wazua Wed, May 7, 2025
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

38 Pages«<1718192021>»
Monica Kimani
Hmmmn
#361 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 4:21:50 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 8/18/2018
Posts: 121
3 young lives are totally messed up for good...6 very sad parents..1 child might grow up with no Mom...A baby may be born in prison...Very unfortunate state of affairs...
Ce n’est pas si grave...
mkenyan
#362 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 8:37:01 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 4/1/2009
Posts: 1,883
murchr wrote:
mkenyan wrote:
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
Is a murder charge really sustainable for Jacque Maribe. Wouldn't a lesser charge be easier to prove, I hope the DPP has sufficient proof although I will be very surprised if he does, as I would be shocked if the lady could have read news of the death of Monica with a straight face if she was involved.


doesn't really matter. she can be charged with murder and after the hearing the judge convicts for a lesser offence of accessory. disregard those theories of 'if she is not convicted of murder she gets away with it.' same way jowi could be charged with murder and gets convicted of manslaughter instead - remember the dola guy?


Dola got Manslaughter because his lawyer proved that he did not plan to kill his wife (malice aforethought; no intent), the prosecutor was not able to show any prove of a plan or intent to kill. He happened to act (snap) after a disagreement. He presented himself to police

Jowi here stole someone's ID and used it to gain entry into her premise (that may be used to show intent to kill)

my point is he was charged with murder but convicted of manslaughter. the court did not acquit him coz murder wasn't proven but instead downgraded it to manslaughter. and my comment was about jackie maribe btw.
mkenyan
#363 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 8:42:11 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 4/1/2009
Posts: 1,883
maka wrote:
murchr wrote:
sitaki.kujulikana wrote:
Angelica _ann wrote:
murchr wrote:
mkenyan wrote:
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
Is a murder charge really sustainable for Jacque Maribe. Wouldn't a lesser charge be easier to prove, I hope the DPP has sufficient proof although I will be very surprised if he does, as I would be shocked if the lady could have read news of the death of Monica with a straight face if she was involved.


doesn't really matter. she can be charged with murder and after the hearing the judge convicts for a lesser offence of accessory. disregard those theories of 'if she is not convicted of murder she gets away with it.' same way jowi could be charged with murder and gets convicted of manslaughter instead - remember the dola guy?


Dola got Manslaughter because his lawyer proved that he did not plan to kill his wife (malice aforethought; no intent), the prosecutor was not able to show any prove of a plan or intent to kill. He happened to act (snap) after a disagreement. He presented himself to police

Jowi here stole someone's ID and used it to gain entry into her premise (that may be used to show intent to kill)


Plus kanzu/cap, plus burn it up, unga plaster, plus ceiling tingz, plus, plus plus plus.

may be the id, kanzu can also be intent to cheat on the fiance, if they can show he was having an affair then the disguise can be explained, especially considering he was engaged to a renown figure, the case might have more twists once it commences, may be the guy is innocent who knows.



Quite true, there will be twists and turns but if Ombeta tries to bring the disguise theory he might introduce the line of thinking that he killed her with the intention of concealing that affair.....and that will clearly define murder.



Ombeta never does a case to conclusion...

you tell them Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly at least obado wisened up and only uses him for pr.
murchr
#364 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 9:12:23 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/26/2012
Posts: 15,980
maka wrote:
murchr wrote:
sitaki.kujulikana wrote:
Angelica _ann wrote:
murchr wrote:
mkenyan wrote:
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
Is a murder charge really sustainable for Jacque Maribe. Wouldn't a lesser charge be easier to prove, I hope the DPP has sufficient proof although I will be very surprised if he does, as I would be shocked if the lady could have read news of the death of Monica with a straight face if she was involved.


doesn't really matter. she can be charged with murder and after the hearing the judge convicts for a lesser offence of accessory. disregard those theories of 'if she is not convicted of murder she gets away with it.' same way jowi could be charged with murder and gets convicted of manslaughter instead - remember the dola guy?


