a4architect.com wrote:@mucene. The large land owners are mostly early european settler families eg delamere, catholic church and GOK.
Kenyatta family owns very little land compared to these.During the debate @UKenyatta told us he is not among the largest land owners in Kenya, a very true statement.
Could this be a reason that the 'old' mzungu families in Kenya don't make too much noise (pay their taxes, engage in low-key activities and generally remain below the radar)? Those British families that opted to remain in Kenya post-independence (Cholmondeley - yani Delamare, Markham, Fowler, Erskine, etc) always seem to be monied without much evidence of where this income derived.
One just discovers that there's a new exclusive tented camp or beach-front development in which they are involved and the mathavu never seems to add up. Is this a fair assessment of the true situation - i.e., they are large land owners and they actually don't have to work because their income from rent and other land related activities is obscene?
On a related point, I hear that Tom Cholmondeley is a very popular guy amongst his workers and tenants (between Naivasha and Nakuru...). Ati the monster that was depicted in the press was all a creation of the press... may just be a rumour...