wazua Tue, Jul 22, 2025
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

5 Pages«<345
SA: Seizing land from white farmers
hardwood
#81 Posted : Monday, April 09, 2018 8:08:27 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/28/2015
Posts: 9,562
Location: Rodi Kopany, Homa Bay
An African (a slave) taught Jack Daniels how to make whisky. We should all lift our Jack Daniels whisky glasses and toast to the African genius.

The lost story of the slave who taught Jack Daniel how to make whiskey:

hardwood
#82 Posted : Thursday, August 02, 2018 11:51:02 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/28/2015
Posts: 9,562
Location: Rodi Kopany, Homa Bay
SA to seize white farms without compensation. A 2017 South African government audit found white people owned 72 per cent of farmland.

https://www.theaustralia...928297e8df0fd88144d7cd7b
whiteowl
#83 Posted : Friday, August 03, 2018 7:20:23 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 4/16/2014
Posts: 1,420
Location: Bohemian Grove
One big problem with chasing out white farmers is that people will starve and the economy will suffer.One farm feeds an average of 2500 people.So every 400 farmers kicked out is 1 million people without food.They dont have any program for skill transfer so that guys "taking over" the farms will produce a similar output.Turning from a net exporter to importer of food overnight will hit their currency hard considering its already suffering.Trying to correct historical injustice is all good but people have to eat and also need a currency whose worth the paper its printed on.
hardwood
#84 Posted : Friday, August 03, 2018 9:07:59 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/28/2015
Posts: 9,562
Location: Rodi Kopany, Homa Bay
whiteowl wrote:
One big problem with chasing out white farmers is that people will starve and the economy will suffer.One farm feeds an average of 2500 people.So every 400 farmers kicked out is 1 million people without food.They dont have any program for skill transfer so that guys "taking over" the farms will produce a similar output.Turning from a net exporter to importer of food overnight will hit their currency hard considering its already suffering.Trying to correct historical injustice is all good but people have to eat and also need a currency whose worth the paper its printed on.


So are you suggesting that in kenya the white farmers should have retained their lands and africans should have continued being farmhands because one farm fed an average of 2500 kenyans and africans did not have farming skills?
hardwood
#85 Posted : Friday, August 03, 2018 9:24:51 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/28/2015
Posts: 9,562
Location: Rodi Kopany, Homa Bay
hardwood wrote:
whiteowl wrote:
One big problem with chasing out white farmers is that people will starve and the economy will suffer.One farm feeds an average of 2500 people.So every 400 farmers kicked out is 1 million people without food.They dont have any program for skill transfer so that guys "taking over" the farms will produce a similar output.Turning from a net exporter to importer of food overnight will hit their currency hard considering its already suffering.Trying to correct historical injustice is all good but people have to eat and also need a currency whose worth the paper its printed on.


So are you suggesting that in kenya the white farmers should have retained their lands and africans should have continued being farmhands because one farm fed an average of 2500 kenyans and africans did not have farming skills?


Do you know that 99% of the labour in those farms are africans who have farmed for ages and thus very well versed in agriculture. The problem with Zimbabwe is that farming was a white mans exclusive club where they controlled access to loans, machinery and markets. So when blacks were given 20 acres each and couldn't access money to even plough or get seeds, there was bound to be a reduction in production. Same as happened to kenya post independence when the big farms were subdivided and resettled by blacks, though in kenya the effect was minimal because a large number of Europeans still maintained their farms and also some of the farms were taken over intact by the black elites and continued with production.

So just know that after some time zimbabwe will recover. It's better when a black Zimbabwean owns his 20 acres and produces maize and tobacco to feed his family than when he is a farmhand/squatter producing the same maize and tobacco to enrich his white master while being paid slave wages and condemning his kids to perpetual "slavery".

