selah wrote:In 2011 KK changed its accounting policy of asset reporting they are now using historical figures....I think this dropped its asset book by about 1B plus in in Dec 2011....Now the losses from the hedging position were anticipated by the close of yr....this means H1 results had to be impacted by the change in a accounting policy as well as the hedging position taken last year.
The question is can KK reverse the losses in their hedging positions....This will depend with how this positions are valued....I am not a derivative guru so I wont pretend to know how its done but one thing for sure reversing a 4B hole will be a fit.
The hole cannot be filled in 2H which means FY 2012 will show a loss less than 4bn but a large loss.
The question is... does Puma care about 'history'? The answer is no.
Puma is buying a business they understand & will probably knock off KES 1-3 off the original offer. Puma was aware of some of the hedging losses (as disclosed in the Annual Report) as of 31st Dec 2011. I am sure they knew more than we did when the initial announcement was made. The sellers are no fools either. Yes, they want to exit for political reasons coz a new gov't may not be as accommodating but not at a huge loss.
Finally, the management has an ESOP & the CEO has many options. Every KES counts!
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett