mwenza wrote:
@TAZ.........You are very wrong.
Suppose, say nasri won the award only for the month of August last year(the award was actually won by scholes). On the other hand suppose Vidic has been runners-up for all the months(of coz they dont mention who the runners-up was).........When it comes to the final vote, between nasri and vidic, whom do you think stands a better chance of winning it?
@Mwenza and Jus Blazin...this doesn't make sense at all. The PFA players vote EVERY MONTH for the "PFA player of the month". Whether Vidic was "runners-up" or not that's irrelevant because another vote has to be done for "Player of the Year"....by the same people who didn't think his performance was good enough to win any monthly award. Now whats so difficult to understand there.
@ Marty...I think the Arsenal board would be more comfortable working with Stan Kroenke than Usmanov who would most likely pull an Abramovich on them.
http://www.guardian.co.u...al-takeover-live-updates