Let's say that; asking you to explain your response to Joey and Mariga in terms of your 'doctrine' to people who have difficulty in understanding both your sentiments and doctrine is a 'penny mbili' question.

Then, that would mean the MEAT can't be about what you say or have said here or on any other thread.

You are simply disconnected from your 'doctrine'.

Anyway, go learn how to use your mind, and then I may show you how this 'doctrine' I have assumed to be correct so far, is not just incorrect but not different in quality from any other 'doctrine' out there.

And hence your sense of moral superiority is just silliness wearing smilies.

But what does describing the world as it is, have to do with doctrine? .
If I walk outside and see a man killing another woman for her money and describe it, how does that invalidate TULIP or the 5 Solas?
Clearly someone might be off his meds for the day!

Well, if your doctrine has nothing to do with explaining things as they are then, that's a stupid doctrine because it has no value!

Nice to know that we have a scrap of your meat.

Needless to say that this response is contradictory to your assertion that doctrine has nothing to do with describing the world as it is .

Now that we agree that doctrine has something to do with describing the world as it is, the part highlighted is hopelessly vague with relation to your TULIP. I wonder if you can see how? Fakeman, can you?

But did you forget to add the 5 Solas that are EXTREMELY CLEAR in addressing the same?
A little knowledge (and being off meds) is a dangerous thing!