Dola got Manslaughter because his lawyer proved that he did not plan to kill his wife (malice aforethought; no intent), the prosecutor was not able to show any prove of a plan or intent to kill. He happened to act (snap) after a disagreement. He presented himself to police

Jowi here stole someone's ID and used it to gain entry into her premise (that may be used to show intent to kill)


Plus kanzu/cap, plus burn it up, unga plaster, plus ceiling tingz, plus, plus plus plus.

may be the id, kanzu can also be intent to cheat on the fiance, if they can show he was having an affair then the disguise can be explained, especially considering he was engaged to a renown figure, the case might have more twists once it commences, may be the guy is innocent who knows.



Quite true, there will be twists and turns but if Ombeta tries to bring the disguise theory he might introduce the line of thinking that he killed her with the intention of concealing that affair.....and that will clearly define murder.



Ombeta never does a case to conclusion...



We have an example of Moses Dola. Katitu...rem him? You are turning out to be a mythologist @maka where did you drop the wakili hat?
"There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore
.
murchr
#365 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 9:17:28 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/26/2012
Posts: 15,980
mkenyan wrote:
murchr wrote:
mkenyan wrote:
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
Is a murder charge really sustainable for Jacque Maribe. Wouldn't a lesser charge be easier to prove, I hope the DPP has sufficient proof although I will be very surprised if he does, as I would be shocked if the lady could have read news of the death of Monica with a straight face if she was involved.


doesn't really matter. she can be charged with murder and after the hearing the judge convicts for a lesser offence of accessory. disregard those theories of 'if she is not convicted of murder she gets away with it.' same way jowi could be charged with murder and gets convicted of manslaughter instead - remember the dola guy?


Dola got Manslaughter because his lawyer proved that he did not plan to kill his wife (malice aforethought; no intent), the prosecutor was not able to show any prove of a plan or intent to kill. He happened to act (snap) after a disagreement. He presented himself to police

Jowi here stole someone's ID and used it to gain entry into her premise (that may be used to show intent to kill)

my point is he was charged with murder but convicted of manslaughter. the court did not acquit him coz murder wasn't proven but instead downgraded it to manslaughter. and my comment was about jackie maribe btw.



Ref to post 343


(d) an intention by the act or omission to facilitate the flight or escape from custody of any person who has committed or attempted to commit a felony
"There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore
.
mkenyan
#366 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 9:57:10 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 4/1/2009
Posts: 1,883
murchr wrote:
mkenyan wrote:
murchr wrote:
mkenyan wrote:
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
Is a murder charge really sustainable for Jacque Maribe. Wouldn't a lesser charge be easier to prove, I hope the DPP has sufficient proof although I will be very surprised if he does, as I would be shocked if the lady could have read news of the death of Monica with a straight face if she was involved.


doesn't really matter. she can be charged with murder and after the hearing the judge convicts for a lesser offence of accessory. disregard those theories of 'if she is not convicted of murder she gets away with it.' same way jowi could be charged with murder and gets convicted of manslaughter instead - remember the dola guy?


Dola got Manslaughter because his lawyer proved that he did not plan to kill his wife (malice aforethought; no intent), the prosecutor was not able to show any prove of a plan or intent to kill. He happened to act (snap) after a disagreement. He presented himself to police

Jowi here stole someone's ID and used it to gain entry into her premise (that may be used to show intent to kill)

my point is he was charged with murder but convicted of manslaughter. the court did not acquit him coz murder wasn't proven but instead downgraded it to manslaughter. and my comment was about jackie maribe btw.



Ref to post 343


(d) an intention by the act or omission to facilitate the flight or escape from custody of any person who has committed or attempted to commit a felony

section 206 (d) provides for one of the circumstances that constitute malice aforethought and not murder. malice aforethought is just another prerequisite of murder and not the only one. it does not oust mens rea and actus reus.
obiero
#367 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 10:15:40 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 13,618
Location: nairobi
mkenyan wrote:
murchr wrote:
mkenyan wrote:
murchr wrote:
mkenyan wrote:
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
Is a murder charge really sustainable for Jacque Maribe. Wouldn't a lesser charge be easier to prove, I hope the DPP has sufficient proof although I will be very surprised if he does, as I would be shocked if the lady could have read news of the death of Monica with a straight face if she was involved.


doesn't really matter. she can be charged with murder and after the hearing the judge convicts for a lesser offence of accessory. disregard those theories of 'if she is not convicted of murder she gets away with it.' same way jowi could be charged with murder and gets convicted of manslaughter instead - remember the dola guy?


