wazua Thu, Mar 19, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

2 Pages<12
retrenchments
kyt
#11 Posted : Saturday, January 29, 2011 7:57:20 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 11/7/2007
Posts: 2,182
Those who think its a question of money are mistaken. This is just a question of who makes the biggest profits next yr! Its becomes fashionable to floss abt profits at the expense of the employees! Sad but true.
LOVE WHAT YOU DO, DO WHAT YOU LOVE.
sparkly
#12 Posted : Sunday, January 30, 2011 8:25:12 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 9/23/2009
Posts: 8,083
Location: Enk are Nyirobi
Silly directors just want to show growth in the BS, to safeguard their jobs. I don't see how it will work for BBK who are shackled with huge branch operating costs and not growing their topline by expansion into region.
Life is short. Live passionately.
Papa Investor
#13 Posted : Sunday, January 30, 2011 12:06:25 PM
Rank: New-farer

Joined: 6/3/2010
Posts: 96
its never the best alternatives but CEO's know that it excites the board that they have taken such bold moves...thus extending their own lifetime ...at the expense of small fry!
Sasha
#14 Posted : Monday, January 31, 2011 10:45:38 AM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 9/5/2007
Posts: 627
@kivairu: 'Cost restructuring' does not necessarily mean that the company has no money. It may mean that the company is trying to improve profit, or has realised there are unsustainable and unnecessary costs.

@Intelligentsia: Well said. Staff costs are the easiest and fastest to implement. They also have the most immediate impact on the bottomline. Like you aptly said, management needs to review all cost items before making the cuts. There may be other more strategic cuts to make though whenever a company is restructuring, staff costs most often than not provide an easy alternative!
Mkimwa
#15 Posted : Monday, January 31, 2011 12:02:18 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 10/26/2008
Posts: 380
As for BBK, I think it may be an order from above.. Barclays in the UK is shedding off 1000 employees, so it might be a trickle down effect. This happens especially in multinationals, where the decision to lay off people is made in HQ, and all branches are supposed to implement.

Restructuring can come from two aspects: change of leadership, and cost reduction. For example, change of CEO - the new CEO may have a different structure in mind to improve effeciency. Also, in response to declining sales, management may decide to reduce costs, hence a restructuring.

My experience, whenever someone mentions restructuring, people go home. Not always..but in MOST times, retrenchment will happen.
kivairu
#16 Posted : Monday, January 31, 2011 3:20:56 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 3/5/2008
Posts: 532
Location: Nairobi
@sasha, thanx 4 educating me.

Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value. –Albert Einstein.
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.