@kizee - S&L was never as active at soliciting for deposits... The idea of it being merged into KCB has been around for at least 2 years.
So the question of S&L being in 'trouble' are not valid... It was cheaper for the parent (KCB) to solicit for deposits which were on-lent to S&L.
HFCK is a different case since Equity owns 20%... it needs to find its own deposits... and if Equity were to buy 100% of HFCK (a distinct possibility in 2-3 years)... you will see it merged into Equity as well as a 'division'.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett