Science of social networks - Page 16 - Life - Wazua

Welcome Guest

Wazua » Club SK » Life » Science of social networks

Science of social networks

Options

Previous Topic · Next Topic

Swenani		#151 Posted : Thursday, July 17, 2014 4:31:03 PM
Rank: User Joined: 8/15/2013 Posts: 13,237 Location: Vacuum		Why I quit Facebook Open letter to Mark Zuckerberg If Obiero did it, Who Am I?
Back to top		WWW \|
User Profile

Muriel		#152 Posted : Thursday, July 17, 2014 4:34:41 PM
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142		Swenani, How pleasant it is to see you! Nice read!
Back to top		\|

tycho		#153 Posted : Thursday, July 17, 2014 4:46:59 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi		Muriel wrote: I do not understand what you are asking. Kindly rephrase. In 'this' network, how are ignorance and knowledge distributed, and how and by whom or what, is this distribution and flow regulated?
Back to top		\|
User Profile

Muriel		#154 Posted : Thursday, July 17, 2014 4:52:46 PM
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142		tycho wrote: Muriel wrote: I do not understand what you are asking. Kindly rephrase. In 'this' network, how are ignorance and knowledge distributed, and how and by whom or what, is this distribution and flow regulated? A 'cluster bomb' question! thence I did not understand it! First are we talking about the same network? The 'this' network.
Back to top		\|

tycho		#155 Posted : Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:15:25 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi		Swenani wrote: Why I quit Facebook Open letter to Mark Zuckerberg The writer wants a better Facebook. Why? Isn't it reasonable that the users need to play a positive role in creating a better Facebook? How is responsibility and power distributed in a network? Do users have adequate digital and cultural education to use such networks? Surely, expecting a network to be about the simple functions like meeting lost friends, the network provides infinite opportunity for infinite activities. How do we find a balance?
Back to top		\|
User Profile

tycho		#156 Posted : Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:19:13 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi		Muriel wrote: tycho wrote: Muriel wrote: I do not understand what you are asking. Kindly rephrase. In 'this' network, how are ignorance and knowledge distributed, and how and by whom or what, is this distribution and flow regulated? A 'cluster bomb' question! thence I did not understand it! First are we talking about the same network? The 'this' network. Could we be talking of different networks?
Back to top		\|
User Profile

symbols		#157 Posted : Thursday, July 17, 2014 6:13:51 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552		‘Snowden should be praised, not prosecuted’ – UN rights watchdog
Back to top		\|
User Profile

symbols		#158 Posted : Thursday, July 17, 2014 6:23:59 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2013 Posts: 2,552		Armed with Twitter, Clinton seeks new information war Journalism groups blast Obama admin for ‘politically driven suppression of news’
Back to top		\|
User Profile

tycho		#159 Posted : Thursday, July 17, 2014 7:01:26 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi		http://www.theguardian.c...-communications-nsa-spy Dynamic 'network languages'?
Back to top		\| \| Edit by user: Thursday, July 17, 2014 7:04 PM \| Reason: Not specified
User Profile

Wakanyugi		#160 Posted : Thursday, July 17, 2014 11:31:53 PM
Rank: Veteran Joined: 7/3/2007 Posts: 1,635		Muriel wrote: Wakanyugi wrote: Muriel wrote: I have tried to introduce Keanu Reeves's Matrix movie into this discussion of networking for the specific reason it dealt with the illusory human perception of reality which is based on the habitual day to day choices people make in the world they live in and the need to break free from "this" world and make new choices. I am saddened that my spark has not kindled any fire. Don't be sad. I introduced the Holographic theory partly in response to your early reference to 'The Matrix.' The Wachovya brothers partly based their film plot on this theory and of course science fiction. But the point is the same: the world we see is not real. It is a hologram, an illusion, projected by a 'master programmer.' Our senses cheat us that it is real. Of course Hollywood needs excitement so they had to have kick ass fight sequences; a bunch of villains and a love interest to spice things up. The simple fact is you are the Master programmer; the software is 'Consciousness' and the hardware is the Singularity. It was a favourite film and I watched, nay, studied it several times over. On the face of it, it is about escaping the realm to attain higher status. I agree about your observations about it though I don't agree with it. What is it you don't agree with? *"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth."* (Niels Bohr)
Back to top		\|
User Profile

26 Pages«<1415161718>»

Wazua » Club SK » Life » Science of social networks

Forum Jump

You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Watch this topic
Print this topic

Normal
Threaded