Wazua
»
Investor
»
Stocks
»
Elliott Wave Analysis Of The NSE 20
Rank: Veteran Joined: 1/20/2011 Posts: 1,820 Location: Nakuru
|
Angelica _ann wrote:Ericsson wrote:Fyatu wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:ARM anyone?????????? I am looking for FY 2017. Where can i find these?? Not yet released;things are thick. 6.45 Wololo yaye! Investing in the stock market is not for the faint hearted... wazua proverbDumb money becomes dumb only when it listens to smart money
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 7/7/2009 Posts: 41
|
Fyatu wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:Ericsson wrote:Fyatu wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:ARM anyone?????????? I am looking for FY 2017. Where can i find these?? Not yet released;things are thick. 6.45 Wololo yaye! Investing in the stock market is not for the faint hearted... wazua proverb They requested for an extension of 1 month to report 2017. Grab some popcorn quot; quot; Happiness is not the absence of problems, It's the ability to deal with them
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/23/2009 Posts: 13,541 Location: nairobi
|
Juojo wrote:Fyatu wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:Ericsson wrote:Fyatu wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:ARM anyone?????????? I am looking for FY 2017. Where can i find these?? Not yet released;things are thick. 6.45 Wololo yaye! Investing in the stock market is not for the faint hearted... wazua proverb They requested for an extension of 1 month to report 2017. Grab some popcorn quot; quot; Are there people expecting a profit or what? The firm stated clearly that results would dip further in the red by upto 25% HF 90,000 ABP 3.83; KQ 414,100 ABP 7.92; MTN 23,800 ABP 6.45
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 8/28/2015 Posts: 1,247
|
obiero wrote:Juojo wrote:Fyatu wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:Ericsson wrote:Fyatu wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:ARM anyone?????????? I am looking for FY 2017. Where can i find these?? Not yet released;things are thick. 6.45 Wololo yaye! Investing in the stock market is not for the faint hearted... wazua proverb They requested for an extension of 1 month to report 2017. Grab some popcorn quot; quot; Are there people expecting a profit or what? The firm stated clearly that results would dip further in the red by upto 25% Someone here was enthusiastic with this one at mp of around 13/=. I hope hiyo bucket yake had holes otherwise, Jamaa is wailling and cursing someplace somewhere. Sometimes, I practice shoot and forget approache in this market. Otherwise, ulcers would kill me. ,Behold, a sower went forth to sow;....
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/7/2012 Posts: 11,908
|
muandiwambeu wrote:obiero wrote:Juojo wrote:Fyatu wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:Ericsson wrote:Fyatu wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:ARM anyone?????????? I am looking for FY 2017. Where can i find these?? Not yet released;things are thick. 6.45 Wololo yaye! Investing in the stock market is not for the faint hearted... wazua proverb They requested for an extension of 1 month to report 2017. Grab some popcorn quot; quot; Are there people expecting a profit or what? The firm stated clearly that results would dip further in the red by upto 25% Someone here was enthusiastic with this one at mp of around 13/=. I hope hiyo bucket yake had holes otherwise, Jamaa is wailling and cursing someplace somewhere. Sometimes, I practice shoot and forget approache in this market. Otherwise, ulcers would kill me. @pesa 8, you sold grudgingly at 15, we saved your skin boss!!! In the business world, everyone is paid in two coins - cash and experience. Take the experience first; the cash will come later - H Geneen
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 5/25/2012 Posts: 4,105 Location: 08c
|
Angelica _ann wrote:@pesa 8, you sold grudgingly at 15, we saved your skin boss!!! Idiot is right back @6.60 Pesa Nane plans to be shilingi when he grows up.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/7/2012 Posts: 11,908
|
Pesa Nane wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:@pesa 8, you sold grudgingly at 15, we saved your skin boss!!! Idiot is right back @6.60 Almost got back jana @+7 lakini I asked & was warned not to try. Let me wait kidogo. Tempted!!! In the business world, everyone is paid in two coins - cash and experience. Take the experience first; the cash will come later - H Geneen
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/11/2012 Posts: 5,222
|
Angelica _ann wrote:Pesa Nane wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:@pesa 8, you sold grudgingly at 15, we saved your skin boss!!! Idiot is right back @6.60 Almost got back jana @+7 lakini I asked & was warned not to try. Let me wait kidogo. Tempted!!! ARM reminds me of @Hisah, when it was in its 20s. Those were tough times. @Karasinga okoa'd jahazi back then
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 9/23/2009 Posts: 8,083 Location: Enk are Nyirobi
|