Dola got Manslaughter because his lawyer proved that he did not plan to kill his wife (malice aforethought; no intent), the prosecutor was not able to show any prove of a plan or intent to kill. He happened to act (snap) after a disagreement. He presented himself to police

Jowi here stole someone's ID and used it to gain entry into her premise (that may be used to show intent to kill)

my point is he was charged with murder but convicted of manslaughter. the court did not acquit him coz murder wasn't proven but instead downgraded it to manslaughter. and my comment was about jackie maribe btw.



Ref to post 343


(d) an intention by the act or omission to facilitate the flight or escape from custody of any person who has committed or attempted to commit a felony

section 206 (d) provides for one of the circumstances that constitute malice aforethought and not murder. malice aforethought is just another prerequisite of murder and not the only one. it does not oust mens rea and actus reus.

Irungu goes in for the murder, Maribe gets a slap on the wrist. We discussed this at the spot last night. On Monday Maribe gets bail

COOP 255,000 ABP 15.85; KQ 484,100 ABP 7.45; MTN 23,800 ABP 5.20
Euge
#368 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 10:36:42 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 8/4/2008
Posts: 2,849
Location: Rupi
Jowie and Jacque will be nailed down badly. In the initial investigations, they threatened DCI who were taking down their statements, that they would loose their jobs. The cops had to wait for Kinoti to return from Germany to give instructions for them to proceed. They felt connected to who's who and untouchable. I wish Jacque cooperated from the beginning. Its hard small for her now. Jowie can Rot in hell
Lord, thank you!
mkenyan
#369 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 10:44:19 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 4/1/2009
Posts: 1,883
obiero wrote:
mkenyan wrote:
murchr wrote:
mkenyan wrote:
murchr wrote:
mkenyan wrote:
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
Is a murder charge really sustainable for Jacque Maribe. Wouldn't a lesser charge be easier to prove, I hope the DPP has sufficient proof although I will be very surprised if he does, as I would be shocked if the lady could have read news of the death of Monica with a straight face if she was involved.


doesn't really matter. she can be charged with murder and after the hearing the judge convicts for a lesser offence of accessory. disregard those theories of 'if she is not convicted of murder she gets away with it.' same way jowi could be charged with murder and gets convicted of manslaughter instead - remember the dola guy?


Dola got Manslaughter because his lawyer proved that he did not plan to kill his wife (malice aforethought; no intent), the prosecutor was not able to show any prove of a plan or intent to kill. He happened to act (snap) after a disagreement. He presented himself to police

Jowi here stole someone's ID and used it to gain entry into her premise (that may be used to show intent to kill)

my point is he was charged with murder but convicted of manslaughter. the court did not acquit him coz murder wasn't proven but instead downgraded it to manslaughter. and my comment was about jackie maribe btw.



Ref to post 343


(d) an intention by the act or omission to facilitate the flight or escape from custody of any person who has committed or attempted to commit a felony

section 206 (d) provides for one of the circumstances that constitute malice aforethought and not murder. malice aforethought is just another prerequisite of murder and not the only one. it does not oust mens rea and actus reus.

Irungu goes in for the murder, Maribe gets a slap on the wrist. We discussed this at the spot last night. On Monday Maribe gets bail

she would most likely get bail. there is no compelling reason to deny her bail. and her lawyer will among other reasons play the mother of a 3 year old waiting for her line.
githundi
#370 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 10:50:39 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 11/19/2010
Posts: 1,308
Location: nairobi metropolitan
Lolest! wrote:
MugundaMan wrote:


A father's love wapi?

