MugundaMan wrote:rwitre wrote:MugundaMan wrote:Neveready was
less than 2% of my modest assets and the
only asset in the casino (NSE). Thanks on the wishes on the mugundas. I have never met a mugunda that has not paid me handsomely over time!
Apples to oranges. Yes, land will preserve wealth and gradually grow it. It's a solid investment.
Stocks carry more risk,
but rate of capital appreciation is higher. i.e., it's easier to make >100% gains through stocks over time than real estate. But you can also lose everything.
If I want to turn $1000 into $100,000, best believe I'll go into stock trading, instead of buying a plot and waiting for a decade for the land prices to increase.
"If the shoe fits, wear it"
Big fallacy my broda. Show us how you made a 100% return on your overall portfolio in one year and then we can talk. And please do not tell us you invested 10k on a penny stock and made 20k after 5 years and are very happy about it.
Look at it in terms of probability. Ranked with increasing levels of risk:
1. Land: Safe haven. Everyone invested in real estate sees value gains. Politicians, civil servants, kings, paupers, hard-workers and those waiting to inherit from them- as long as your claim to the land is valid, gains are certain.
2. Unit trusts, MMF, T-Bills and Bonds- Sit pretty and wait for the interest cheques to roll in. Steady and predictable growth, unless the government screws the economy.
3. Stocks: Riskier. But if you pick a valuable firm, that meets shareholder needs and consumer demands at the same time- and increase your stake significantly, you get higher gains. cc. long-term gains like for those who got into Safaricom at Sh 2. or fast
ones like the famous Black Wednesday where a brave bet by George soros made $1 billion usd in short selling. Or you could pick a monkey and see if it will jump like Orchards did, and hope it doesn't trap your capital like ARM.
4. Crypto: Requires more nerves of steel. However, has made more common folk millionaires in the past half-decade compared to all the rest. Conversely, it has also made multiple more bankrupt.
5. Gambling: (casinos to sport betting) Chances are very low. Can make you broke very fast, but when you get the right combination, you hit the jackpot, like
one Cosmas Korir who no has to share 42 million from his winnings with GoK as taxes6. The lottery: You have a better chance of being hit by lightning than winning the lottery- like the Powerball, where odds are 1 in 292,201,338. But tell that to the
42-year-old Nandlall Mangal who pocketed $245.6 millionMy point is: there are success stories across the scope. The higher the level of risk, the fewer the number of people who've actually succeeded. And vice-versa- the lower the risk, the easier you get to sleep at night.
It comes down to the individual: How fast do you want your gains? What are you willing to put on the line? Some are comfortable with slow but sure gains. Others take more chances.
Fortune favours the bold.
Going back to my earlier position. When challenged to multiply $1000 into $100000, my choice could be to get into stocks. Would I succeed? Maybe, maybe not. Regardless, that's as much as my risk-tolerance will allow me.