Apparently when the case was filed in 2004, It was shown on TV and the High court judges panel's make-up was not questioned then.
SUPKEM was served twice to appear in court and it ignored the service.
The AG kept on throwing spanners in the works by seeking adjournments that delayed the ruling.
The matter of whether they proceedings were actually to proceed was tackled (the Current constitution is silent on whether it is supreme and thus cannot be questioned contrary to the draft that has that in article 2(3)) and similar cases had by high courts in several countries was presented and the Judges in 2004 saw it fit to proceed with the case.
Please note it was brought to the court's knowledge that there are only 5 countries worldwide which have Kadhi's courts that adjudicated in the whole nation. The source of these contentious Kadhi's courts is Zanzibar and even there it is not in the whole of Tanzania.
So all these Lawyers and Would-be Lawyers you see falling over themselves saying the judgement is null and void were not present or choose to be absent from the court's proceedings.
All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!