Cde Monomotapa wrote:ike wrote:obiero wrote:Cde Monomotapa wrote:ike wrote:TheGeek wrote:Did I just hear ngunze state on national tv that KQ is hedging up to 80% of their fuel budget and their bill is higher than current fuel prices.
kq should do away with hedging that has consistently made them losses. and anyway who couldn't guess fuel prices were going down with all these oil deposits discovery everywhere.
A credibility issue arose to me btwn the annual report & bloggers, whereby the last annual report indicated 51% hedge to Mar. 2015. So when were the 80% hedges done? Since I'd like to rely more on the annual report..
At 80% hedge then it means for every 100 bob KQ spent on fuel it is now spending 90 bob? A wild guess of efficiency of the 'youngest fleet in Africa' of 15% gives 67.5 bob.
Heh, the fuel drop is/was the easiest trick in the book. Now, it will take deep scalping. Those new routes better be worth the hustle.
Let's see.
Btw, ngunze admitted that they have leeway to hedge upto 80%, not that they had hedged by that margin
of course that was only a polite way of giving light to the current situation which he admits is bad. He even mentioned they can hedge from 2 months to 1 year. A bad situation with good leadership is only temporary so take heart... but stop adding.
@Obiero, thanks. Noted that. There is a past annual report that has the breakdown disclosed. OK. This thread is just spawning into Club SK quality. Wale wamekata kura, wamekata shauri.
@ Cde, these are figures in 2012/2013 & 2013/2014 Annual Reports.
(ii) Jet fuel price risk
The Group’s fuel risk management strategy aims to provide the airline with protection against sudden and significant increases
in oil prices. To meet this objective, the Company uses fuel hedges within approved limits and with approved counterparties
accordingly. There were derivative financial instruments held to manage fuel price risk at 31 March 2014. As at 31 March 2014
the Group had in place fuel hedging contracts for 51 percent of its anticipated fuel requirements for the period up to 31 March
2015 and 27 percent of anticipated fuel requirements for the period to 31 March 2016.
The following sensitivity analysis shows how profit and equity would change if the fuel price had been different with all other
variables held constant.
2014 2013
Kshs million Kshs million Kshs million Kshs million
Effect on profit Effect on equity Effect on profit Effect on equity
Fuel price
-1% Movement 398 398 414 414
+1% Movement (398) (398) (414) (414)
(ii) Jet fuel price risk
The Group’s fuel risk management strategy aims to
provide the airline with protection against sudden and
significant increases in oil prices. To meet this objective,
the Company uses fuel hedges within approved limits
and with approved counterparties accordingly. There
were derivative financial instruments held to manage
fuel price risk at 31 March 2013. As at 31 March 2013
the Group had in place fuel hedging contracts for 80
percent of its anticipated fuel requirements for the
period up to 31 March 2014 and 36 percent of anticipated
fuel requirements for the period to 31 March 2015.
The following sensitivity analysis shows how profit and
equity would change if the fuel price had been different
with all other variables held constant.
2013 2012
Kshs million Kshs million Kshs million Kshs million
Effect on Effect on Effect on Effect on
profit equity profit equity
Fuel price
-1% Movement 414 414 407 407
+1% Movement (414) (414) (407) (407)