As you can see from the graph below tobacco, the major export has nearly recovered to pre-land seizure days and most of the profits are going to the new black farmers. Also note that zimbabwe went down because the west deliberately sabotaged the economy to punish mugabe for kicking out their white brothers.

whiteowl
#86 Posted : Friday, August 03, 2018 9:36:35 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 4/16/2014
Posts: 1,420
Location: Bohemian Grove
hardwood wrote:
whiteowl wrote:
One big problem with chasing out white farmers is that people will starve and the economy will suffer.One farm feeds an average of 2500 people.So every 400 farmers kicked out is 1 million people without food.They dont have any program for skill transfer so that guys "taking over" the farms will produce a similar output.Turning from a net exporter to importer of food overnight will hit their currency hard considering its already suffering.Trying to correct historical injustice is all good but people have to eat and also need a currency whose worth the paper its printed on.


So are you suggesting that in kenya the white farmers should have retained their lands and africans should have continued being farmhands because one farm fed an average of 2500 kenyans and africans did not have farming skills?


Im suggesting you do it without crashing production and your currency.
hardwood
#87 Posted : Friday, August 03, 2018 9:49:02 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/28/2015
Posts: 9,562
Location: Rodi Kopany, Homa Bay
whiteowl wrote:
hardwood wrote:
whiteowl wrote:
One big problem with chasing out white farmers is that people will starve and the economy will suffer.One farm feeds an average of 2500 people.So every 400 farmers kicked out is 1 million people without food.They dont have any program for skill transfer so that guys "taking over" the farms will produce a similar output.Turning from a net exporter to importer of food overnight will hit their currency hard considering its already suffering.Trying to correct historical injustice is all good but people have to eat and also need a currency whose worth the paper its printed on.


So are you suggesting that in kenya the white farmers should have retained their lands and africans should have continued being farmhands because one farm fed an average of 2500 kenyans and africans did not have farming skills?


Im suggesting you do it without crashing production and your currency.


Of what use are "production and currency" matters to a black guy who is hungry, jobless and landless? Such maneno only matter to his white master whose grain or tobacco stores are full and the markets are strong.
whiteowl
#88 Posted : Friday, August 03, 2018 9:55:24 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 4/16/2014
Posts: 1,420
Location: Bohemian Grove
hardwood wrote:
whiteowl wrote:
hardwood wrote:
whiteowl wrote:
One big problem with chasing out white farmers is that people will starve and the economy will suffer.One farm feeds an average of 2500 people.So every 400 farmers kicked out is 1 million people without food.They dont have any program for skill transfer so that guys "taking over" the farms will produce a similar output.Turning from a net exporter to importer of food overnight will hit their currency hard considering its already suffering.Trying to correct historical injustice is all good but people have to eat and also need a currency whose worth the paper its printed on.


So are you suggesting that in kenya the white farmers should have retained their lands and africans should have continued being farmhands because one farm fed an average of 2500 kenyans and africans did not have farming skills?


Im suggesting you do it without crashing production and your currency.


Of what use are "production and currency" matters to a black guy who is hungry, jobless and landless? Such maneno only matter to his white master whose grain or tobacco stores are full and the markets are strong.


A sudden currency devaluation would hit low income earners the hardest.
hardwood
#89 Posted : Friday, August 03, 2018 10:00:47 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/28/2015
Posts: 9,562
Location: Rodi Kopany, Homa Bay
whiteowl wrote:
hardwood wrote:
whiteowl wrote:
hardwood wrote:
whiteowl wrote:
One big problem with chasing out white farmers is that people will starve and the economy will suffer.One farm feeds an average of 2500 people.So every 400 farmers kicked out is 1 million people without food.They dont have any program for skill transfer so that guys "taking over" the farms will produce a similar output.Turning from a net exporter to importer of food overnight will hit their currency hard considering its already suffering.Trying to correct historical injustice is all good but people have to eat and also need a currency whose worth the paper its printed on.


So are you suggesting that in kenya the white farmers should have retained their lands and africans should have continued being farmhands because one farm fed an average of 2500 kenyans and africans did not have farming skills?


Im suggesting you do it without crashing production and your currency.


Of what use are "production and currency" matters to a black guy who is hungry, jobless and landless? Such maneno only matter to his white master whose grain or tobacco stores are full and the markets are strong.


