@muchknow - That is my dilemma as we chat...
IMHO, the price should be at least NAV since the assets are decent income producing assets (not dead assets) so at 25, 30, 35... it was a bargain... coz NAV at 30 Sep 2009 was 42/-
Since I do not have more info on the hedges except as provided in the Annual Report, AGM & presentation for 1H 2009-10 it is tuff to figure out the 'new NAV'...
Oil is over $80 thus there is an additional benefit from the reduction in losses from the hedges as of 30 Sep 2009.
Flew on KQ recently & my route/segment/flight was almost full but this might not be indicative of the rest of the network...
So... I am going to wait for a little while... I can afford the risk coz I am above my initial target...
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett