Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Science of social networks
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:symbols wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:Muriel wrote:Social networks are a powerful tool. They are a resource. The new field for Revolution and counter-revolt. If they are a tool then I am glad I am not the raw material. I think we are all raw materials now. I had a scary experience of this the other day. I was searching for a running belt on Amazon. I didn't buy. But since then Facebook has been advertising running belts on my FB page. I have never, to my knowledge, linked the two pages. Privacy today is as dead as the dodo. To me, that it is you who did go looking for the running belt first proves to me that you were not the raw material there. You took the initiative. On the other hand, if first you saw the running belt on "facebook" (How I detest it!) then decided you want it and went to Amazon you would then be a raw material ready for "processing". I have not "linked" anything anywhere and I have a bunch of pro privacy addons hence my dodo is still alive today. Why is it not, that the running belt manufacturer prompted @Wakanyugi to check for it at amazon? The social network isn't linear, and ordered. The individual orders it for himself. An illustration is best seen in graph theory. You can analyze a path from any node(point) and go through all points and back to it. I suspect it is Google who sold me out. I got to Amazon through them. How they then found my face book page defeats me. As to whether this destruction of privacy is worth it, I will leave that to greater minds to unravel. But here is a theory: "In our super-reality (Unity) we are all one and privacy is in fact an illusion. We know everything about everything and everyone. Could it be that, through technology, social networks etc we are moving to a time when our sub realities will be Unity as well? Then this big brotherism might be worth it." /quote] Let me assume what you say is true,who will control big brother and who will decide what is right and wrong? Right now big brother is the corporate crowd as we have seen. They are spending good money on this technology because they can see the immediate benefit. The Unity I spoke of is more idealistic. One where the system works for the benefit of all. Where technology contributes to the realization of our true self. I believe that will happen...inevitably. Big brother is you. Big brother controls Big brother. If it is me then why don't I agree with that Big brother is doing? Because you don't understand him.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:I thought you were talking about the objectives of the program.
Why define it as a super mind or metapsychology?
I agree the reflective space has been expanded but that could also affect the attention span. Because all programmers are programed. It is programing itself, that's why these studies are recent. Any program is to optimize itself. That's what the super mind wants. It's always been there. What we see is a reflection. Of the super mind. Being programmed doesn't mean you have the same program or the same responses.But considering what you've said above,then that would mean it's all part of the super mind's plan to optimize itself.For what reason? To be and become. The purpose of life is life. The purpose of life is life.What does that mean?To be life and become life? Yes. To be. And being is organizing and disorganizing. Why disorganize to organize? Because the cost of not disorganizing is greater than the benefits. To enjoy more benefits, one embraces chaos. The direction is life in itself. Energy. Power. Intelligence. Language. Privacy, is about how we know, and understand what we don't know. Cover is for insufficiency before the it. A consolation of the mind. Music has sound, light, kinesthetic sense, and other 'characteristics' whose perception is of a different kind from normal human perception. I am yet to see any benefits out of this chaos or to understand why they choose the 'benefits' for others.Is this dialogue? The explanation for your situation is simple; your order system is changing from without. Or from other nodes. But isn't this normal and even necessary? Your responsibility then becomes one of optimizing to change and entropy. This is the essence of the study of social networks. What order system are you talking about? All I am seeing is a declaration of might makes right. "Insanity - a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world." Sometimes optimizing yourself to change is folly.What they are showing is not study of social networks but its manipulation to achieve their goals. 1. How aware are you of your social network? 2. What's your network doing? 3. What are you doing in, and to the networks? 4. How do you resolve emergent conflict? 5. How can you influence your network? The network is always there. How to use it is the question. We're talking about people.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:symbols wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:Muriel wrote:Social networks are a powerful tool. They are a resource. The new field for Revolution and counter-revolt. If they are a tool then I am glad I am not the raw material. I think we are all raw materials now. I had a scary experience of this the other day. I was searching for a running belt on Amazon. I didn't buy. But since then Facebook has been advertising running belts on my FB page. I have never, to my knowledge, linked the two pages. Privacy today is as dead as the dodo. To me, that it is you who did go looking for the running belt first proves to me that you were not the raw material there. You took the initiative. On the other hand, if first you saw the running belt on "facebook" (How I detest it!) then decided you want it and went to Amazon you would then be a raw material ready for "processing". I have not "linked" anything anywhere and I have a bunch of pro privacy addons hence my dodo is still alive today. Why is it not, that the running belt manufacturer prompted @Wakanyugi to check for it at amazon? The social network isn't linear, and ordered. The individual orders it for himself. An illustration is best seen in graph theory. You can analyze a path from any node(point) and go through all points and back to it. I suspect it is Google who sold me out. I got to Amazon through them. How they then found my face book page