Wazua
»
Investor
»
Economy
»
Law Capping interest rates
Rank: Veteran Joined: 7/5/2010 Posts: 2,061 Location: Nairobi
|
winston wrote:So much bile against the banks...wah!
But they are in the business of making money...in a willing seller willing buyer market.
Interest rate caps are forcing the seller to sell at a price the seller is not willing to sell...unlike perishable goods...the banks goods do not go stale...but get 'sold' or invested in other instruments (T/bonds). If the gova wanted to force the seller to sell...they should lower the rates available on government securities...as long as these remain attractive...only the creme de la creme buyers will get to access credit from the banks.
The game being played currently is a stalemate...the banks VS gova...both are watching who will blink first...
Richly deserved bile if I may say so. See, while no one forces you at gunpoint, it is not willing-seller-willing-buyer, not 100%. Every productive Kenyan participates in the economic/financial system in some way, big or small. That is one of the reasons why on my employment forms for instance, there were places to fill bank name and account. I could have preferred to be paid in goats, cows and vats of milk. A man may want to get high from a hit of cocaine and another man is more than ready to sell it to him. Willing buyer willing seller. It is the first man's body, logically he should be free to do with it what he wants and yet the transaction is not regulated, it is straight out ILLEGAL. But sale of alcohol which is harmful is legal (but regulated).Who knows with governments huh? They are all over the place. Indeed we should blame the government some more for selling us down the river for so long on this interest rate thing. This should have kicked in the first time it was proposed by Joe Donde. Here is a scenario. What do you imagine would happen if KQ went tits-up? I have a theory. The govt would show-up with a taxpayer funded bail-out,...with platitudes about KQ being an asset of national pride, recognition and PR, which is all true,...but remember KQ got where it is as a result of relentless looting,...and then some banksters swoop in, ignore glaring risks and offer low interest credit to the tune of billions. What is there to worry about huh? The taxpayer will underwrite it. They all come out of it unscathed. Risk is a concept that banks apply only to the regular small borrower but meanwhile they are happy that the tax he/she pays insures their big bets on corporates rife with malfeasance. But when a small borrower wants a loan? Ohhh no ....you are financial sh** Mr SoAndSo. You can have your 5 bob loan but its 25% p.a or you can f*** off. And you wonder why we are angry with banks? ....Perhaps we should enact our own version of Glass-Steagall and I might be convinced not to be apopletic, just merely angry. It is a system rigged by the greed and low cunning of banksters with the help or inaction by an inept and retarded government. They are happy to take your money, the governments money (which is our money), play high stakes games among themselves with it and when one corner says no, this is not conscionable, its dresses up, high drama, wailing and gnashing of teeth... "oh, we are being vilified! ohh the humanity! it is not sound ECONOMICS! KENYA WILL CRASH INTO ECONOMIC HELL! WATCH!!!!!!!" The sheer arrogance of presuming that an interest rate regime should not apply to them. Out of 196 countries on earth, 76 of them (including the US, Germany, Switzerland, Canada France, Belgium, Italy, Australia, United Kingdom .....) have some form of Interest rate control. I will quote here a paper authored by the World Bank itself. Quote:
Several political and economic reasons motivate the use of interest rate caps, for example, to
support a specific industry or sector of the economy where a market failure exists or where a greater
concentration of financial resources is needed. Those market failures result from information asymmetries
and the inability of financial institutions to differentiate between risky and safe clients, from adverse
selection, and from moral hazard
Sound familiar? Here is another gem ... Quote:
Interest rate caps can also be justified to protect consumers from usury and exploitation by
guaranteeing access to credit at reasonable interest rates and to facilitate prosecution of exploitative and
deceptive lenders. They can also help protect the public interest by ensuring a fair and reasonable interest
rate on loans. On this premise, interest rate caps may also be a good way to limit access to credit to some
impaired and low-income consumers, because they help avoid social harm (OFT 2010). And, finally,
according to another rationale, because prices charged for credit can be arbitrary and anticompetitive and
thus be higher than the true cost of lending, setting a lower cap on interest would still allow lenders to
operate.
