Fortunately for us, we don’t believe in that imaginary god and devil nonsense.

We eat animals to survive, we don’t need to have sex with animals to survive. Big difference. Even in the primitive jungles, lions eat buffaloes without their consent to perpetrate their survival......but you’ll never see them trying to have sex with an antelope because their is no dire need for that. It’s called survival, the most basic of instincts. Sexual gratification in the absence of consent is a crime. It has a fancy name nowadays, it’s called RAPE.

But anyway, to each their own, it’s already enough of an insult to compare atheism to pedophilia and beastiality. Like really???

So lGBTQ+ and these thieves plundering resources all over the place, which is worse. Thou shall not steal.

Is plunder legal?

It is not worrying. It is about the nature of human beings to have moral feelings about anything. You might not have them against homosexuals but many people do and society has to contend with the moral repugnance not of the act itself but of the fact that a majority of the population feel it. The fabric of society is woven with thousands of these repugnancies that people accept as just the way things are and they make every society what it is.

Even the most liberal and irreligious people have some moral boundaries that they would not cross. Here is an example: Man is married to a woman when they are both 19. They have a son. They are a loving family. When they reach 40 the son is 21. Son is single. Man dies. Woman is sad and devastated. Son does not like to see his mother sad so he is always there to console her. Soon they start having sex but they are careful to use a condom to avoid any kind of inbreeding. What is wrong with this scenario? They are both adults. No one is cheating on the other. They are providing support to each other. No one is taking advantage of the other. They are taking precautions so that they don't have any kind of inbreeding. What rational argument is there that tells you that this is not right? Yet everybody reading this will know down in their bones that this is wrong. It is a moral feeling that most people have.

Now, it is possible that this moral feelings about anything, including the one in the above example can be diminished in time by having more and more people committing the act and over a period of time it becomes common place. There are thousands of these things in any one society and that is what makes them different. People are not being unreasonable when they find certain behaviors objectionable. People should understand themselves and the societies in which they live and find harmony in their coexistence.

and if l may ask,what is the relationship between loving and sex? must one sex everything that one has a feeling for?

Mutua.

I know. Atheism is in the Bible too. It's the devil's weapon. First he creates doubt, assures you of increased wisdom the you bite the fruit.

The fabric of human society is woven more around tolerance and eliminating the more aggressive members of society than morals. The story of sodom was more about the rape of visitors(aggression)than gay acts.

If you were in Sodom and Gomorrah you would want the constitution of Sodom to also protect you if you wanted to engage in straight sex. Just imagine if Mungiki or al-shabaab enacted their own moral code and forced you to live under it. Would you agree to have your daughter circumcised just because the majority felt repugnant towards uncircumcised girls?

Human beings and morals. See the story of Lot daughters who had witnessed the destruction of Sodom

I'm glad Kenya, at least the judiciary is moving in the right direction and protecting LGBT minority. The Atheists should also get the same protection as someone has said - it is your decision whether to believe and worship a sky god, a white god, a desert god, a cow, elephant, a mountain god or no god.
As for the Bible thumbers chagrined by the decision, I'm sorry.