Angelica _ann wrote:Pesa Nane wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:@pesa 8, you sold grudgingly at 15, we saved your skin boss!!! Idiot is right back @6.60 Almost got back jana @+7 lakini I asked & was warned not to try. Let me wait kidogo. Tempted!!! Technically insolvent. Anyone buying should be ready for further dilution by debt conversions and new share issues. Life is short. Live passionately.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/11/2006 Posts: 2,304
|
THE POWER OF ELLIOTT WAVES AND SOCIONOMICS
If you study carefully the two charts/images and especially between the years 2007 - 2012 you'll come to appreciate the unique qualities of Elliott Waves and Socionomics. But that is only if you don't get blinded by the economics literature you have studied and come to accept as default. Also, your primitive brain (this is a scientific word, sio matusi) aka basal ganglia can blind you from seeing and accepting this evidence of superiority of Elliott. So, this is how it goes: Btw 2007 -2009, the Safcom price chart shows the stock price was falling in value. The same thing(falling profits) is shown in the Profits chart (it is subtle and you may need to look closely). Btw 2009 - 2010 the stock price rose in value to about 6/=. The same goes for profits which shows a bump in 2010. Btw 2010 -2012 again Safcom price fell in price to about 3/=. The profits mirrored this by falling in value btw 2010 -2012. Another interesting thing here is that the profits in 2012 is higher than that in 2009. That implies Elliott's 1st rule that second waves can never fall below the start of first waves. As can be seen from the price chart, blue wave 2 never fell below the start of blue wave 1. From 2012 to presently in 2018 the share price of Safcom has risen dramatically. The profits have risen in tandem with the share price. From the evidence, it is important to also notice that the share price rose/fell first before the profits increased/decreased. This means that you can/should use the share price to predict the direction of the profits. Those who call themselves fundamental analysts do the opposite - like what they are doing right now, trying to figure out from the financials where the price of safcom share should go next. This approach (fundamental analysis) is defeatist. Learn Elliott, apply the rules rigorously (they are only three rules) and see yourself succeed at forecasting much better than even university professors in economics. Conventional thinkers waste time building shelters when they are unnecessary and then have no shelters when they need them the most. Socionomists do the opposite.
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 1/20/2011 Posts: 1,820 Location: Nakuru
|
Pesa Nane wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:@pesa 8, you sold grudgingly at 15, we saved your skin boss!!! Idiot is right back @6.60 Kobole(corner saba) has printed Dumb money becomes dumb only when it listens to smart money
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/7/2012 Posts: 11,908
|
sparkly wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:Pesa Nane wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:@pesa 8, you sold grudgingly at 15, we saved your skin boss!!! Idiot is right back @6.60 Almost got back jana @+7 lakini I asked & was warned not to try. Let me wait kidogo. Tempted!!! Technically insolvent. Anyone buying should be ready for further dilution by debt conversions and new share issues. 5.85 Prints, i escaped 2nd massacre In the business world, everyone is paid in two coins - cash and experience. Take the experience first; the cash will come later - H Geneen
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/11/2012 Posts: 5,222
|
mnandii wrote:THE POWER OF ELLIOTT WAVES AND SOCIONOMICS
If you study carefully the two charts/images and especially between the years 2007 - 2012 you'll come to appreciate the unique qualities of Elliott Waves and Socionomics. But that is only if you don't get blinded by the economics literature you have studied and come to accept as default. Also, your primitive brain (this is a scientific word, sio matusi) aka basal ganglia can blind you from seeing and accepting this evidence of superiority of Elliott. So, this is how it goes: Btw 2007 -2009, the Safcom price chart shows the stock price was falling in value. The same thing(falling profits) is shown in the Profits chart (it is subtle and you may need to look closely). Btw 2009 - 2010 the stock price rose in value to about 6/=. The same goes for profits which shows a bump in 2010. Btw 2010 -2012 again Safcom price fell in price to about 3/=. The profits mirrored this by falling in value btw 2010 -2012. Another interesting thing here is that the profits in 2012 is higher than that in 2009. That implies Elliott's 1st rule that second waves can never fall below the start of first waves. As can be seen from the price chart, blue wave 2 never fell below the start of blue wave 1. From 2012 to presently in 2018 the share price of Safcom has risen dramatically. The profits have risen in tandem with the share price. From the evidence, it is important to also notice that the share price rose/fell first before the profits increased/decreased. This means that you can/should use the share price to predict the direction of the profits. Those who call themselves fundamental analysts do the opposite - like what they are doing right now, trying to figure out from the financials where the price of safcom share should go next. This approach (fundamental analysis) is defeatist. Learn Elliott, apply the rules rigorously (they are only three rules) and see yourself succeed at forecasting much better than even university professors in economics. What you call Socioeconomics in essence is, the fundamental analysis. They are mutually exclusive. If a company's fundamentals flop, it doesn't really matter what TA you come up with, it could be just one marubozu, and case closed. That, and sometimes TA is not picture perfect. When applying it historically, one can force it, however real-time, you need fundies. Fib can give target points, but a break-out is in essence governed by FA
