanye kazi ya kukashifu KQ. ile ya baggage imeshindikana,ground staff routinely open bags and pilfer, then ngunze is blamed

KQ ABP 4.26
mkate_nusu
#4238 Posted : Monday, May 30, 2016 10:48:47 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 5/30/2016
Posts: 332
Location: Kayole
obiero wrote:
mkate_nusu wrote:
ArrestedDev wrote:
obiero wrote:
ArrestedDev wrote:
Ebenyo wrote:
Nguze should not have been entrusted with the kq turnaround strategy in the first place.The implementation was vague.Heathrow slot was the heart of kq.You cant sale your own soul and convince me that you will still be alive.


On point. Disposing the slot sent out the wrong signals to customers and suppliers. Did the fuel supplier refused to extend credit to KQ and what is the impact on cash flows when an airline pays for fuel in cash? BA took the advantage to increase capacity? What about the cost implication of renting the afternoon slot on the overall LHR route performance? @obiero, do you see how flawed Ngunze's strategic decisions are?

@arrested dev http://www.standardmedia...ith-new-flight-schedule

ngunze is backed by a full board. ogwapit et al. serious Kenyans with deep business insight. the best thing to do should be to give the young man a chance. he isn't intrinsically corrupt, that I am certain


@obiero. When I look at your portfolio, I really feel for you. Ngunze is no longer defensible. He may have the backing of the board but the lack of aviation experience among the board members is also not helping at all. The boost to the flight schedule was just an exercise to hide the obvious reduction in capacity especially in the AMS route ( 400plus seats to just 234 seats). Lufthansa already took advantage of KQ's downgrade in the AMS route, when KQ announced that they will be using B787 then they resumed FRA-NBO. Just check the sequence of events leading to Lufthansa's resumption of NBO when KQ first announced the retirement of B777s. Ngunze and his board are indefensible. KQ requires fresh thinking ASAP. Nearly all the major decisions they have taken in a bid to turn around the airline is giving the competition an edge.


When you have a board majority whose only experience in the aviation industry is flying first class, coupled with a lack of clear vision on the part of the CEO, no one in their right mind would touch KQ shares

himkatenusu karibu wazua mmfanye kazi ya kukashifu KQ. ile ya baggage imeshindikana,ground staff routinely open bags and pilfer, then ngunze is blamed


the low level workers are just displaying a culture engrained in the whole company in general(theft). heri hao they are stealing a few items here and there from less than 1% of the daily volume of baggage transiting their hands. the top fish are minting millions some bold enough to do so even in the ongoing process of an audit.
'unatafuta dere atakupeleka kwa accident', ndio me(KQ)
KEGN, KPLC, KQ, SCOM
VituVingiSana
#4239 Posted : Tuesday, May 31, 2016 1:33:53 AM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,349
Location: Nairobi
obiero wrote:
ArrestedDev wrote:
Ebenyo wrote:
Nguze should not have been entrusted with the kq turnaround strategy in the first place.The implementation was vague.Heathrow slot was the heart of kq.You cant sale your own soul and convince me that you will still be alive.


On point. Disposing the slot sent out the wrong signals to customers and suppliers. Did the fuel supplier refused to extend credit to KQ and what is the impact on cash flows when an airline pays for fuel in cash? BA took the advantage to increase capacity? What about the cost implication of renting the afternoon slot on the overall LHR route performance? @obiero, do you see how flawed Ngunze's strategic decisions are?

@arrested dev http://www.standardmedia...ith-new-flight-schedule

ngunze is backed by a full board. ogwapit et al. serious Kenyans with deep business insight. the best thing to do should be to give the young man a chance. he isn't intrinsically corrupt, that I am certain


Titus Naikuni had the full backing of KQ's board. They even gave the bastard an extra year to finish f***ing the shareholders. Shall I even start with Alex Mbugua?

Ngunze may have been given a lemon as he moved from COO to CEO.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
VituVingiSana
#4240 Posted : Tuesday, May 31, 2016 1:36:45 AM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,349
Location: Nairobi
@Obiero - Please come clean. Roho safi.

1) Do/Did you get any free/discounted flights on KQ?
2) Do/Did you get any free/discounted upgrades on flights on KQ/Skyteam?
3) Do/Did you get any remuneration [cash/perks/freebies] on KQ?

Just asking.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
1,583 Pages«<422423424425426>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.