Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Culture
»
Contradiction Premises
Rank: New-farer Joined: 1/3/2015 Posts: 86 Location: Bomet
|
KIKItheKING wrote:God is not a contradictory God. HE is the Supreme being. Hence logic can never be applied to HIM. But if its the accient gods, then the question is contradictory. 
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
It's better to be sane than 'Godly'.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 7/3/2007 Posts: 1,635
|
KIKItheKING wrote:God is not a contradictory God. HE is the Supreme being. Hence logic can never be applied to HIM. But if its the accient gods, then the question is contradictory. So god is now a he? When did that happen? This just gets gets curiouser and curiouser. "The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 7/3/2007 Posts: 1,635
|
tycho wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:KIKItheKING wrote:God can do ANYTHING.. Can He make a stone too heavy for Him to lift?
[Max Shulman - The many loves of Dobie Gillis _ 1951] There is a fundamental flaw in this question. The implied idea that there is a god 'out there' separate from human beings, rocks, trucks, tychos and alphadotis. There isn't. There is no 'out there' either. Wakanyugi, how have you inferred this 'out there' implication? I said 'implied' - which is a fairly common error My point is: God, being the totality of all that is/was/will be....and therefore contains any contradictions or none. Such perceived quality - 'contradiction' - could not reduce or even define such a being, anymore than the color of your shirt defines Tycho. "The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 7/3/2007 Posts: 1,635
|
tycho wrote:It's better to be sane than 'Godly'. Another contradiction (I think we should just blame language and we can all go home). It is easier to say 'Tycholy' than 'Godly' if you mean to make a distinction. By the definition of God given above, all are Godly by the mere fact they are integral in "all that is/was/will be..." - God. "The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Wakanyugi wrote:tycho wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:KIKItheKING wrote:God can do ANYTHING.. Can He make a stone too heavy for Him to lift?
[Max Shulman - The many loves of Dobie Gillis _ 1951] There is a fundamental flaw in this question. The implied idea that there is a god 'out there' separate from human beings, rocks, trucks, tychos and alphadotis. There isn't. There is no 'out there' either. Wakanyugi, how have you inferred this 'out there' implication? I said 'implied' - which is a fairly common error My point is: God, being the totality of all that is/was/will be....and therefore contains any contradictions or none. Such perceived quality - 'contradiction' - could not reduce or even define such a being, anymore than the color of your shirt defines Tycho. Is 'God' the totality of all that is really? Anyway, implication is a logical construct, or a psychological projection.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Wakanyugi wrote:tycho wrote:It's better to be sane than 'Godly'. Another contradiction (I think we should just blame language and we can all go home). It is easier to say 'Tycholy' than 'Godly' if you mean to make a distinction. By the definition of God given above, all are Godly by the mere fact they are integral in "all that is/was/will be..." - God. Of course your answer is also a contradiction even in itself. What amazes me is the implied war on contradiction that I see here. The more I think about it the more I see madness.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 1/7/2015 Posts: 125
|
Wakanyugi wrote:KIKItheKING wrote:God is not a contradictory God. HE is the Supreme being. Hence logic can never be applied to HIM. But if its the accient gods, then the question is contradictory. So god is now a he? When did that happen? This just gets gets curiouser and curiouser. In the begining God said They creat a person in THEIR own image. They created a Man. So God is HE FEAR GOD
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 7/3/2007 Posts: 1,635
|
tycho wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:tycho wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:KIKItheKING wrote:God can do ANYTHING.. Can He make a stone too heavy for Him to lift?
[Max Shulman - The many loves of Dobie Gillis _ 1951] There is a fundamental flaw in this question. The implied idea that there is a god 'out there' separate from human beings, rocks, trucks, tychos and alphadotis. There isn't. There is no 'out there' either. Wakanyugi, how have you inferred this 'out there' implication? I said 'implied' - which is a fairly common error My point is: God, being the totality of all that is/was/will be....and therefore contains any contradictions or none. Such perceived quality - 'contradiction' - could not reduce or even define such a being, anymore than the color of your shirt defines Tycho. Is 'God' the totality of all that is really? Anyway, implication is a logical construct, or a psychological projection. The God I believe in can not be any less. But if you chose to reduce yours that is OK too. At least I can then boast that my God can kick your god's butt.  "The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 7/3/2007 Posts: 1,635
|
tycho wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:tycho wrote:It's better to be sane than 'Godly'. Another contradiction (I think we should just blame language and we can all go home). It is easier to say 'Tycholy' than 'Godly' if you mean to make a distinction. By the definition of God given above, all are Godly by the mere fact they are integral in "all that is/was/will be..." - God. Of course your answer is also a contradiction even in itself. Of course it is. Here is an attempt at none contradiction: 'within or without, the all that is, God is.' So, to answer the question that started this discussion: God can be a contradiction; just as God can be good, evil, beautiful, ugly, tall short...etc seeing as God is all of these and more, yet none of these terms define God, being as they are first and foremost, creations of only one aspect of an all inclusive God - in other words language expressions of human beings desire to define reality through contrast."The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Culture
»
Contradiction Premises
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|