Interesting! I thought all conversation is 'symbolic interactionism' and that if there's anything to be spoken about then it's the symbol and the meaning given to it. And that they have everything to do with the threads that @AlphDoti has given. Then of course, @tycho has been engaged in those threads; so does that mean then he shouldn't participate in them?
Or that a quarantine is required?
One wonders if there's ever a compulsion on one to respond to a post, or one must always be pleased or entertained by a post.
But you can bet by now, I understand how normal threads of Mcreggae's tastes look like; they are the ones that also interest me less, hence which I participate the least. So what is he talking about?
Or what 'fairness' is AlphDoti talking about? It's the same thing that @urstill asked about. AlphDoti would rather put away what's 'unpleasant' for his convinience. He can even choose to ignore a question when it's only reasonable for him to answer.
Now he wants to play the same tactic on threads because he was protected yesterday. Or did he 'hijack' another thread for answering all unanswered questions from the past?
This unfair request by AlphDoti, Mcreggae and others can only be driven by ill will and hypocrisy and motives that only make this forum a nest of the mass man.