Where was he when;

1. She was all over the city engaging in partying, ulevi na ulsayqueeni with Jowie and even before Jowie. This is a lady who was clearly painting the town red, getting dead drunk frequently and being picked up at 3 am at tufunny funny clubs where we know nothing good happens. A real father who loves his daughter would not have raised her to live such a hedonistic and immoral lifestyle. It is like the drunkard who knows that their ulevi is bad for their health and safety, but stubbornly keeps drinking for 40 years thinking they have no problem, then one day they get a pain in their stomach and in hosi the doctor tells them they have pancreatic cancer caused by drinking and have a year to live at most! No matter how many tears they shed on themselves at that point hizi ni shida za kujiletea. Where was the father to tell her her lifestyle would bring trouble to her? Was he also in the bar passing out from ulevi so didn't care? This was a terrible father indeed!

2. Where was he when she was busy getting a baby out of wedlock fuaaaa bila mpango? Where was his love? It could have stepped in at this point and told her "Jacque, look, your life is out of control. Close your legs, do the right thing...at the minimum use protection jameni!" What kind of father raised a girl to be like this? Where was the love?


3. Where was he when she was dating all these thugs, married men or no job no income types? Mara oo she is dating this person, then ooo she is dating some politican, then oooo now the jobless Jowie. Was he not concerned about her life to ask the tough questions about what strange characters she was dating? With the scandals all over the news even before Jowie..where was he?

Oh cry me a river baba Maribe! Cry mpaka ujaze ndoo! You were not a loving father at all if you at no point through all these years of turmoil intervened to rescue your baby girl Jacque from herself!

You want to tell us that kids always follow parents' instructions? Did you or do you always follow what your parent wants you to do or not to do?
Hats off Mr Marine! I would stand with my child even if he/she was a Jowir

Nothing saddens me more than when parents keep on providing excuses for their grown up wayward children or a spouse providing excuses for the crimes of their partners in the name of love
Love my foot. ..I thought love was kindness not crime
If your children or spouse commit petty crimes, why not report them to authorities. .otherwise their petty crimes soon graduate to hardcore crimes in their believe that they are always protected/covered
In no time God forbid,and more often than not, they turn on their protectors and so we see headlines of spouses killings each other, children killing their parents and then we wonder where is the world heading to. ..
You shall choose how you bring up your children. ..
You shall choose who is going to be your partners. ..
You shall choose whether to continue livin
with your current partners. .
Remember whatsoever is your decision,
You must lay on the bed you chose. .No excuses please. .
Democracy does not belong to the dead
Liv
#371 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 10:55:21 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 11/14/2006
Posts: 1,311
MugundaMan wrote:


A father's love wapi?

Where was he when;

1. She was all over the city engaging in partying, ulevi na ulsayqueeni with Jowie and even before Jowie. This is a lady who was clearly painting the town red, getting dead drunk frequently and being picked up at 3 am at tufunny funny clubs where we know nothing good happens. A real father who loves his daughter would not have raised her to live such a hedonistic and immoral lifestyle. It is like the drunkard who knows that their ulevi is bad for their health and safety, but stubbornly keeps drinking for 40 years thinking they have no problem, then one day they get a pain in their stomach and in hosi the doctor tells them they have pancreatic cancer caused by drinking and have a year to live at most! No matter how many tears they shed on themselves at that point hizi ni shida za kujiletea. Where was the father to tell her her lifestyle would bring trouble to her? Was he also in the bar passing out from ulevi so didn't care? This was a terrible father indeed!

2. Where was he when she was busy getting a baby out of wedlock fuaaaa bila mpango? Where was his love? It could have stepped in at this point and told her "Jacque, look, your life is out of control. Close your legs, do the right thing...at the minimum use protection jameni!" What kind of father raised a girl to be like this? Where was the love?


3. Where was he when she was dating all these thugs, married men or no job no income types? Mara oo she is dating this person, then ooo she is dating some politican, then oooo now the jobless Jowie. Was he not concerned about her life to ask the tough questions about what strange characters she was dating? With the scandals all over the news even before Jowie..where was he?

