Only 5 countries world-wide have Kadhis courts through out their nation. I think I can remember India, Jordan, Kenya and some other 2. South African Muslims wanted Kadhi's courts in the draft but after negotiations they saw that the customary law section would fit them too. In Kenya, we had a problem when CoE (despite public outcry) refused to label Kadhi's courts as a contentious matter and thus open up discussion on it. Now see what we have in our hands.
In Tanganyika, we have everyone working under customary law (JALA) - as long as its not contrary to the constitution (rights are not withheld).
My point is: Kadhi's courts are very relevant to the Muslim faith and it would be totally uncouth and insensitive to ask them not to have them. I am told the cost of running the Nairobi Kadhi's courts is less than 100k a month (this is a sum SUPKEM or NAMLEF can cough-up) But as far as constitutional matters are concerned everyone can be fitted into Article 45(4), even if Kadhi's courts are mandated under the act of parliament to be set-up, thats OK. We do not have to constitutionalize it.
All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!