Rank: User Joined: 8/15/2013 Posts: 13,237 Location: Vacuum
|
2012 wrote:Swenani wrote:2012 wrote:Swenani wrote:AlphDoti wrote:Traditionally (read earlier in the times) men were expected to provide for the women... and largely these men did their job. That ideally meant the women did not need to worry about their welfare and maintenance. But! Today the boychild is sleeping on the job, he is no longer striving to be the provider. So what should the girl child do, sit there and starve? She is now working harder... so be it, let her earn more proportionate to the effort she is putting in. Whether a woman earns more or not. A MAN should provide for his family. I'm sure you mean a man should provide direction and vision as the head? Surely, we cannot go hungry when times are tough and you have a load saved up. Man up chief. Depending on a woman month in month out is mannerless moreso for an african man. Only touch a woman's money when you have an emergency and not MONTHLY emergenciesI also think we should balance out expenses, of course the man should always take up the rent. Man should pay rent/buy hse, cater for your ladies(wife+daughters+MK) saloon and other expenses, buy food, shopping, pay fees and fuel the car for her.You shouldn't even check what she earnsWhat do you think, who should foot what supposing we're earning the same and you want your marriage to last? She should only foot for her househelp salary, kitchenwares(na mathogothanio ingine yote ya kurembesha nyumba)extended relatives expenses,family gifts and her drinks when she goes out with the ladies For peace of your mind, don't touch a woman's money especially taking her money do for use on capital expenditure. So, let's say I provide for everything, yaani 100% provision, will you still ask me where it's coming from or why I'm late or where I've been? Or will you woman up as well like the African woman? (as quoted above). She should woman up too and stop asking the man of the house petty questions If Obiero did it, Who Am I?
|