Where in Hell is Guka today?
Who knows which room in MMH he was checked in last evening?

Sources close to the closest family members claims that he had terrible trouble landing last evening!

Wendz, by switcing those 2 statements, it means that the proposed constitution has not expressly stated that one is not allowed to marry a person of the same sex. Believe me, a few years down the line, there will be a case in court arguing that gay marriage is constitutional (and how right they will be) KURA LAKINI BADO NI YES!

nimegundua talking to a YES person about the flaws of the document ni kupigia mbuzi guitar. just hope you know the future you are curving for your country.
just because the draft gives you the right to do something e.g. use the office of the public defender - does not mean that you can't hire your own lawyer or represent yourself.
simply put its a RIGHT, it does not OUTLAW self representation or Representation by private attorney. that right there is my point.

masukuma, most guys on wazua realised that talking to NO guys about the pros of the proposed constitution ni kama kupigia paka nyatindi. So we don't even bother.

Ngai!!.....Kwani Musukuma aliguza chui thutha?

@Masukuma,

Not to worry. The winner of that rumble is in RED gloves

But the same colonial guys have now legalize it in their backyard...what a twist!

The right has been given but the constitution does not force anyone to exercise that right, however, denying a person that right violates the constitution, kindly note therefore that not exercising the said right has not been explicitly outlawed.... not exercising that right takes the forms of celibacy, transgender marriage, intersex marriage, polygamy/polyandry, etc.... in most African cultures barren women have been marrying fellow women.... it is Abrahamic religions that have a different view

How things change... While I started this thread and I don't agree with the guy who started it!

A lawyer friend was explaining to me that this court case is too much noise over nothing.

Apparently, the words "sex against the order of nature" would include oral sex as well.

Secondly, it's a crime almost impossible to prove in court. There was a judge who had ordered suspects to be medically examined to determine whether they had engaged in gay sex.

It's the same judge who had acquitted a guy who had defiled a 13-year old because, she seemed to have enjoyed the sex.

Both his outrageous rulings were overturned by the appeal court.