@chaka that is public info available kwa website yao www.kaa.go.ke
You will find it complete with passport photos bios/profiles and CV tu ndio hakuna let your fingers do the walking

of more fundamental concern to me are the following questions:

1.Exactly how many operational staffers does KAA employ?
2.What qualifications and training including intelligence and paramilitary have they undergone? Are background checks done?
3.How is the shift system operate and handing over done?
4.Are there any cctv cameras at the airport and are they regularly manned and serviced?
5.After the power failure fiasco what alternative especially solar and generators are in place?
6. Is the new greenfield terminal having sufficient provisions for solar power and rainwater harvesting?
7. Does the airport have an integrated security and access control system whereby you can link logs to files and photos of who accessed where when?

I said elsewhere our airport is a joke security control-wise
As to whether our alternatives Eldoret, Kisumu, Mombasa . .. .Nyeri(washa kucheka hii ni brand new ) are up to scratch. . . Is the subject of a thread am starting shortly

How we handle and deal with issues is what contributes to "world inequalities " as a soul in Wazua had started a post blaming White men for our misfortune and poverty.
If that fire was in Japan; transport minister could have committed suicide. Prime minister resigned and entire airport team sacked without pay regardless of who to blame or not.
If in china execution of several top guys.
But in our case speculating while enjoying merry go round of artificial disasters

But I think that for KQ to claim, they must have encountered losses arising from failure to provide a service as per the agreed contract with pax whose proof is a booking/ticket?
I doubt if previous travel statistics is valid to give weight to such a case-can you imagine how many airlines would randomly sue based on statistics?

If there is no evidence apart from bookings made by KQ to prove that they had prior travel arrangements on the day fire broke out then I see them hitting a wall.
Give allowance to the no-show pax who supposedly decide (all of them) not to travel on the day of fire, resulting in plane not taking off.
KQ must in this case prove that failure to take off was as a result of the fire and not pax who just had other biz to attend to.
This will be between pax and kq not KAA.

Unless there is a form of written contract btwn KAA and Airlines which stipulates that compensation as a result of negligence by KAA must be made to Airlines regardless of whether bookings were made or not on the day disaster broke out and that failure to fly was not as a result of no-shows or other technical faults on their side, I am not so sure abt the case.

..just thinking-say my engine fails,I let down pax by failing to fly,fire breaks out, but because there's room for compensation ,I claim from KAA because I operate 3 flights daily out of jkia..?

Could be wrong.

I know that those who lost baggage will be compensated by airlines and the airlines will sue the 3rd party? -KAA?? My guess because a ticket is proof enough.

SHAME ON KAA STAFF.Is there no thermostart to detect heat in an International Apt?

Where are we ranked now by IATA? .

kysse no plane can land on JKIA or any other gov controlled airport without authorization so there's a contractual agreement that they sign for use of facility. For a plane to take off or land, it pays KAA an amount which i believe is upfront, KAA is incharge of who lands at what time etc...if for whatever reason KAA doesnt facilitate their part of the bargain then they should pay the other party for loss of business due to the inconvinience. It doesnt matter if that plane was fully booked or half, loss of business is loss of business...

Now, those who landed at 4:00 could smell smoke and some saw a fire but there was no panic or action, what is really wrong with our institutions?

Dont be surprised, security footage ilichomeka, me thinks kuna kitu imekuwa smuggled in the process..