defeats me. As to whether this destruction of privacy is worth it, I will leave that to greater minds to unravel. But here is a theory: "In our super-reality (Unity) we are all one and privacy is in fact an illusion. We know everything about everything and everyone. Could it be that, through technology, social networks etc we are moving to a time when our sub realities will be Unity as well? Then this big brotherism might be worth it." /quote] Let me assume what you say is true,who will control big brother and who will decide what is right and wrong? Right now big brother is the corporate crowd as we have seen. They are spending good money on this technology because they can see the immediate benefit. The Unity I spoke of is more idealistic. One where the system works for the benefit of all. Where technology contributes to the realization of our true self. I believe that will happen...inevitably. Big brother is you. Big brother controls Big brother. If it is me then why don't I agree with that Big brother is doing? Because you don't understand him. Or he isn't me.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:symbols wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:Muriel wrote:Social networks are a powerful tool. They are a resource. The new field for Revolution and counter-revolt. If they are a tool then I am glad I am not the raw material. I think we are all raw materials now. I had a scary experience of this the other day. I was searching for a running belt on Amazon. I didn't buy. But since then Facebook has been advertising running belts on my FB page. I have never, to my knowledge, linked the two pages. Privacy today is as dead as the dodo. To me, that it is you who did go looking for the running belt first proves to me that you were not the raw material there. You took the initiative. On the other hand, if first you saw the running belt on "facebook" (How I detest it!) then decided you want it and went to Amazon you would then be a raw material ready for "processing". I have not "linked" anything anywhere and I have a bunch of pro privacy addons hence my dodo is still alive today. Why is it not, that the running belt manufacturer prompted @Wakanyugi to check for it at amazon? The social network isn't linear, and ordered. The individual orders it for himself. An illustration is best seen in graph theory. You can analyze a path from any node(point) and go through all points and back to it. I suspect it is Google who sold me out. I got to Amazon through them. How they then found my face book page defeats me. As to whether this destruction of privacy is worth it, I will leave that to greater minds to unravel. But here is a theory: "In our super-reality (Unity) we are all one and privacy is in fact an illusion. We know everything about everything and everyone. Could it be that, through technology, social networks etc we are moving to a time when our sub realities will be Unity as well? Then this big brotherism might be worth it." /quote] Let me assume what you say is true,who will control big brother and who will decide what is right and wrong? Right now big brother is the corporate crowd as we have seen. They are spending good money on this technology because they can see the immediate benefit. The Unity I spoke of is more idealistic. One where the system works for the benefit of all. Where technology contributes to the realization of our true self. I believe that will happen...inevitably. Big brother is you. Big brother controls Big brother. If it is me then why don't I agree with that Big brother is doing? Because you don't understand him. Or he isn't me. It can't be. Look at your graph.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:symbols wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:Muriel wrote:Social networks are a powerful tool. They are a resource. The new field for Revolution and counter-revolt. If they are a tool then I am glad I am not the raw material. I think we are all raw materials now. I had a scary experience of this the other day. I was searching for a running belt on Amazon. I didn't buy. But since then Facebook has been advertising running belts on my FB page. I have never, to my knowledge, linked the two pages. Privacy today is as dead as the dodo. To me, that it is you who did go looking for the running belt first proves to me that you were not the raw material there. You took the initiative. On the other hand, if first you saw the running belt on "facebook" (How I detest it!) then decided you want it and went to Amazon you would then be a raw material ready for "processing". I have not "linked" anything anywhere and I have a bunch of pro privacy addons hence my dodo is still alive today. Why is it not, that the running belt manufacturer prompted @Wakanyugi to check for it at amazon? The social network isn't linear, and ordered. The individual orders it for himself. An illustration is best seen in graph theory. You can analyze a path from any node(point) and go through all points and back to it. I suspect it is Google who sold me out. I got to Amazon through them. How they then found my face book page defeats me. As to whether this destruction of privacy is worth it, I will leave that to greater minds to unravel. But here is a theory: "In our super-reality (Unity) we are all one and privacy is in fact an illusion. We know everything about everything and everyone. Could it be that, through technology, social networks etc we are moving to a time when our sub realities will be Unity as well? Then this big brotherism might be worth it." /quote] Let me assume what you say is true,who will control big brother and who will decide what is right and wrong? Right now big brother is the corporate crowd as we have seen. They are spending good money on this technology because they can see the immediate benefit. The Unity I spoke of is more idealistic. One where the system works for the benefit of all. Where technology contributes to the realization of our true self. I believe that will happen...inevitably. Big brother is you. Big brother controls Big brother. If it is me then why don't I agree with that Big brother is doing? Because you don't understand him. Or he isn't me. It can't be. Look at your graph. What graph are you talking about? How does this fit in in the democracy is a fallacy thread?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
The graph is a connection of all points connected to you. Check on 'Euler paths'.
