This image has given me more hard ons than any other I can think of. It is usually on a Friday after lunch and I send a text to Ciru Diabs (I do not know her real name but this is the name saved on the phone) saying "Niaje kasupuu." Sometimes she answers immediately sometimes she takes a few minutes sometimes hours and sometimes she just does not answer.

What is funny is that any text message I receive after sending this one will give me an instant hard on. Many times I have excitedly opened the message only to find it is from someone else like the guy I buy shoes from telling me he has new stock Hardships indeed!!

In discussing Kant’s ideas about sexual objectification, Nussbaum
writes:
Central to Kant’s analysis of sexuality and marriage is the idea that sexual desire
is a very powerful force that conduces to the thing-like treatment of persons . . .
Why does Kant think that sex does this? . . . The idea seems to be that sexual
desire and pleasure cause very acute forms of sensation in a person’s own body;
that these sensations drive out, for a time, all other thoughts, including the
thoughts of respect for humanity that are characteristic of the moral attitude to
persons. Apparently he also thinks that they drive out every end-like consideration
of the pleasure or experience of the sex partner and cause attention to be
riveted on one’s own bodily states. In that condition of mind, one cannot manage
to see the other person as anything but a tool of one’s own interests, a set of
bodily parts that are useful tools for one’s pleasure, and the powerful urge to
secure one’s own sexual satisfaction will ensure that instrumentalization . . . the
keen interest both parties have in sexual satisfaction will lead them to permit
themselves to be treated in this thing-like way by one another, indeed to volunteer
eagerly to be dehumanized in order that they can dehumanize the other in
turn. (Nussbaum, 1999: 224)

We are now in a position to notice something quite interesting about Kant. He
thinks that focusing on the genital organs entails the disregard of personhood –
because he apparently believes that personhood and humanity, and along with
them, individuality, do not reside in the genital organs; the genital organs are
just fungible nonhuman things, like so many tools. Lawrence says, that is a
response that itself dehumanizes us, by reducing to something subhuman what
properly is a major part of the humanity in us, and the individuality as well. We
are a certain type of animal, and animality is part of our personhood, completely
interwoven with individuality and personality. (Nussbaum, 1999: 231)
Lawrence contends, contrary to Kant, that our bodies and their appetites
can be treated as integral aspects of our humanity, even if they are not what
may be most distinctive about us. Lawrence further contends, according to
Nussbaum, that women, in particular, need not be desexualized in order
to be human and respected as persons.

What role does sex play in human life? How does it differ from sex in other organisms?

Bigshick,please come rescue Tycho from himself.Thanks.

You have now introduced a moral dimension which I had not considered. I had taken you questions as referring to the consensual act. In my book rape and other forms of coercion are not sex but assault.

But my thinking is, whether you experience orgasm or not, the bridge is always there. Similarly the process of conception to birth is a similar bridge experience, only stretched out over time. The very meaning of our existence requires BEING in multiple dimensions (realities if you like) simultaneously, some of which it seems can only be bridged through such instruments as sex, drugs, some religious states etc.

Kumbe you too can fall the woman trap?
Kumbe you have normal human feelings?

What about this feeling a man experiences when he peeps/sees through the thayos of a lady seated with bums slightly a part?
You feel your body warming up, heart upping the beats a little, fear, anxiety...all bundle up together.

And the more you steal the look the more you feel good and healthier...when she widen a little bit and you manage to see the panty (especially if its white), you feel heavenly and born-again.

Why and what is is this feeling?

The same feeling is much much less with a totally nude airport.

#these post belong to @tycho and like minded, so if you are a Mr. /or Ms. Holy, please spare us your holy shi*t!

Not 'today' but almost always... I have to get to the bottom of this 'hardship'.

Would the panty color matter? Whether purple, blue black or white? @Impunity una maneno