Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Culture
»
Redefining Family
Rank: Member Joined: 9/30/2013 Posts: 659
|
Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes. And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. If you stay ready, no need to get ready.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/27/2007 Posts: 2,768
|
Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. A cow will always be a cow no matter the viewing angle!!!! ...besides, the presence of a safe alone does not signify that there is money inside...
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. The family isn't being redefined, it has already redefined itself, and it's redefining itself at a very rapid rate. Our educators and dictionaries may even be lagging behind. In fact they are lagging behind.
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
tycho wrote:Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. The family isn't being redefined, it has already redefined itself, and it's redefining itself at a very rapid rate. Our educators and dictionaries may even be lagging behind. In fact they are lagging behind. What is the up-to-date definition?
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 4/22/2010 Posts: 11,522 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. The family isn't being redefined, it has already redefined itself, and it's redefining itself at a very rapid rate. Our educators and dictionaries may even be lagging behind. In fact they are lagging behind. What is the up-to-date definition? Am sure it incorporates akina Adam and Steve.... possunt quia posse videntur
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. The family isn't being redefined, it has already redefined itself, and it's redefining itself at a very rapid rate. Our educators and dictionaries may even be lagging behind. In fact they are lagging behind. What is the up-to-date definition? I'm looking at a time when the family doesn't exist, hence not there to be defined.
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. The family isn't being redefined, it has already redefined itself, and it's redefining itself at a very rapid rate. Our educators and dictionaries may even be lagging behind. In fact they are lagging behind. What is the up-to-date definition? I'm looking at a time when the family doesn't exist, hence not there to be defined. No sir, You have said it has already redefined itself at a rapid rate. So its still there. Or are you thinking of future?
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
maka wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. The family isn't being redefined, it has already redefined itself, and it's redefining itself at a very rapid rate. Our educators and dictionaries may even be lagging behind. In fact they are lagging behind. What is the up-to-date definition? Am sure it incorporates akina Adam and Steve.... Most likely. They have been getting traction recently. But Pedes has given us broken news. What are the curriculum developers thinking of?
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. The family isn't being redefined, it has already redefined itself, and it's redefining itself at a very rapid rate. Our educators and dictionaries may even be lagging behind. In fact they are lagging behind. What is the up-to-date definition? I'm looking at a time when the family doesn't exist, hence not there to be defined. No sir, You have said it has already redefined itself at a rapid rate. So its still there. Or are you thinking of future? I'm talking about now. No one has control of definition any more. But maybe some will see this 'in the future'.
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 11/15/2012 Posts: 1,110
|
Is education dynamic? If the society is dynamic, so should be the education system. Live Full Die Empty - Les Brown.
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 9/30/2013 Posts: 659
|
Muriel wrote:maka wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. The family isn't being redefined, it has already redefined itself, and it's redefining itself at a very rapid rate. Our educators and dictionaries may even be lagging behind. In fact they are lagging behind. What is the up-to-date definition? Am sure it incorporates akina Adam and Steve.... Most likely. They have been getting traction recently. But Pedes has given us broken news. What are the curriculum developers thinking of? Kids from single parent families are wondering why are the pictures in the textbooks have mom and dad and watoto. If theirs has one parent missing then is it not a family? Others are asking if nanny/maid etc are to be included cause they refer to the as aunty. So for the purpose of them they want to have pictures/illustration of single parenthood as a family. If you stay ready, no need to get ready.
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 2/9/2012 Posts: 576
|
Kaigangio wrote:Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. A cow will always be a cow no matter the viewing angle!!!! "How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg." - Abraham Lincoln Africa belongs to Africans.
