wazua Thu, Mar 19, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

26 Pages«<1617181920>»
syokimau
sceptic
#171 Posted : Wednesday, November 16, 2011 3:21:03 PM
Rank: New-farer

Joined: 7/18/2010
Posts: 12
Location: nairobi
Barrywhite wrote:
@sceptic. The area in which demolitions took place is actually called Ungani; although the media widely reportedly it as Syokimau. Whereas the GOK can take any land anywhere they want (according to the law), where you are genuinely the owner of the land, you would be compensated. So you should be verifying the authencity of your title - l am assuming you have one. If verified, then you are safe. Any compulsory acquisition would compensate you both for the value of your property and the disturbance occasioned by you moving; and give you enough time to move! Still what happened in Ungani over the weekend was heartless and cannot be excused.

yap,i do have a clean title,just wanted get another opinion.
the people selling ungani and jumbo used the name syokimau to lure the buyers.
ecstacy
#172 Posted : Wednesday, November 16, 2011 3:23:23 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 2/26/2008
Posts: 4,449
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
ecstacy wrote:
After watching the deliberations in Parliament yesterday and facts as presented by the Lands Minister and Transport Minister, I have to agree the truth likely is with KAA.

The title deed in KAA's name, a map confirming territory boundary as KAA described it, court orders stopping construction back in 2004/5

COMPARED TO

Letters purporting to originate from Lands Ministry as written by an official suspended at the time of writing due to scandal with the Mayor's house, a letter allegedly written by Mr Orengo with his forged signature etc...If this is how the residents ended up with 'title deeds', they are obviously fake.

The Lands Minister even said he was willing to appear in camera and provide names of MP's who have used their govt positions to 'allocate' govt land and are now quite emotive on this demolitions as compared to any other due to their involvement or that of their friends or family.

The Lands Minister and Transport Minister both sought to state that the individuals concerned at various points are known and prosecution be carried out.

The House Committees have this evidence to begin with.




My problem is this:

- Why didn't KAA secure this land in 2004 when the people started invading it, why wait for 7 years to demolish the properties after people have resold the lands to innocent kenyans who then spent millions developing them.
- Is every Kenyan supposed to know how Orengo's signature looks like so he can be able to tell when they see a fake?
- If the minister knows the people who were involved in the shady lands deal, why does he need to appear in camera, why can't he name them on the floor of the house.


- KAA got orders stopping any property development on this land. Notice was issued. When push then came to shove, ignorance is not a defence.

- Don't you wonder what informed the Judge to issue orders preventing development on this land?...

- He was not there to mention their names. As an Honorable Member of Parliament, simply naming people without adducing evidence to support your claims is not in compliance with house rules.
ecstacy
#173 Posted : Wednesday, November 16, 2011 3:28:48 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 2/26/2008
Posts: 4,449
What we have above is a systemic collapse. Kenyan citizenry as chain end buyers remain collateral damage until we have nothing short of a systemic overhaul, actors and process.
lynx
#174 Posted : Wednesday, November 16, 2011 3:57:04 PM
Rank: New-farer

Joined: 11/15/2011
Posts: 25
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
ecstacy wrote:
After watching the deliberations in Parliament yesterday and facts as presented by the Lands Minister and Transport Minister, I have to agree the truth likely is with KAA.

The title deed in KAA's name, a map confirming territory boundary as KAA described it, court orders stopping construction back in 2004/5

COMPARED TO

Letters purporting to originate from Lands Ministry as written by an official suspended at the time of writing due to scandal with the Mayor's house, a letter allegedly written by Mr Orengo with his forged signature etc...If this is how the residents ended up with 'title deeds', they are obviously fake.

The Lands Minister even said he was willing to appear in camera and provide names of MP's who have used their govt positions to 'allocate' govt land and are now quite emotive on this demolitions as compared to any other due to their involvement or that of their friends or family.

The Lands Minister and Transport Minister both sought to state that the individuals concerned at various points are known and prosecution be carried out.

The House Committees have this evidence to begin with.




My problem is this:

- Why didn't KAA secure this land in 2004 when the people started invading it, why wait for 7 years to demolish the properties after people have resold the lands to innocent kenyans who then spent millions developing them.
- Is every Kenyan supposed to know how Orengo's signature looks like so he can be able to tell when they see a fake?
- If the minister knows the people who were involved in the shady lands deal, why does he need to appear in camera, why can't he name them on the floor of the house.



I agree but KAA facts do not add up to me, I took the co-ordinates presented on this forum on where the demolitions took place.d'oh! Liar

When I compared the final look to the Nairobi County Map there was a disconnect.I fear the KAA /Orengo map is not correct as it goes into Machakos/Mavoko county.Shame on you

Seems to me the Mavoko mayor was right,the fake guys at lands did a new "genuine map"Brick wall

What we need is a solution on all fake titles and accountability from lands and compensation where government "mavoko council" approved the constructions.

We need digital records available to the public NOW.. and the whole story ends


If you knew that candlelight is fire then the meal was cooked a long time ago.
Nobby
#175 Posted : Wednesday, November 16, 2011 4:16:59 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 2/8/2007
Posts: 625
Location: Nairobi
If someone wants to buy land that has a Certificate of Title from the Ministry of Lands, located near the "white House" in Syokimau would you advice him to go ahead?
The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams.
Barrywhite
#176 Posted : Wednesday, November 16, 2011 4:37:53 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 12/2/2009
Posts: 286
Location: Nairobi
@ Nobby ... confirm the authencity of the certificate of title, the duration of time remaining on the lease, and if its authentic and has sufficient time for you, you follow the laid down procedure to acquire. Certificate of Title is the final document you get for a leasehold. you get Title deeds for a freehold. Syokimau is a leasehold.
The laudable is more often than not rendered laughable by overclaim
Jus Blazin
#177 Posted : Wednesday, November 16, 2011 5:05:29 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/23/2008
Posts: 3,966
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
jamplu wrote:
The Minister alleged that all title deeds if any allocated to the same land are fake he also suggested that other allocated in other areas in mavoko were fake and in some other cases multiple titles issued to same piece of land
am just wondering if you camped at the lands office went through all processes and had that title deed issued to you by a land registration officer then kusema tu ukweli are we safe buying land anywhere around mavoko.
How is the market doing around Mavoko??


