Are the issues at hand real and factual?

If yes then let the law take its course.

Above all if it happens,we shall have restored the dignity of the Capital City of Kenya.We shall get rid of the drug thug as a governor.

It was front page news on Monday, May 18,1998. The East African Standard copy is circulating huko twitter. Sema jamaa kulimwo

Sonko should stop listening to Drake "City is mine". It doesn't work that way kwa ground

Unfortunately, he quietly handled no issue! When I visited Nairobi I could see all the potholes in Estate roads, including Westlands Church road where my business of interest is located, and the residents continuously complained of water problems. But lately, when I'm there, the tanks are full of water, courtesy of Sonko.

NB: I do not support Sonko as a leader!

Again I am not proposing the creation of a new capital. I am proposing the decongestion of the city by moving government operations out of the city and incentivizing the private sector to relocate their operations out of the city.

I have 3 observations on Abuja

1. The Naija government was not aggressive enough. In fact many government agencies are still located in Lagos
2. They did not incentive the private sector to leave Lagos
3. The Abuja government has been discouraging mass migration to Abuja in order to maintain the City's pristine condition. In fact there has been massive demolition of informal settlements and evictions from the city.

Moving malls and services out of the city is not gonna cut it. Last I checked, the City is still chocking in endless traffic, water shortages, lack of sanitation, incessant flooding, inadequate housing, lack of open spaces......

All these are getting worse. So what problem have we solved?


I am not even sure what you are saying here. Relocating jobs means relocating people. Which means fewer people live in the city and its environs.


Clearly we havent.

In 1985, 5% of Kenyans lived in Nairobi. Today 10% of Kenyans live in Nairobi. The proportion of Kenyans living in Nairobi has doubled which means most people want to migrate to the city. Other towns are not much of an option

Compare this with New York for example. In 1985, New York had 3.2 % of the population of the USA. Today that proportion has reduced to 2.5%. Thats means they are doing a good job of promoting other cities.



I don't know if this is a serious question.
In any case if we want the country to progress then why should we compare ourselves with Uganda which is another sheet-hole?
This is like a parent reading their child's report form when the child was number 49 out of 50 and the parent responds by saying "At least you are not last"