|
|
Rank: Chief Joined: 1/3/2007 Posts: 18,118 Location: Nairobi
|
mnandii wrote:THE POWER OF ELLIOTT WAVES AND SOCIONOMICS
If you study carefully the two charts/images and especially between the years 2007 - 2012 you'll come to appreciate the unique qualities of Elliott Waves and Socionomics. But that is only if you don't get blinded by the economics literature you have studied and come to accept as default. Also, your primitive brain (this is a scientific word, sio matusi) aka basal ganglia can blind you from seeing and accepting this evidence of superiority of Elliott. So, this is how it goes: Btw 2007 -2009, the Safcom price chart shows the stock price was falling in value. The same thing(falling profits) is shown in the Profits chart (it is subtle and you may need to look closely). Btw 2009 - 2010 the stock price rose in value to about 6/=. The same goes for profits which shows a bump in 2010. Btw 2010 -2012 again Safcom price fell in price to about 3/=. The profits mirrored this by falling in value btw 2010 -2012. Another interesting thing here is that the profits in 2012 is higher than that in 2009. That implies Elliott's 1st rule that second waves can never fall below the start of first waves. As can be seen from the price chart, blue wave 2 never fell below the start of blue wave 1. From 2012 to presently in 2018 the share price of Safcom has risen dramatically. The profits have risen in tandem with the share price. From the evidence, it is important to also notice that the share price rose/fell first before the profits increased/decreased. This means that you can/should use the share price to predict the direction of the profits. Those who call themselves fundamental analysts do the opposite - like what they are doing right now, trying to figure out from the financials where the price of safcom share should go next. This approach (fundamental analysis) is defeatist. Learn Elliott, apply the rules rigorously (they are only three rules) and see yourself succeed at forecasting much better than even university professors in economics. All done after the fact. WB doesn't believe in Charts but fundamentals including good governance. Which chartist comes close to WB? Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/11/2012 Posts: 5,222
|
VituVingiSana wrote:mnandii wrote:THE POWER OF ELLIOTT WAVES AND SOCIONOMICS
If you study carefully the two charts/images and especially between the years 2007 - 2012 you'll come to appreciate the unique qualities of Elliott Waves and Socionomics. But that is only if you don't get blinded by the economics literature you have studied and come to accept as default. Also, your primitive brain (this is a scientific word, sio matusi) aka basal ganglia can blind you from seeing and accepting this evidence of superiority of Elliott. So, this is how it goes: Btw 2007 -2009, the Safcom price chart shows the stock price was falling in value. The same thing(falling profits) is shown in the Profits chart (it is subtle and you may need to look closely). Btw 2009 - 2010 the stock price rose in value to about 6/=. The same goes for profits which shows a bump in 2010. Btw 2010 -2012 again Safcom price fell in price to about 3/=. The profits mirrored this by falling in value btw 2010 -2012. Another interesting thing here is that the profits in 2012 is higher than that in 2009. That implies Elliott's 1st rule that second waves can never fall below the start of first waves. As can be seen from the price chart, blue wave 2 never fell below the start of blue wave 1. From 2012 to presently in 2018 the share price of Safcom has risen dramatically. The profits have risen in tandem with the share price. From the evidence, it is important to also notice that the share price rose/fell first before the profits increased/decreased. This means that you can/should use the share price to predict the direction of the profits. Those who call themselves fundamental analysts do the opposite - like what they are doing right now, trying to figure out from the financials where the price of safcom share should go next. This approach (fundamental analysis) is defeatist. Learn Elliott, apply the rules rigorously (they are only three rules) and see yourself succeed at forecasting much better than even university professors in economics. All done after the fact. WB doesn't believe in Charts but fundamentals including good governance. Which chartist comes close to WB? Soros. Buffet is all about accumulating and never spending. Living frugal like a miser. What is money (and the process of building wealth) if you can't have a little fun?