I really recent Orengo's management style, how is saying that the titles are fake helping the situation. In all the time he has been in that lands ministry, I have never heard him mention anything forward looking, his is to defend past errors and mediocrity by his officials
- how about he comments about the Kenyans who just saw their futures changed forever?
- How about telling us how fake titles are produced and what he plans to do to ensure kenyans don't lose their lifes work in future?
- How about he educates Kenyans on how to correctly go about acquiring land and how to identify fake titles or procedures to ensure one buys genuine land?

He is trully lost in the management and should go back to the back benches where he can shout himself hoarse as an opposition politician.

This is the problem of rewarding activists with cabinet positions.
Luck is when Preparation meets Opportunity. ~ Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Nobby
#178 Posted : Wednesday, November 16, 2011 5:16:02 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 2/8/2007
Posts: 625
Location: Nairobi
Barrywhite wrote:
@ Nobby ... confirm the authencity of the certificate of title, the duration of time remaining on the lease, and if its authentic and has sufficient time for you, you follow the laid down procedure to acquire. Certificate of Title is the final document you get for a leasehold. you get Title deeds for a freehold. Syokimau is a leasehold.



With this Syokimau issue is it still safe?
The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams.
addidaskawembe
#179 Posted : Wednesday, November 16, 2011 6:00:30 PM
Rank: New-farer

Joined: 5/14/2010
Posts: 84
Location: Nairobi
ecstacy wrote:
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
ecstacy wrote:
After watching the deliberations in Parliament yesterday and facts as presented by the Lands Minister and Transport Minister, I have to agree the truth likely is with KAA.

The title deed in KAA's name, a map confirming territory boundary as KAA described it, court orders stopping construction back in 2004/5

COMPARED TO

Letters purporting to originate from Lands Ministry as written by an official suspended at the time of writing due to scandal with the Mayor's house, a letter allegedly written by Mr Orengo with his forged signature etc...If this is how the residents ended up with 'title deeds', they are obviously fake.

The Lands Minister even said he was willing to appear in camera and provide names of MP's who have used their govt positions to 'allocate' govt land and are now quite emotive on this demolitions as compared to any other due to their involvement or that of their friends or family.

The Lands Minister and Transport Minister both sought to state that the individuals concerned at various points are known and prosecution be carried out.

The House Committees have this evidence to begin with.




My problem is this:

- Why didn't KAA secure this land in 2004 when the people started invading it, why wait for 7 years to demolish the properties after people have resold the lands to innocent kenyans who then spent millions developing them.
- Is every Kenyan supposed to know how Orengo's signature looks like so he can be able to tell when they see a fake?
- If the minister knows the people who were involved in the shady lands deal, why does he need to appear in camera, why can't he name them on the floor of the house.


- KAA got orders stopping any property development on this land. Notice was issued. When push then came to shove, ignorance is not a defence.

- Don't you wonder what informed the Judge to issue orders preventing development on this land?...

- He was not there to mention their names. As an Honorable Member of Parliament, simply naming people without adducing evidence to support your claims is not in compliance with house rules.


@ecstacy..take your time and use google earth to see where this land and you will understand why something just doesn't add up.

1. Its perpendicular to JKIA fence and stretches 2kms with a road on its left up to Syokimau-Katani Road.

2. There are plots on the left of this contentious plot separated from this plot by a road which isn't straight.

3. This is not a flight path unless they plan to construct another runway of which it won't be logical because JKIA would form an 'L' making it even more insecure.

4. This area is in Machakos and not Nrb, and if there was any claim by KAA, Mavoko should have been involved.

In summary, the entire system was compromised to benefit a few individuals at the expense of the buyers.

I'm not surprised that Orengo wants to give names in camera and he even said that the guy in his ministry who signed the titles was on suspension when he signed them.

What did he do when he discovered this chap had signed and issued titles ?
How many titles have been issued with similar problems ?
NB: KAA claims ownership and so do the occupants because both groups have legal documents to back.
a4architect.com
#180 Posted : Wednesday, November 16, 2011 6:06:59 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 1/4/2010
Posts: 1,668
Location: nairobi
this is the same catastrophe that befalls kenyans every time a building collapses. Kenyans blame each other for a while and get lost in the maze they create while at it.
The simplest solutions to these problems is not to reinvent the wheel but borrow heavily laws from developed countries even if it means complete cut-paste word for word.
Issuance of titles should be done by Mavoko under collaboration with ministry of lands, Machakos, not headquaters.
This way, Mavoko council will be able to approve buildings which they can ascertain rightful ownership since they hold the files.
This is what happens in developed countries.Once an approval is granted and construction is complete, the house owner has full right of ownership since Govt. approved the construction and did not stop him during construction period.
In Kenya, the local authorities absolve themselves by adding the 'Approved subject to land having no encumbrances' clause.
Some smart lawyer should challenge this clause ,setting a precedence hence making Kenya a better country to live in.
As Iron Sharpens Iron, So one Man Sharpens Another.
26 Pages«<1617181920>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.