In the interest of fairness, the paper also mentions some disadvantages of the use of rate caps. But for our case here in Kenya, the very title captures it aptly. "Still Popular, but a Blunt Instrument". Kenya Banks only motivation is greed. The blunt instrument is the only thing they will understand. You can find the full paper here: http://documents.worldba...9083943/pdf/WPS7070.pdf
Vote wisely, keep the peace and be safe.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 11/13/2015 Posts: 1,654
|
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:If Uhuru signs this bill, I just may vote him for a second term.
Treasury and CBK are all for reduced interest rates, so why not support the process.
Market forces are not working as fast as we need them to work to manage the high interest rates regime. Will you honour your promise?
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 8/28/2015 Posts: 1,247
|
wukan wrote:Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:If Uhuru signs this bill, I just may vote him for a second term.
Treasury and CBK are all for reduced interest rates, so why not support the process.
Market forces are not working as fast as we need them to work to manage the high interest rates regime. Will you honour your promise? Am practising all ready. Personally this has saved me clean bucks. ,Behold, a sower went forth to sow;....
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/23/2008 Posts: 3,017
|
wukan wrote:Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:If Uhuru signs this bill, I just may vote him for a second term.
Treasury and CBK are all for reduced interest rates, so why not support the process.
Market forces are not working as fast as we need them to work to manage the high interest rates regime. Will you honour your promise? Key word was may  seriously, if there is one thing he has done well on was to sign this bill, he has saved businesses and individuals billions in usurius interest rates. "The purpose of bureaucracy is to compensate for incompetence and lack of discipline." James Collins
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 4/14/2010 Posts: 806 Location: Nairobi
|
quicksand wrote:winston wrote:So much bile against the banks...wah!
But they are in the business of making money...in a willing seller willing buyer market.
Interest rate caps are forcing the seller to sell at a price the seller is not willing to sell...unlike perishable goods...the banks goods do not go stale...but get 'sold' or invested in other instruments (T/bonds). If the gova wanted to force the seller to sell...they should lower the rates available on government securities...as long as these remain attractive...only the creme de la creme buyers will get to access credit from the banks.
The game being played currently is a stalemate...the banks VS gova...both are watching who will blink first...
Richly deserved bile if I may say so. See, while no one forces you at gunpoint, it is not willing-seller-willing-buyer, not 100%. Every productive Kenyan participates in the economic/financial system in some way, big or small. That is one of the reasons why on my employment forms for instance, there were places to fill bank name and account. I could have preferred to be paid in goats, cows and vats of milk. A man may want to get high from a hit of cocaine and another man is more than ready to sell it to him. Willing buyer willing seller. It is the first man's body, logically he should be free to do with it what he wants and yet the transaction is not regulated, it is straight out ILLEGAL. But sale of alcohol which is harmful is legal (but regulated).Who knows with governments huh? They are all over the place. Indeed we should blame the government some more for selling us down the river for so long on this interest rate thing. This should have kicked in the first time it was proposed by Joe Donde. Here is a scenario. What do you imagine would happen if KQ went tits-up? I have a theory. The govt would show-up with a taxpayer funded bail-out,...with platitudes about KQ being an asset of national pride, recognition and PR, which is all true,...but remember KQ got where it is as a result of relentless looting,...and then some banksters swoop in, ignore glaring risks and offer low interest credit to the tune of billions. What is there to worry about huh? The taxpayer will underwrite it. They all come out of it unscathed. Risk is a concept that banks apply only to the regular small borrower but meanwhile they are happy that the tax he/she pays insures their big bets on corporates rife with malfeasance. But when a small borrower wants a loan? Ohhh no ....you are financial sh** Mr SoAndSo. You can have your 5 bob loan but its 25% p.a or you can f*** off. And you wonder why we are angry with banks? ....Perhaps we should enact our own version of Glass-Steagall and I might be convinced not to be apopletic, just merely angry. It is a system rigged by the greed and low cunning of banksters with the help or inaction by an inept and retarded government. They are happy to take your money, the governments money (which is our money), play high stakes games among themselves with it and when one corner says no, this is not conscionable, its dresses up, high drama, wailing and gnashing of teeth... "oh, we are being vilified! ohh the humanity! it is not sound ECONOMICS! KENYA WILL CRASH INTO ECONOMIC HELL! WATCH!!!!!!!" The sheer arrogance of presuming that an interest rate regime should not apply to them. Out of 196 countries on earth, 76 of them (including the US, Germany, Switzerland, Canada France, Belgium, Italy, Australia, United Kingdom .....) have some form of Interest rate control. I will quote here a paper authored by the World Bank itself. Quote:
