sparkly wrote:VituVingiSana wrote:sparkly wrote:VituVingiSana wrote:sparkly wrote:Realtreaty wrote:Things are opening up. When a new partner chips in it means money have been brought and big minds in the system. Soon we shall see bigger things!!!
Very unfair to current shareholders when a new monied shareholder comes in and buys shares at less than the NAV. They are diluted without an opt out.
If you feel britam is undervalued then run out and buy more from those who are selling. I did that with KK.
Issue is not undervaluation and buying more. Issue is when you hold undervalued share waiting to rise then the company issues new shares effectively diluting you without option to avoid dilution.
IFC paid 50% more than the "market price" [plus there may be other skeletons which we do not know of. Look at KQ which was sold at a "discount" to market price or NAV but then the skeletons emerged]... The problem arises if you have no more cash on hand to buy more shares at below 15/-.
Yes, lack of cash to buy more is the problem below NAV is the problem.
Then you should have said so instead of trying to blame the "monied shareholder" who paid a huge (50%) premium to the Market Price. What's the NAV of Britam?
Plus why would significant (& wealthy) shareholders like Wairegi, Mwangi, Mbaru, Munga, et al agree to a sale below (published) NAV unless they know something we do not.
Based on the above, I am NOT buying Britam shares until I see the 2016 results and the terms of the IFC purchase. Good luck.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett