wazua Fri, May 15, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

2 Pages12>
Church surrenders to State
tycho
#1 Posted : Monday, July 23, 2012 9:23:19 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
I have just come from watching a well respected Bishop saying that the State should help in regulating churches.

Church Kaput.

And most unfortunately, the state is also dead.

What next?
murchr
#2 Posted : Monday, July 23, 2012 9:28:23 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 2/26/2012
Posts: 15,980
I support the Bishop...we cant continue watching this circus. Its time some action is taken lest we become like Nigeria
"There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore
.
Coolbull
#3 Posted : Tuesday, July 24, 2012 8:03:53 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 10/23/2007
Posts: 604
@tycho ...that's how the New World Order will come in - in the name of taming rogue churches. Which church on earth does not cajole for collections?

In Kibera thieves use knives and ngeta. In upmarket areas the pen is enough. In like manner in low-end churches wizi ni open but in the mainstream churches it's done so professionally.

In the book of Acts 2, we see that in the early church people would sell their possessions and bring the proceeds to the church and sharing was done equally. "No one lacked".

No one did what? No one lacked.
YesuWangu
#4 Posted : Tuesday, July 24, 2012 8:17:52 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 8/11/2010
Posts: 1,588

Whenever the church and state unite, it is the church that has the upper hand and will lord it over the state. Because politicians are elected every so years and will depend on the clergy to help in their re-election.

This is a very bad idea.
Mwendia
#5 Posted : Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:23:46 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 6/18/2008
Posts: 28
I think the govt should start taxing these churches that is the best way to weed out these criminal pastors. The corporate taxes for the church should be 45% of the gross income. I am sure they can pay this becasue they can afford some to live in posh homes advertising on the television etc etc
Dia
#6 Posted : Tuesday, July 24, 2012 1:39:42 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 3/30/2010
Posts: 176
As the bishop said, it is difficult to legislate matters spiritual. Coming up with a criteria for the different groups(witchdoctors, muslim clergy,legio maria, wakorino) will be an unnecessary headache.

tycho
#7 Posted : Tuesday, July 24, 2012 3:39:40 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Coolbull wrote:
@tycho ...that's how the New World Order will come in - in the name of taming rogue churches. Which church on earth does not cajole for collections?

In Kibera thieves use knives and ngeta. In upmarket areas the pen is enough. In like manner in low-end churches wizi ni open but in the mainstream churches it's done so professionally.

In the book of Acts 2, we see that in the early church people would sell their possessions and bring the proceeds to the church and sharing was done equally. "No one lacked".

No one did what? No one lacked.

@coolbull
'In the name of taming rogue churches . . .' How can we have 'rogue churches?' Certainly, these words should not be! But they are. What can be done? Who is the actor?

Can a world order be established without your word? And what would the establishment of a world order without your word mean to you?
tycho
#8 Posted : Tuesday, July 24, 2012 4:11:20 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
YesuWangu wrote:

Whenever the church and state unite, it is the church that has the upper hand and will lord it over the state. Because politicians are elected every so years and will depend on the clergy to help in their re-election.

This is a very bad idea.


When Constantine took the sign of the cross, the Church grew powerful. But now, the cross is effete. It seems it cannot even chase a baby vampire away!

Or is it that Constantin's entry dealt the fatal blow?

How could it be, that the Church fathers could not settle the question of orthodoxy once and for all?

What did Luther really want? Could he rightly say, 'Sola sriptura?' For example, by letting everyone read the bible for himself, he was letting everyone interpret the bible for himself . . . but scripture is Canon, and Canon? Conversation. Luther only magnified Christianity's errors.

How could it be that Arius' case could only be settled by death?

Perhaps there was never meant to be a canon at all! Could it be that Christ never intended to have a religion at all?

Maybe Luther was anti-religious himself . . . or at least, ideologically, he was to sow the seeds of 'irreligion' and now we are left to gather the harvest?

Who are we?

Supposing the Church has in fact been rotting from within since Constantine, does it mean that Nietzsche was right with his 'The last Christan died on the cross?'

What did Christ say?
YesuWangu
#9 Posted : Wednesday, July 25, 2012 8:30:27 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 8/11/2010
Posts: 1,588
tycho wrote:


When Constantine took the sign of the cross, the Church grew powerful. ..........



That is what I am saying. A lot happened in the union between crowns and the church since Constantine. E.g. Clovis did exploits for the church in France, fought wars for God and exterminated peoples and deposed kings. But because of these centuries-long horrors of the dark ages, nations being newly established after that period expressly prohibited the union of church and state. The prime example is USA with its first amendment of the constitution.

Of course currently it appears that the cross has been extinguished, effete (lol) but then again, the Hegelian principle at work. Like in a pendulum, to create a 'christian' condition in the society, allow / make the liberals to do their thing unhindered (amorality / immorality) and the moderates who make the majority will soon be fed up and demand tough action against it. Of course it goes without saying that the church will naturally spear head this and the politician who can deliver this will get the votes.

So, as you can see from our society and the world over, the liberals are having their say and they are saying it LOUD, soon the church will have its way. This fatal blow, this rotting from within, will be healed. The liberals, in thought and action who want to think and act independently will go and that includes even those ones who still follow Luthers ideals.

BTW, lol at 'It seems it cannot even chase a baby vampire away!'...... funny man you are! Laughing out loudly

tnesh
#10 Posted : Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:47:03 PM
Rank: New-farer

Joined: 7/9/2012
Posts: 17
tycho wrote:
[quote=YesuWangu]
....Could it be that Christ never intended to have a religion at all?....


In the defn of religion we find that religion is the belief and worship of a supreme being, a further explanation is that religion is a SYSTEM of worshiping a supreme being.

Jesus is the author of all Christianity but the Catholic Church is responsible for starting a system for the Christians (Post-bible).

The Catholic church formed when the Roman state (Government) integrated with the Christian church. (What a genius political move to conquer the world)

Follow history and realize that almost all churches (protestant) are fragments of systems that broke from the mother Catholic church due to dissent.

The siasa that is in the “Christian”(please note the quotes) religion is immense, and unfortunately these has smeared the reputation of Christianity (please note NO quotes).

Realize that other religions have also been used politically. Islam is passed as law in many countries. Continents have been colonized by the power of religion.

Basically religion is the most powerful way to control a people.
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.