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
Pedes wrote:Muriel wrote:maka wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. The family isn't being redefined, it has already redefined itself, and it's redefining itself at a very rapid rate. Our educators and dictionaries may even be lagging behind. In fact they are lagging behind. What is the up-to-date definition? Am sure it incorporates akina Adam and Steve.... Most likely. They have been getting traction recently. But Pedes has given us broken news. What are the curriculum developers thinking of? Kids from single parent families are wondering why are the pictures in the textbooks have mom and dad and watoto. If theirs has one parent missing then is it not a family? Others are asking if nanny/maid etc are to be included cause they refer to the as aunty. So for the purpose of them they want to have pictures/illustration of single parenthood as a family. Hiyo yao si ni 'single parent family'. Shida ya definition iko wapi sasa? Kama ni picha tu waongezwe haraka before akina Steve hijack hii maneno.
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/9/2007 Posts: 420 Location: Nairobi
|
wazuaguest wrote:Kaigangio wrote:Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. A cow will always be a cow no matter the viewing angle!!!! "How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg." - Abraham Lincoln Lets be sensitive...i believe the carriculum developers have the young minds at heart Opinion is free, truth is sacred.
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. The family isn't being redefined, it has already redefined itself, and it's redefining itself at a very rapid rate. Our educators and dictionaries may even be lagging behind. In fact they are lagging behind. What is the up-to-date definition? I'm looking at a time when the family doesn't exist, hence not there to be defined. No sir, You have said it has already redefined itself at a rapid rate. So its still there. Or are you thinking of future? I'm talking about now. No one has control of definition any more. But maybe some will see this 'in the future'. Ok, though it is still being controlled. What about the future? Is there a future?
|
|
Rank: New-farer Joined: 8/26/2013 Posts: 29
|
wazuaguest wrote:Kaigangio wrote:Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. A cow will always be a cow no matter the viewing angle!!!! "How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg." - Abraham Lincoln Paraphrased from the Bible nothing that is happening here on God's earth is new. Whatever you see or hear now has happened before. After all the hoopla the original definition of the family will stay as it is . My 40cts
Life's for the living
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. The family isn't being redefined, it has already redefined itself, and it's redefining itself at a very rapid rate. Our educators and dictionaries may even be lagging behind. In fact they are lagging behind. What is the up-to-date definition? I'm looking at a time when the family doesn't exist, hence not there to be defined. No sir, You have said it has already redefined itself at a rapid rate. So its still there. Or are you thinking of future? I'm talking about now. No one has control of definition any more. But maybe some will see this 'in the future'. Ok, though it is still being controlled. What about the future? Is there a future? 'Future' depends on 'self consciousness'. It's being created by the kind of dialogue we're having. But so far, no one is controlling the definition, most are trying to, but the results are a failure. With DOMA (defense of marriage act) gone, the gates have been thrown wide open. The puzzle is how humanity will handle the conversation.
|
|
Rank: Chief Joined: 5/9/2007 Posts: 13,095
|
I thought we used to study types of families? Ama?
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
mb'oss wrote:wazuaguest wrote:Kaigangio wrote:Pedes wrote:Some curriculum developers are advocating for redefinition of what a family is for the sake of the young kids from single parent homes.
And elsewhere the Oxford dictionary is contemplating redefining marriage. A cow will always be a cow no matter the viewing angle!!!! "How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg." - Abraham Lincoln Paraphrased from the Bible nothing that is happening here on God's earth is new. Whatever you see or hear now has happened before. After all the hoopla the original definition of the family will stay as it is . My 40cts While humanity progresses on the basis of what came before, our ancestors, symbols and our interpretations are bound to change, and they've always changed. Like now, the economic experience in the family is changing. So are roles and expectations. But it's still about being human. We can also be sure the solutions will have to come from the past. Like Plato and Socrates, even Pythagoras may be brought back to life for advice; if it hasn't happened already.
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 5/11/2010 Posts: 918
|
washiku wrote:I thought we used to study types of families? Ama? Yeah, but only nuclear and extended according to my recollection. Your link has more - which is good. In the end all these things - even Adam and Steve, I dare say, will be fully integrated into society. It is a matter of when, not if. It's okay to resist it, that's completely human. But it is necessary to know that one day, one freaking day, all these things we are abhorring now will be as normal as the sun rising from the east. Learn first to treat your time as you would your money, then treat your money as you do your time.
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Culture
»
Redefining Family
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|