Oh cry me a river baba Maribe! Cry mpaka ujaze ndoo! You were not a loving father at all if you at no point through all these years of turmoil intervened to rescue your baby girl Jacque from herself!



C&P
If the promises of God included an iron clad guarantee that children reared rightly by godly parents will absolutely remain in the faith as adults, this would strip those children of their freedom to choose. Free will is given by God to every human being. The way many people understand and speak of proverb 22:6 therefore, contradicts one of the fundamental truths of the plan of God: free will or freedom of choice. It is a doctrinal error.

One simply cannot twist the verse to mean if one rears children properly, then God guarantees they willchoose the right path. Guaranteeing someone will make a choice cannot be done without God taking the freedom to choose out of the hands of every child reared by believing parents.








obiero
#372 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 11:13:47 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 13,618
Location: nairobi
Liv wrote:
MugundaMan wrote:


A father's love wapi?

Where was he when;

1. She was all over the city engaging in partying, ulevi na ulsayqueeni with Jowie and even before Jowie. This is a lady who was clearly painting the town red, getting dead drunk frequently and being picked up at 3 am at tufunny funny clubs where we know nothing good happens. A real father who loves his daughter would not have raised her to live such a hedonistic and immoral lifestyle. It is like the drunkard who knows that their ulevi is bad for their health and safety, but stubbornly keeps drinking for 40 years thinking they have no problem, then one day they get a pain in their stomach and in hosi the doctor tells them they have pancreatic cancer caused by drinking and have a year to live at most! No matter how many tears they shed on themselves at that point hizi ni shida za kujiletea. Where was the father to tell her her lifestyle would bring trouble to her? Was he also in the bar passing out from ulevi so didn't care? This was a terrible father indeed!

2. Where was he when she was busy getting a baby out of wedlock fuaaaa bila mpango? Where was his love? It could have stepped in at this point and told her "Jacque, look, your life is out of control. Close your legs, do the right thing...at the minimum use protection jameni!" What kind of father raised a girl to be like this? Where was the love?


3. Where was he when she was dating all these thugs, married men or no job no income types? Mara oo she is dating this person, then ooo she is dating some politican, then oooo now the jobless Jowie. Was he not concerned about her life to ask the tough questions about what strange characters she was dating? With the scandals all over the news even before Jowie..where was he?

Oh cry me a river baba Maribe! Cry mpaka ujaze ndoo! You were not a loving father at all if you at no point through all these years of turmoil intervened to rescue your baby girl Jacque from herself!



C&P
If the promises of God included an iron clad guarantee that children reared rightly by godly parents will absolutely remain in the faith as adults, this would strip those children of their freedom to choose. Free will is given by God to every human being. The way many people understand and speak of proverb 22:6 therefore, contradicts one of the fundamental truths of the plan of God: free will or freedom of choice. It is a doctrinal error.

One simply cannot twist the verse to mean if one rears children properly, then God guarantees they willchoose the right path. Guaranteeing someone will make a choice cannot be done without God taking the freedom to choose out of the hands of every child reared by believing parents.

All said and done.. A good parent, especially the mother would have a clue on whether his/her child could actually tie someone up and slit the throat.. At least I am certain that I would never do such a thing and my parents know it

COOP 255,000 ABP 15.85; KQ 484,100 ABP 7.45; MTN 23,800 ABP 5.20
tycho
#373 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 11:31:38 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Over drinking and unruliness may be a symptom of a disturbed mind. How does it feel, or even what does it imply for us to be aloof at the suffering of others simply because we're more 'Godly'?

How did we get to be so cold and indifferent to the human condition?
obiero
#374 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 11:40:13 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 13,618
Location: nairobi
tycho wrote:
Over drinking and unruliness may be a symptom of a disturbed mind. How does it feel, or even what does it imply for us to be aloof at the suffering of others simply because we're more 'Godly'?

How did we get to be so cold and indifferent to the human condition?