Several political and economic reasons motivate the use of interest rate caps, for example, to
support a specific industry or sector of the economy where a market failure exists or where a greater
concentration of financial resources is needed. Those market failures result from information asymmetries
and the inability of financial institutions to differentiate between risky and safe clients, from adverse
selection, and from moral hazard
Sound familiar? Here is another gem ... Quote:
Interest rate caps can also be justified to protect consumers from usury and exploitation by
guaranteeing access to credit at reasonable interest rates and to facilitate prosecution of exploitative and
deceptive lenders. They can also help protect the public interest by ensuring a fair and reasonable interest
rate on loans. On this premise, interest rate caps may also be a good way to limit access to credit to some
impaired and low-income consumers, because they help avoid social harm (OFT 2010). And, finally,
according to another rationale, because prices charged for credit can be arbitrary and anticompetitive and
thus be higher than the true cost of lending, setting a lower cap on interest would still allow lenders to
operate.
In the interest of fairness, the paper also mentions some disadvantages of the use of rate caps. But for our case here in Kenya, the very title captures it aptly. "Still Popular, but a Blunt Instrument". Kenya Banks only motivation is greed. The blunt instrument is the only thing they will understand. You can find the full paper here: http://documents.worldba...9083943/pdf/WPS7070.pdf
Vote wisely, keep the peace and be safe. @Quicksand...losts of points therein...but to pick on one of them...moral hazard (inability of banks to differentiate between a good (safe) customer and a bad (risky) customer)...wouldnt the solution to this informational asymmtry problem lie with government providing a framework that will provide the information (that is currently skewed)...and further I thought that the credit reference bureaus are serving that very purpose.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 11/13/2015 Posts: 1,654
|
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:wukan wrote:Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:If Uhuru signs this bill, I just may vote him for a second term.
Treasury and CBK are all for reduced interest rates, so why not support the process.
Market forces are not working as fast as we need them to work to manage the high interest rates regime. Will you honour your promise? Key word was may seriously, if there is one thing he has done well on was to sign this bill, he has saved businesses and individuals billions in usurius interest rates. Seriously  This is the one policy blunder that's keeping my vote at home in protest.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/18/2011 Posts: 12,069 Location: Kianjokoma
|
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:wukan wrote:Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:If Uhuru signs this bill, I just may vote him for a second term.
Treasury and CBK are all for reduced interest rates, so why not support the process.
Market forces are not working as fast as we need them to work to manage the high interest rates regime. Will you honour your promise? Key word was may seriously, if there is one thing he has done well on was to sign this bill, he has saved businesses and individuals billions in usurius interest rates.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 7/5/2010 Posts: 2,061 Location: Nairobi
|
winston wrote:quicksand wrote:winston wrote:So much bile against the banks...wah!
But they are in the business of making money...in a willing seller willing buyer market.
Interest rate caps are forcing the seller to sell at a price the seller is not willing to sell...unlike perishable goods...the banks goods do not go stale...but get 'sold' or invested in other instruments (T/bonds). If the gova wanted to force the seller to sell...they should lower the rates available on government securities...as long as these remain attractive...only the creme de la creme buyers will get to access credit from the banks.
The game being played currently is a stalemate...the banks VS gova...both are watching who will blink first...