A sudden currency devaluation would hit low income earners the hardest.


You'd rather briefly suffer when you are on your own 20 acres than continue with the status-quo ie being landless and living in the townships/slums/farm-workers quarters with no hope for the future.
whiteowl
#90 Posted : Friday, August 03, 2018 10:11:18 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 4/16/2014
Posts: 1,420
Location: Bohemian Grove
hardwood wrote:
whiteowl wrote:
hardwood wrote:
whiteowl wrote:
hardwood wrote:
whiteowl wrote:
One big problem with chasing out white farmers is that people will starve and the economy will suffer.One farm feeds an average of 2500 people.So every 400 farmers kicked out is 1 million people without food.They dont have any program for skill transfer so that guys "taking over" the farms will produce a similar output.Turning from a net exporter to importer of food overnight will hit their currency hard considering its already suffering.Trying to correct historical injustice is all good but people have to eat and also need a currency whose worth the paper its printed on.


So are you suggesting that in kenya the white farmers should have retained their lands and africans should have continued being farmhands because one farm fed an average of 2500 kenyans and africans did not have farming skills?


Im suggesting you do it without crashing production and your currency.


Of what use are "production and currency" matters to a black guy who is hungry, jobless and landless? Such maneno only matter to his white master whose grain or tobacco stores are full and the markets are strong.


A sudden currency devaluation would hit low income earners the hardest.


You'd rather briefly suffer when you are on your own 20 acres than continue with the status-quo ie being landless and living in the townships/slums/farm-workers quarters with no hope for the future.


About that, who exactly gets the land and what size? Black "élites" or everybody?
masukuma
#91 Posted : Friday, August 03, 2018 11:26:51 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 10/4/2006
Posts: 13,822
Location: Nairobi
Watu hawajui AGRICULTURE IS A CULTURE... you don't come from a family of miners to do agriculture.
All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!
hardwood
#92 Posted : Friday, August 03, 2018 12:57:45 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/28/2015
Posts: 9,562
Location: Rodi Kopany, Homa Bay
whiteowl wrote:
hardwood wrote:
whiteowl wrote:
hardwood wrote:
whiteowl wrote:
hardwood wrote:
whiteowl wrote:
One big problem with chasing out white farmers is that people will starve and the economy will suffer.One farm feeds an average of 2500 people.So every 400 farmers kicked out is 1 million people without food.They dont have any program for skill transfer so that guys "taking over" the farms will produce a similar output.Turning from a net exporter to importer of food overnight will hit their currency hard considering its already suffering.Trying to correct historical injustice is all good but people have to eat and also need a currency whose worth the paper its printed on.


So are you suggesting that in kenya the white farmers should have retained their lands and africans should have continued being farmhands because one farm fed an average of 2500 kenyans and africans did not have farming skills?


Im suggesting you do it without crashing production and your currency.


Of what use are "production and currency" matters to a black guy who is hungry, jobless and landless? Such maneno only matter to his white master whose grain or tobacco stores are full and the markets are strong.


A sudden currency devaluation would hit low income earners the hardest.


You'd rather briefly suffer when you are on your own 20 acres than continue with the status-quo ie being landless and living in the townships/slums/farm-workers quarters with no hope for the future.


About that, who exactly gets the land and what size? Black "élites" or everybody?


In kenya who got the land?
hardwood
#93 Posted : Friday, August 03, 2018 1:07:51 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/28/2015
Posts: 9,562
Location: Rodi Kopany, Homa Bay
masukuma wrote:
Watu hawajui AGRICULTURE IS A CULTURE... you don't come from a family of miners to do agriculture.


The zulus and others were farming crops even before the mines were discovered. Agriculture also includes keeping animals and African communities always kept huge herds even before the white man came into the scene. There is no difference between a mzungu herder (he prefers to be called a "rancher") with 1000 animals and a zulu herder with his 1000 animals.