Indeed it's wrong to be indifferent to both the deceased or accused

COOP 255,000 ABP 15.85; KQ 484,100 ABP 7.45; MTN 23,800 ABP 5.20
tycho
#375 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 11:41:45 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
A human's love, even if a father's one is never perfect. Those who near perfection must be aware of their unconscious and must be in harmony with it.

Otherwise, don't forget the genes. The information you put into your genes is probabilistic. So you may not slit or may have not slit anyone's throat yet, but you may never know if you're ever going to do it.

The little experience with humanity is that for most, it's just that the opportunity for crime hasn't arisen, otherwise there's a criminal in most people, starting with our very selves.

Finally, there's no proof beyond reasonable doubt, that Jowie did it. Why are we in a hurry to judge? The answer is easy to see, anything that directs attention from ourselves sells.

I like an imperfect father who'll still be there for a daughter or son in dire straits. Even if that father is a clumsy profiler...
obiero
#376 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 12:13:21 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 13,618
Location: nairobi
tycho wrote:
A human's love, even if a father's one is never perfect. Those who near perfection must be aware of their unconscious and must be in harmony with it.

Otherwise, don't forget the genes. The information you put into your genes is probabilistic. So you may not slit or may have not slit anyone's throat yet, but you may never know if you're ever going to do it.

The little experience with humanity is that for most, it's just that the opportunity for crime hasn't arisen, otherwise there's a criminal in most people, starting with our very selves.

Finally, there's no proof beyond reasonable doubt, that Jowie did it. Why are we in a hurry to judge? The answer is easy to see, anything that directs attention from ourselves sells.

I like an imperfect father who'll still be there for a daughter or son in dire straits. Even if that father is a clumsy profiler...

@tycho surely you need to get serious.. are you saying that you can murder a person in cold blood.. that there's a gene that can drive you to do such

COOP 255,000 ABP 15.85; KQ 484,100 ABP 7.45; MTN 23,800 ABP 5.20
tycho
#377 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 12:26:36 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
obiero wrote:
tycho wrote:
A human's love, even if a father's one is never perfect. Those who near perfection must be aware of their unconscious and must be in harmony with it.

Otherwise, don't forget the genes. The information you put into your genes is probabilistic. So you may not slit or may have not slit anyone's throat yet, but you may never know if you're ever going to do it.

The little experience with humanity is that for most, it's just that the opportunity for crime hasn't arisen, otherwise there's a criminal in most people, starting with our very selves.

Finally, there's no proof beyond reasonable doubt, that Jowie did it. Why are we in a hurry to judge? The answer is easy to see, anything that directs attention from ourselves sells.

I like an imperfect father who'll still be there for a daughter or son in dire straits. Even if that father is a clumsy profiler...

@tycho surely you need to get serious.. are you saying that you can murder a person in cold blood.. that there's a gene that can drive you to do such


I believe so. We only need to begin by looking at the sample of psychopaths and their parents.

Or even how language is learnt and developed, bearing in mind how or what science is telling us about how a human works. A computational type may show different behaviors in different circumstances...

BTW, I suspect that genetics has yet been unearthed to significant proportion. It seems we may have just scratched the surface. But we know that jpeg files etc. may be stored genetically. What does that mean?
MugundaMan
#378 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 1:05:06 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 1/8/2018
Posts: 2,211
Location: DC (Dustbowl County)
Liv wrote:

C&P
If the promises of God included an iron clad guarantee that children reared rightly by godly parents will absolutely remain in the faith as adults, this would strip those children of their freedom to choose. Free will is given by God to every human being. The way many people understand and speak of proverb 22:6 therefore, contradicts one of the fundamental truths of the plan of God: free will or freedom of choice. It is a doctrinal error.

One simply cannot twist the verse to mean if one rears children properly, then God guarantees they willchoose the right path. Guaranteeing someone will make a choice cannot be done without God taking the freedom to choose out of the hands of every child reared by believing parents.



