spot on my guy

kadonye, a bit of reading what i have posted would have really been in order before you start quoting me and responding with your learned reading of philip ochieng. that post which you have just quoted should be read in context of my earlier post, to which the poster i had just responded to had questioned the relevance of the religion of the good judges.

if you were so bothered as to go back and read my original post in that matter, you should note that i had merely asked for those in the know to point me in the right direction on the religious inclinations of the said judges.

@nanfor. Christian colleges are not enshrined, in the constitution, and neither are they funded by the government. One can start a african traditional or an atheist college, and and you will not have broken any laws, as long as they are not government funded.

Masukuma, your point is valid.
However, the world we live in is NOT fair
Respected and retired Rev Njoya and Gitari are supporting the draft constitution. Their argument is "if you have two evils to choose from you choose the lesser evil" They are also christians like you are. You may choose to agree with them or otherwise.

Its your choice to take any stand, they call it "democracy" which in my opinion (sucks, for lack of a better word).

After the effects of 2007 elections, i resolved one thing. Never to participate in any goverment sponsored elections/petition or anything close to it. Because what any goverment wants, the goverment gets even if it means sacrificing some people to die.

Those so called principles are actualizing what they called "Agenda 4 of the Accord". They dont care wheather people are IDP's coz of voting for them. What's more important to them is the katiba, period.

That's what they'll get Aug 4.The new constitution will be there wheather you vote yes,no or abstain.Its the Govt project,with either hook or clook has to succed.

I am still waiting for the person who is going to explain to me how someone can come up with the notion that the constitution is illegal.

then under what authority is he sitting on the bench.

listen guys. I really care less about Kadhis courts or otherwise. I believe its a red herring.

What concerns me is seeing the judiciary being used here for ulterior motives based on law that doesn't exist.

In one stroke of the pen these 3 fools have decided that

1. It is illegal for the disabled to be given preferential treatment as it may offend the healthy,
2. It is illegal to have a certain number of women in parliament as it will offend men.
3. Affirmative action is illegal as I can hire my whole clan in my business.

As you are busy supporting this comical ruling, please sit down and consider its implications in your life.

it means that the court can decide anything in the old constitution is illegal. What makes you think that the next time you won't get 3 fundamentalist muslim judges who say that the God in our National Anthem should be changed to Allah since it annoys muslims.

These are the first judges in the whole world to declare a constittution illegal. Think about that.