Richly deserved bile if I may say so. See, while no one forces you at gunpoint, it is not willing-seller-willing-buyer, not 100%. Every productive Kenyan participates in the economic/financial system in some way, big or small. That is one of the reasons why on my employment forms for instance, there were places to fill bank name and account. I could have preferred to be paid in goats, cows and vats of milk. A man may want to get high from a hit of cocaine and another man is more than ready to sell it to him. Willing buyer willing seller. It is the first man's body, logically he should be free to do with it what he wants and yet the transaction is not regulated, it is straight out ILLEGAL. But sale of alcohol which is harmful is legal (but regulated).Who knows with governments huh? They are all over the place. Indeed we should blame the government some more for selling us down the river for so long on this interest rate thing. This should have kicked in the first time it was proposed by Joe Donde. Here is a scenario. What do you imagine would happen if KQ went tits-up? I have a theory. The govt would show-up with a taxpayer funded bail-out,...with platitudes about KQ being an asset of national pride, recognition and PR, which is all true,...but remember KQ got where it is as a result of relentless looting,...and then some banksters swoop in, ignore glaring risks and offer low interest credit to the tune of billions. What is there to worry about huh? The taxpayer will underwrite it. They all come out of it unscathed. Risk is a concept that banks apply only to the regular small borrower but meanwhile they are happy that the tax he/she pays insures their big bets on corporates rife with malfeasance. But when a small borrower wants a loan? Ohhh no ....you are financial sh** Mr SoAndSo. You can have your 5 bob loan but its 25% p.a or you can f*** off. And you wonder why we are angry with banks? ....Perhaps we should enact our own version of Glass-Steagall and I might be convinced not to be apopletic, just merely angry. It is a system rigged by the greed and low cunning of banksters with the help or inaction by an inept and retarded government. They are happy to take your money, the governments money (which is our money), play high stakes games among themselves with it and when one corner says no, this is not conscionable, its dresses up, high drama, wailing and gnashing of teeth... "oh, we are being vilified! ohh the humanity! it is not sound ECONOMICS! KENYA WILL CRASH INTO ECONOMIC HELL! WATCH!!!!!!!" The sheer arrogance of presuming that an interest rate regime should not apply to them. Out of 196 countries on earth, 76 of them (including the US, Germany, Switzerland, Canada France, Belgium, Italy, Australia, United Kingdom .....) have some form of Interest rate control. I will quote here a paper authored by the World Bank itself. Quote:
Several political and economic reasons motivate the use of interest rate caps, for example, to
support a specific industry or sector of the economy where a market failure exists or where a greater
concentration of financial resources is needed. Those market failures result from information asymmetries
and the inability of financial institutions to differentiate between risky and safe clients, from adverse
selection, and from moral hazard
Sound familiar? Here is another gem ... Quote:
Interest rate caps can also be justified to protect consumers from usury and exploitation by
guaranteeing access to credit at reasonable interest rates and to facilitate prosecution of exploitative and
deceptive lenders. They can also help protect the public interest by ensuring a fair and reasonable interest
rate on loans. On this premise, interest rate caps may also be a good way to limit access to credit to some
impaired and low-income consumers, because they help avoid social harm (OFT 2010). And, finally,
according to another rationale, because prices charged for credit can be arbitrary and anticompetitive and
thus be higher than the true cost of lending, setting a lower cap on interest would still allow lenders to
operate.