@Liv

Sema doctrinal error in YOUR opinion. I see no doctrinal "error" or contradiction there. Remember numerous Scriptures talk about most believers being preordained and predestined and chosen before the foundation of the world. However in His mercy and wisdom those who may not have been chosen from day 1 are never turned away if they humble themselves, deny self and believe (John 6:37). So it appears there is a dual-path to Christ. The pre-ordained (some would call it the Calvinist) path, and the "free will" path you allude to. Proverbs 22:6 is an iron clad guarantee that if a child is not on the pre-ordained path, they can be trained to be on the free-will path to redemption in Christ.

Your understanding of what "free will" is might be where you go wrong IMHO. The earth and the universe are the Lord's and He is Sovereign over them all (Psalm 24:1) and on judgment day, as you know, every knee shall bow and confess His name, believers or not! Free will under His dominion does not mean everybody is entitled to do what they want whenever they want - ask Satan! It is not a right or an entitlement, except when viewed through a flawed earthly lens. It is a simply an availability of a choice to rebel against God, something all have done since Adam (Rom 3:23). That limited "right" He gave --even in heaven--- to Satan, who chose it gleefully and is now suffering the eternal consequences thereof.

So when a child who may not have been pre-ordained is trained to humble themselves before the Lord and believe, this is good and right and honourable in God's eyes, because He is sovereign over all; even over Satan as the book of Job proves, and the outcome of said training done correctly by real believers (not fake ones) is as good as cast in stone.

But of course to those who do not believe in Him and His sure Word, like Satan before them, they will find this "impossible" or wrong and dictatorial and their "free will" to rebel against Him is a "right" that will not be denied to them smile Shalom.
murchr
#379 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 1:18:12 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/26/2012
Posts: 15,980
mkenyan wrote:
murchr wrote:
mkenyan wrote:
murchr wrote:
mkenyan wrote:
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
Is a murder charge really sustainable for Jacque Maribe. Wouldn't a lesser charge be easier to prove, I hope the DPP has sufficient proof although I will be very surprised if he does, as I would be shocked if the lady could have read news of the death of Monica with a straight face if she was involved.


doesn't really matter. she can be charged with murder and after the hearing the judge convicts for a lesser offence of accessory. disregard those theories of 'if she is not convicted of murder she gets away with it.' same way jowi could be charged with murder and gets convicted of manslaughter instead - remember the dola guy?


Dola got Manslaughter because his lawyer proved that he did not plan to kill his wife (malice aforethought; no intent), the prosecutor was not able to show any prove of a plan or intent to kill. He happened to act (snap) after a disagreement. He presented himself to police

Jowi here stole someone's ID and used it to gain entry into her premise (that may be used to show intent to kill)

my point is he was charged with murder but convicted of manslaughter. the court did not acquit him coz murder wasn't proven but instead downgraded it to manslaughter. and my comment was about jackie maribe btw.



Ref to post 343


(d) an intention by the act or omission to facilitate the flight or escape from custody of any person who has committed or attempted to commit a felony


section 206 (d) provides for one of the circumstances that constitute malice aforethought and not murder. malice aforethought is just another prerequisite of murder and not the only one. it does not oust mens rea and actus reus.


Yes and malice aforethought is the prerequisite to murder. So she will need to refutes the fact she did not facilitate the flight someone who had committed a felony.
"There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore
.
Hmmmn
#380 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2018 4:13:08 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 8/18/2018
Posts: 121
Pray tell me, is this what I hear true?

I am not one to gossip but I am shook...This was told to a group of us at some relaxation spot...One of the accused is seeing things and talking to people who are not there...Me thinks it is a strategy to get out of this mess...If someone did the crime they need to do the time..

Like I noted earlier this saga cannot get any stranger...However the bearer of this moshene is sometimes too dramatic and exaggerates stufff...Sometimes His moshene is 90% true...Seep this tea with caution...

As a parent ...I pray for my kids it is a cruel,deceitful and dangerous world...Hug my kids a lot more these days...
Ce n’est pas si grave...
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
38 Pages«<1718192021>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2025 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.