Oxford dictionary wrote:
Agriculture is the cultivation of land and breeding of animals and plants to provide food, fiber, medicinal plants and other products to sustain and enhance life.
tinker
#94 Posted : Friday, August 03, 2018 1:58:55 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 11/15/2010
Posts: 455
Location: Nairobi
hardwood wrote:
whiteowl wrote:
One big problem with chasing out white farmers is that people will starve and the economy will suffer.One farm feeds an average of 2500 people.So every 400 farmers kicked out is 1 million people without food.They dont have any program for skill transfer so that guys "taking over" the farms will produce a similar output.Turning from a net exporter to importer of food overnight will hit their currency hard considering its already suffering.Trying to correct historical injustice is all good but people have to eat and also need a currency whose worth the paper its printed on.


So are you suggesting that in kenya the white farmers should have retained their lands and africans should have continued being farmhands because one farm fed an average of 2500 kenyans and africans did not have farming skills?


By the way, the issue in Satafrika is about unoccupied land, more of what we call absentee land lord. This means the Boers will continue with their farming/production as is, may be minus the farmhand who will now be land owners as well.
....He who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion..
Baratang
#95 Posted : Friday, August 03, 2018 2:15:19 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 10/6/2009
Posts: 587
hardwood wrote:
masukuma wrote:
Watu hawajui AGRICULTURE IS A CULTURE... you don't come from a family of miners to do agriculture.


The zulus and others were farming crops even before the mines were discovered. Agriculture also includes keeping animals and African communities always kept huge herds even before the white man came into the scene. There is no difference between a mzungu herder (he prefers to be called a "rancher") with 1000 animals and a zulu herder with his 1000 animals.

Oxford dictionary wrote:
Agriculture is the cultivation of land and breeding of animals and plants to provide food, fiber, medicinal plants and other products to sustain and enhance life.


@hardwood..perhaps before telling us how great a farmers the black south Africans were and are, you might need to dig into the history of the four main communities (Zulu, Xhosa, Ngoni and the Khoi San (bushmen)) in South Africa just before 1450 AD. This might help you to correct your argument.smile
Obi 1 Kanobi
#96 Posted : Friday, August 03, 2018 5:23:36 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/23/2008
Posts: 3,017
Baratang wrote:
hardwood wrote:
masukuma wrote:
Watu hawajui AGRICULTURE IS A CULTURE... you don't come from a family of miners to do agriculture.


The zulus and others were farming crops even before the mines were discovered. Agriculture also includes keeping animals and African communities always kept huge herds even before the white man came into the scene. There is no difference between a mzungu herder (he prefers to be called a "rancher") with 1000 animals and a zulu herder with his 1000 animals.

Oxford dictionary wrote:
Agriculture is the cultivation of land and breeding of animals and plants to provide food, fiber, medicinal plants and other products to sustain and enhance life.


@hardwood..perhaps before telling us how great a farmers the black south Africans were and are, you might need to dig into the history of the four main communities (Zulu, Xhosa, Ngoni and the Khoi San (bushmen)) in South Africa just before 1450 AD. This might help you to correct your argument.smile


I am with Hardwood here, the issue of utilisation and productive use of land will come later, for now its about historical injustices, let those wazungu's migrate to Australia and Canada and settle there and grow those white economies, and let the south Africa be left to its original owners to do with as they please even if it means collapsing the economy.

The white farmers did not and will never give the 2,500 blacks food for free, the blacks have to buy and when you are not gainfully employed, then even the money to buy the food will not be available.
"The purpose of bureaucracy is to compensate for incompetence and lack of discipline." James Collins
Kusadikika
#97 Posted : Friday, August 03, 2018 6:13:35 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/22/2008
Posts: 2,716
It is not about doing a better job with the land. No!!! That cannot and should never be the point. Watu wapewe haki yao.

The situation in Namibia is even worse. There is a community of 30,000 Germans in Namibia who own 44% of the country. When Namibia got independence they were basically conned the way we were conned only worse because one of the clauses was that land is private, even water is private in Namibia. The black people own nothing at all there.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages«<345
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2025 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.