@AlphaDoti had to find a way of fixing his Moha ("phub" whatever that means) in that organogram alongside Abraham and Jesus.....He even has the temerity to refer to John (the baptist) as Yahya ...what the....!!!

@guka I had already explained why we do this way. Unless you missed my explanation. This is a prayer addressed to God, for the prophets/meesengers have done so much favour to us and to all the mankind. It is favour we cannot repay. We cannot pay the prophets back in any way.
All we can do is the prayer.

We are asked in the Quran to say this. I know you're not asked to do this yourself. So ISORAIT.

It's curious how you use 'logic'. And much as I get the gist of your argument, I can't help but ask what kind of logic this is. One that's too presumptuous of it's premises perhaps?

For example, could you be presuming that the 'universe' isn't 'infinite'? What does an expanding universe mean? What about 'expanding consciousness? Perhaps you'll deny such 'things'?

What does 'infinity' mean? If it means always having something 'ahead' or 'beyond' then the question of infinite regression shouldn't arise. Or if it arises it has a 'formula' or 'pattern'. Otherwise we'd all have to heed Wittgenstein's warning about speaking when there's nothing to say. Since we are saying we must come with formulae and methods, that also incorporate infinity.

This is crucial when we consider the meaning of the word 'God'. By talking about 'God' humans offer formulae that conform to the finite, and also involve the infinite. Though in our case 'God' is so finite. And therefore 'not God'. That's why you so believe your argument is a proof. It's not.