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/11/2006 Posts: 2,304
|
VituVingiSana wrote:mnandii wrote:THE POWER OF ELLIOTT WAVES AND SOCIONOMICS
If you study carefully the two charts/images and especially between the years 2007 - 2012 you'll come to appreciate the unique qualities of Elliott Waves and Socionomics. But that is only if you don't get blinded by the economics literature you have studied and come to accept as default. Also, your primitive brain (this is a scientific word, sio matusi) aka basal ganglia can blind you from seeing and accepting this evidence of superiority of Elliott. So, this is how it goes: Btw 2007 -2009, the Safcom price chart shows the stock price was falling in value. The same thing(falling profits) is shown in the Profits chart (it is subtle and you may need to look closely). Btw 2009 - 2010 the stock price rose in value to about 6/=. The same goes for profits which shows a bump in 2010. Btw 2010 -2012 again Safcom price fell in price to about 3/=. The profits mirrored this by falling in value btw 2010 -2012. Another interesting thing here is that the profits in 2012 is higher than that in 2009. That implies Elliott's 1st rule that second waves can never fall below the start of first waves. As can be seen from the price chart, blue wave 2 never fell below the start of blue wave 1. From 2012 to presently in 2018 the share price of Safcom has risen dramatically. The profits have risen in tandem with the share price. From the evidence, it is important to also notice that the share price rose/fell first before the profits increased/decreased. This means that you can/should use the share price to predict the direction of the profits. Those who call themselves fundamental analysts do the opposite - like what they are doing right now, trying to figure out from the financials where the price of safcom share should go next. This approach (fundamental analysis) is defeatist. Learn Elliott, apply the rules rigorously (they are only three rules) and see yourself succeed at forecasting much better than even university professors in economics. All done after the fact. WB doesn't believe in Charts but fundamentals including good governance. Which chartist comes close to WB? I have not changed any data in the charts. Do check yourself. Conventional thinkers waste time building shelters when they are unnecessary and then have no shelters when they need them the most. Socionomists do the opposite.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/11/2006 Posts: 2,304
|
Unfortunately the fundamentalists who are trying argue their case now conveniently avoid the facts as availed in the charts. Why? The question is simple , do you see any correlation btw the price chart and the performance of the company. If a fundamentalist can answer this clearly without any unnecessary details then thumbs up to you. Conventional thinkers waste time building shelters when they are unnecessary and then have no shelters when they need them the most. Socionomists do the opposite.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/11/2006 Posts: 2,304
|
mnandii wrote:VituVingiSana wrote:mnandii wrote:THE POWER OF ELLIOTT WAVES AND SOCIONOMICS
If you study carefully the two charts/images and especially between the years 2007 - 2012 you'll come to appreciate the unique qualities of Elliott Waves and Socionomics. But that is only if you don't get blinded by the economics literature you have studied and come to accept as default. Also, your primitive brain (this is a scientific word, sio matusi) aka basal ganglia can blind you from seeing and accepting this evidence of superiority of Elliott. So, this is how it goes: Btw 2007 -2009, the Safcom price chart shows the stock price was falling in value. The same thing(falling profits) is shown in the Profits chart (it is subtle and you may need to look closely). Btw 2009 - 2010 the stock price rose in value to about 6/=. The same goes for profits which shows a bump in 2010. Btw 2010 -2012 again Safcom price fell in price to about 3/=. The profits mirrored this by falling in value btw 2010 -2012. Another interesting thing here is that the profits in 2012 is higher than that in 2009. That implies Elliott's 1st rule that second waves can never fall below the start of first waves. As can be seen from the price chart, blue wave 2 never fell below the start of blue wave 1. From 2012 to presently in 2018 the share price of Safcom has risen dramatically. The profits have risen in tandem with the share price. From the evidence, it is important to also notice that the share price rose/fell first before the profits increased/decreased. This means that you can/should use the share price to predict the direction of the profits. Those who call themselves fundamental analysts do the opposite - like what they are doing right now, trying to figure out from the financials where the price of safcom share should go next. This approach (fundamental analysis) is defeatist. Learn Elliott, apply the rules rigorously (they are only three rules) and see yourself succeed at forecasting much better than even university professors in economics. WB doesn't believe in Charts but fundamentals including good governance. Which chartist comes close to WB? I have not changed any data in the charts. Do check yourself. They are not noisy but busy doing more meaningful research. Conventional thinkers waste time building shelters when they are unnecessary and then have no shelters when they need them the most. Socionomists do the opposite.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/11/2006 Posts: 2,304
|
Quote: What you call Socioeconomics in essence is, the fundamental analysis. They are mutually exclusive. If a company's fundamentals flop, it doesn't really matter what TA you come up with, it could be just one marubozu, and case closed. That, and sometimes TA is not picture perfect. When applying it historically, one can force it, however real-time, you need fundies. Fib can give target points, but a break-out is in essence governed by FA
You could do well to point any data that has been forced as you claim. Please note that the data I use I did not generate. Both the price chart and the profit figures are publicly available data. What I have done is to put them in context - which is what Elliott is all about. Conventional thinkers waste time building shelters when they are unnecessary and then have no shelters when they need them the most. Socionomists do the opposite.
|
|
Rank: Chief Joined: 1/3/2007 Posts: 18,118 Location: Nairobi
|
mnandii wrote:Unfortunately the fundamentalists who are trying argue their case now conveniently avoid the facts as availed in the charts. Why? The question is simple , do you see any correlation btw the price chart and the performance of the company. If a fundamentalist can answer this clearly without any unnecessary details then thumbs up to you. In the longer term, ceteris paribus, the share price follows profits/performance. These short term variations mean little. Anyway, different strokes... Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
|
|
Wazua
»
Investor
»
Stocks
»
Elliott Wave Analysis Of The NSE 20
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|