The relation to democracy is that democracy works for those who understand their networks and influence them. Voting without such consciousness makes democracy to appear as not valid.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me.
|
|
|
Rank: User Joined: 8/15/2013 Posts: 13,237 Location: Vacuum
|
@muriel and company, when are you people coming up with a thread about "The science of eating fish"? If Obiero did it, Who Am I?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
Swenani wrote:@muriel and company, when are you people coming up with a thread about "The science of eating fish"? It already exists and goes to the spiritual 
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual once. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and any two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual once. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and any two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How am i Big brother?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual once. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and any two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How is Big brother me? You're asking how the two points are equivalent and co-determinant. That I can only let you work out from yourself if you apply the above example to global affairs. For example, national independence was related calls by America and the creation of Bretton woods institutions.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual once. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and any two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How is Big brother me? You're asking how the two points are equivalent and co-determinant. That I can only let you work out from yourself if you apply the above example to global affairs. For example, national independence was related calls by America and the creation of Bretton woods institutions. Systems,paths and connections doesn't make me Big brother and it also doesn't explain how I don't understand Big brother.This 'science of social networks' has shown an individual or group can make a conscious decision to manipulate the systems,paths and connections to generate events and outcomes suited for their own objectives.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual once. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and any two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How is Big brother me? You're asking how the two points are equivalent and co-determinant. That I can only let you work out from yourself if you apply the above example to global affairs. For example, national independence was related calls by America and the creation of Bretton woods institutions. Systems,paths and connections doesn't make me Big brother and it also doesn't explain how I don't understand Big brother.This 'science of social networks' has shown an individual or group can make a conscious decision to manipulate the systems,paths and connections to generate events and outcomes suited for their own objectives. What makes a person?
|
|
|
Rank: User Joined: 8/15/2013 Posts: 13,237 Location: Vacuum
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual oncine. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and anyI'm two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How is Big brother me? You're asking how the two points are equivalent and co-determinant. That I can only let you work out from yourself if you apply the above example to global affairs. For example, national independence was related calls by America and the creation of Bretton woods institutions. Systems,paths and connections doesn't make me Big brother and it also doesn't explain how I don't understand Big brother.This 'science of social networks' has shown an individual or group can make a conscious decision to manipulate the systems,paths and connections to generate events and outcomes suited for their own objectives. What makes a person? skin, blood, water, body mass, dick/shimo, attitude, culture and friends If Obiero did it, Who Am I?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Swenani wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual oncine. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and anyI'm two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How is Big brother me? You're asking how the two points are equivalent and co-determinant. That I can only let you work out from yourself if you apply the above example to global affairs. For example, national independence was related calls by America and the creation of Bretton woods institutions. Systems,paths and connections doesn't make me Big brother and it also doesn't explain how I don't understand Big brother.This 'science of social networks' has shown an individual or group can make a conscious decision to manipulate the systems,paths and connections to generate events and outcomes suited for their own objectives. What makes a person? skin, blood, water, body mass, dick/shimo, attitude, culture and friends All these you've mentioned are systems, connections, paths on different dimensions connected.
|
|
|
Rank: User Joined: 8/15/2013 Posts: 13,237 Location: Vacuum
|
tycho wrote:Swenani wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual oncine. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and anyI'm two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How is Big brother me? You're asking how the two points are equivalent and co-determinant. That I can only let you work out from yourself if you apply the above example to global affairs. For example, national independence was related calls by America and the creation of Bretton woods institutions. Systems,paths and connections doesn't make me Big brother and it also doesn't explain how I don't understand Big brother.This 'science of social networks' has shown an individual or group can make a conscious decision to manipulate the systems,paths and connections to generate events and outcomes suited for their own objectives. What makes a person? skin, blood, water, body mass, dick/shimo, attitude, culture and friends All these you've mentioned are systems, connections, paths on different dimensions connected. once connected, they make a person If Obiero did it, Who Am I?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552
|
tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:tycho wrote:symbols wrote:Saying it can't be doesn't make it so and neither does the graph.I could also have easily have said Big brother doesn't understand me.
I can influence with knowledge and let the individual make their own decision.This is focused on manipulation of the subconscious to bypass the conscious.With @murchr's case he was open about his point of view and someone can choose the path and the consequences. Are you conversant with Euler paths? Assume I am not and explain how Big brother is me. Consider a social system. It is made up of interrelated individuals where some connections are apparent or derived. For example, between you and I, there might be unnamed individuals who are connected to the conversation we're having. Now, when you connect all individuals graphically to illustrate the network you realize that there are paths-connections which when followed, will pass through each individual once. Normally the system's order follows such a path. Now taking such a path, and any two distinct points, if the two points are on the same path then they are mutually dependent, and determine each other even in sequence. Such that 'responsibility' is evenly distributed and co-determined. This is an equivalence. How is Big brother me? You're asking how the two points are equivalent and co-determinant. That I can only let you work out from yourself if you apply the above example to global affairs. For example, national independence was related calls by America and the creation of Bretton woods institutions. Systems,paths and connections doesn't make me Big brother and it also doesn't explain how I don't understand Big brother.This 'science of social networks' has shown an individual or group can make a conscious decision to manipulate the systems,paths and connections to generate events and outcomes suited for their own objectives. What makes a person? another
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Life
»
Science of social networks
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|