In the interest of fairness, the paper also mentions some disadvantages of the use of rate caps. But for our case here in Kenya, the very title captures it aptly. "Still Popular, but a Blunt Instrument". Kenya Banks only motivation is greed. The blunt instrument is the only thing they will understand. You can find the full paper here: http://documents.worldba...9083943/pdf/WPS7070.pdf
Vote wisely, keep the peace and be safe. @Quicksand...losts of points therein...but to pick on one of them...moral hazard (inability of banks to differentiate between a good (safe) customer and a bad (risky) customer)...wouldnt the solution to this informational asymmtry problem lie with government providing a framework that will provide the information (that is currently skewed)...and further I thought that the credit reference bureaus are serving that very purpose. A framework is good, but many times it is not sufficient. A painful deterrent is still needed. If CA hadn't slapped those interconnect caps we would still be calling at 28/- per minute...paying 150/- for a liter of Petrol. In addition, it is not that banks have no means of assessing risk (or commensurate risk, or some risk), they do, but a realistic rate that allows both the borrower and the bank mutual benefit offends our banks predilection for maximum possible profits and unabashed greed. Better to gut borrowers and leave tomorrow to sort itself out. Its not just Kenyan banks. Take the case of the American banks (in a scenario opposite to ours but the point here is the degree of autonomy), they had tools and the info to make informed decisions on which borrowers were risky to sell mortgages (sub-prime); They chose to ignore that good system and ignored persistent warnings, doubled down giving out huge loans to people who couldn't pay cause there was lots of money to be had. In the end, that greed led to a financial meltdown. The taxpayer had to bail out big banks The parallels of our banks with credit and peddlers of crack to addicts are many. Banks and bankers, simply cannot be trusted. This is true even in advanced economies (and financial systems). Every other week banks are fined billions or hundreds of millions by the US government over some misdeeds. They are constantly testing laws and regulations, looking for loopholes and weaknesses, deploying lobbyists and pseudo-economic theory to devastating effect - all in a bid to wring every last possible cent from customers, investors ..banks whine about something cause they want leeway to screw you some more. You need them on a very tight leash, wield a big stick which must be unerringly used to bash their heads in anytime they go a millimeter over the bounds. The society is a fabric and the economy is the threads in it, one sector cannot be allowed to liberally take dumps on it.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/7/2012 Posts: 11,935
|
Just may / May just ..... one sounds negative  In the business world, everyone is paid in two coins - cash and experience. Take the experience first; the cash will come later - H Geneen
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 1/27/2012 Posts: 851 Location: Nairobi
|
quicksand wrote:mkeiy wrote:quicksand wrote:Ngalaka wrote:Kusadikika wrote:Setting interest rates and assessing risk is very hard without data. In the a place like the US there is plenty of data to work with because of the reporting system using the social Security number that tracks everything.
You provide the number every time you rent a house, get utility connection like power and water, buy insurance, buy a car, get a credit card, borrow a loan etc.
There is therefore plenty of information to work with even before you have borrowed any money because if you have failed to pay your electricity or water bill or even rent it shows up.
This system works to provide a lot of information for businesses etc but on the flip side you feel like you are constantly being monitored. Even information like how frequently you use the ATM and what amounts you withdraw is known and probably being used to give a profile of who you are. Of course we are dealing with a bunch of theorists. This is Kenya - for crying out loud. Got to appreciate where we are at present - realism. Once upon a time,..the likes of Barclays and Stanchart required a minimum of 20,000 shillings to keep an account open. This was the late 90's, early 2000s. If you couldn't afford to park an expensive 20k you were not worth their time. Large swathes of Kenya were not worth their time as they started closing branches,..even in big towns like Nyahururu. The bitch slap that came still stings even today... There is an eerily similar parallel here. There is information to work with to assess risk even at present, starting by a bank's own books, its own lending history, its customers' borrowing history. We have a credit reference bureau, don't we? Who is going to be the first bank executive to stop moaning, get off his fat ass and exploit the new opportunities that this rate regime has brought? Who will deliver the bitch slap v2.0? Lets wait and see. @quicksand. Using few words,if you may, highlight these NEW opportunities that rate cap has brought, which NEVER existed before? I already have, in the text I posted, but happy to repeat it. The premise is that there is no credit history information. That is not true. A bank surely has credit information of its past borrowers? Start with those. Introduce new procedures, like for instance quick audits of business operations to ascertain the health of the borrowers. Have salaries employees process pay through your accounts..etc etc Yes, it will introduce overheads BUT it is doing something. Banks could share info. Other companies do, for instance telcos have cross billing agreements, network resource sharing agreements, newspapers have printing agreements....it reduces risk for everyone....the rate regime is supposed to spur innovation and cooperation of this nature, if only banks weren't such prima donnas. Govt borrowing is perhaps to blame. What is the opportunity? Capitalizing on the fear of other banks. A sacco I know is buying and consolidating banks loans for it members. That is a positive sign. That is confidence in its members ability to pay. Saccos even loan out money merely on a written guarantee from other members and members issue guarantees many times over their holdings - no security/asset holds - and yet you don't get hissy fits from Saccos. There are no meltdowns in Saccos as a sector. I hope it sticks, I really do. @quicksand. I said few words. Didn't bother reading your long post.
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Investor
»
Economy
»
Law Capping interest rates
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|