mkonomtupu wrote:Quote:So the liabilities should be ignored?
Would a buyer (buying at 18.2bn) just get the assets & not the liabilities?
If one can get the assets, as described above, without the liabilities then I am sure local investors would happily pay 18.2bn for 150bn in net assets.
What happens to the liabilities?
What is the Net Asset Value of KenGen?
The major component of liabilities is 73b borrowings at low interest and mostly backed by GoK guarantee. would a private investor take over the sovereign debt and would the lenders even agree. GoK will continue to have a controlling majority in kengen for a longtime.
On the NAV- i have not calculated because it's not a useful tool for a company like kengen i prefer to look at dividend yield and the risk factors-liquidity, market and credit
Well, a firm like GE or a Berkshire Entity taking on responsibility for the loans would be a better bet for lenders than GoK as a guarantor.
GE's pricing on its Jan 2015 loans is 50% of GoK's Sovereign Bond.
http://www.forbes.com/si...ffeirng-in-three-parts/
Berkshire Hathaway may even command lower rates than GE.
Ownership of KenGen is more of a political issue.
You have a point. It doesn't matter what the NAV is. What matters is the CASHFLOW. Not profits boosted by Tax Credits but CASH FLOW. And even more important, as you stated, CASH that is paid out as a dividend.
What's KenGen's dividend?
What's the dividend yield?
Can KenGen consistently grow its dividend?
What's the net (post-tax) return from KenGen's dividend vs the interest on a (Tax-free) KenGen Bond or Infrastructure Bond?
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett