wazua Fri, Nov 15, 2024
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

5 Pages<12345>
I am voting No
Wendz
#41 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:49:27 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/19/2008
Posts: 4,268
@Pastor M

mmmmmmh, got me thinking.... Are we not able to tolerate diverse views?.

Those voting for YES are supporting the proposed contitution which touches on thousands of issues, and are not advocating for abortion. To speak on my behalf, it is because i feel the constitution has alot more to offer on other governance issues which this country badly need and that can help us shape this nation than the value placed on controversies regarding abortion and kadhi courts. In any case, whether it is legalised or not, i will never perform it and i will teach my children what the will of God says in regard to life. Anyone securing an abortion needs more of spiritual guidance than law to govern her actions. The laws are secondary.
poundfoolish
#42 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:49:29 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 12/2/2009
Posts: 2,458
Location: Nairobi
Let us start this thing all over again from the top

Our main problem, our main challenge, that started this change the constitution crusade 20 years ago was because, immediately we crafted one in lancaster it was opened up to 'raping'.

please not nothing else was being changed in the draft apart from what concerns governance. single or multy party state, powers of the president, role of judiciary, Parliament and land.
the abuse of the system of government, led to offshoots e.g land grabbing and impunity.
Our problem all along was the structure of government (the executive, the judiciary, and parliament) with all powers having been vested in the executive.

We've had two chances to change this rot, the Bomas attempt and now this COE policy paper.

Now the COE did a good job trying to tame the structures of government. which was was the mandate given by the blood, toil and sweat shed most of the 20 years.
Problem is they went in and did an overhaul on everything, including things we didn't even need touched.

Have a closer look at the Preamble and the Bill of Rights and relate it to the rest of the chapters...
wanjirus
#43 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:50:24 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 8/4/2009
Posts: 37
I agree with @mozenrat,What's missing in the draft is just a more precise definition of a 'trained health professional',personally am voting yes at least I will have done something to improve from the current constitution, am for the idea that the valid contentious issues can be amended later, nothing is impossible, no one could predict a prime minister in the Kenyan government, this is a live document which is subject to changes at the interest of Kenyans.
AmHere
#44 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:51:39 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 7/7/2009
Posts: 93
"Abortion is illegal unless..."

Does this mean abortion is allowed or it is not? Hmmm. Sounds like the chicken and the egg problem.
Amurabi.
#45 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:56:06 AM
Rank: New-farer


Joined: 5/5/2010
Posts: 92
Untill i read both copies,understand them and know which one am voting for/against, will i make my contribution here. As at now am still burning the midnight oil and Pray Pray for divine interpretation. otherwise i will not listen to politians,lawyers,civic educators or even members of the cleargy. period.Sad Sad Sad
Some have been thought brave because they were afraid to run away.
kingfisher
#46 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:58:14 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 4/9/2008
Posts: 2,824
@Tebes.....read 41(2)d under labor relations section.

Show me in the bill of rights where that is being restricted!!

Unless members of disciplined forces are not workers, then they have the right to go on strike.
When I have money, I get rid of it quickly, lest it find a way into my heart.
newfarer
#47 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:00:37 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 3/19/2010
Posts: 3,504
Location: Uganda
IIEC

7th August 2010
Referendum results
60 yes
40 no

This Katiba will pass.

My concern is in regard to land .Minimum acreage. I have a house on 1/32 acre in Nairobi on share certificate, Can someone tell me if I will ever get a title deed on that house ama nitabaki squatter at the whims of the county ? then I can decide whether I fall in Yes or No
punda amecheka
Wendz
#48 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:09:14 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/19/2008
Posts: 4,268
Mostly, the minimum would be on agricultural land to enable proper planning and this is just a leeway for the future (my understanding). Minimum is not even our major problem right now.... Maximum is!!! Those grabbers must first return our land... then we can deal with minimum when we have land back to us! If we have the lot of land back, then minimum can come in later when we are 120million people and we need to concentrate people in towns for ease of distribution of resources and leave land for reasonable farming to feed that population. I think the intention was to avoid having houses on every piece of land and we lack anywhere to farm in future. Its the way they do it in more developed countries. People lease land to do commercial farming and seems thats where we are headed but that might not find us alive! at least most of those contributing to this post... hehehehehe...
chepkel
#49 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:15:46 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 4/6/2010
Posts: 741
Location: Nairobi
@Masukuma, i respect your democratic right. I was not pushing anything down your throat just contributing to the debate. I agree with Mpenzi, debate must be encouraged and When someone gives an opinion then others should take it or leave it and not get emotional and personal. please do not hate me if don't agree with you and i will respect your opinion too and in fact learn from it.

Actually, I have not decided whether i am voting No or Yes. I am still reading the document and trying to understand it. But the abortion thing doesn't do it for me
Tebes
#50 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:15:48 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 2,097
@Kingfisher

Exactly!!! Article 24(5) limits enjoyment of rights and freedom by members of Kenya Defence force and National Police service as outlined in Articles 31, 36, 37, 41, 43, 49. Article 24(5) has specifically spelt out these articles as a limitation to these category of persons!
"Never regret, if its good, its wonderful. If its bad, its experience."
Sigiriri
#51 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:22:55 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 6/26/2008
Posts: 319
@Nanfor - arguments presented here on abortion have merit, so please dont try to make others look foolish - abortion has not mentioned as legal, all we are saying is that the language allows too open a space as to actually permit abortion by backdoor. This was presented to the arrogant pple at CoE and they did not think it warranted attention - see now that it is becoming even more controversial than kadhi's courts.

And can someone please tell the yes sayers to quit saying that kadhi's courts are in the current constitution - and using this to reject the argument of the clergy and the rest of us. I have not written this out yet, but there are differences that make the proposed implementation worse - and the current katiba therefore is a better bet. Ideally, we dont need these courts at all in the constitution. A statute at parliament level is a sure and fitting solution.

NO!
nanfor1
#52 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:24:51 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 11/30/2009
Posts: 141
newfarer

you should definately vote Yes if your issue is land.

Let me give an example. You all know who owned the land from githurai to thika.

If their original leases were 999 years, they can sell a lease to you for 99 years and lower. so when you buy the property, you own it for that time.

it immediately reverts to the original owner of 999 years. In other words, you will build property on their land and get nothing in return. Guess who remains richer?

the land clause is one of the best land clauses in the world. Please take your time and read it. It would be a very sad thing to revert to the present land laws in Kenya. Please I urge you again, ask a valuer or a land planner if you know one what it means to you. There is no space in this forum to do so.
Hata wakizima taa
nanfor1
#53 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:30:19 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 11/30/2009
Posts: 141
@sigigiri

I am not against those against the clause. But I am very scared of those that say reject it because of that clause. Yet they are lying about its intepretation.

yes sigigiri. I have come to the conclusion that they are deliberatly lying. So sue me.

I would rather issues, real issues such as the ones that kingfisher and new farer are coming up with. Those are the real governance issues in Kenya, not some red herring upus about a clause that says something totally different.

the clergy has become a two trick pony and they want to drag the rest of us into their persistent misery.
Hata wakizima taa
newfarer
#54 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:32:26 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 3/19/2010
Posts: 3,504
Location: Uganda
Nanfor thanksApplause Applause .I hope the Parliament will legislate a law specifying whether the minimum clause applies to Urban areas and the minimum acreage for urban and rural areas.
punda amecheka
famooz
#55 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:40:43 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 11/19/2007
Posts: 2,047
First it seems to me that the No camp is gaining momentum...

I also get the feeling that many people( in both camps) do NOT know how the Katiba will fundamentally change anything!!!! esp. for those who are saying it is better than the old,yet can't list one thing that is better...if i am not wrong we will still have a powerful presidency.....etc etc........someone who is well versed with the 2 documents could take this debate to the next level( i am not,i will not pretend to be) i just think this is still hewa moto!
poundfoolish
#56 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:43:30 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 12/2/2009
Posts: 2,458
Location: Nairobi
Gentlemen poking holes on governance and land and anything related to that are besides the shorcomings of this draft..
The COE did a perfect job on that area...

The main concerns are that this draft lacks as former LSK chairman Ahmednasir, is a Kenyan blue print, our values and chore beliefs.

eg
Sec 32 (2) "Every person has the right, either individually or in community withothers, in public or in private, to manifest any religion or belief throughworship, practice, teaching or observance, including observance of aday of worship.

and this
Chapter 1
article 2
(5) The general rules of international law shall form part of the law of Kenya.

(6) Any treaty or convention ratified by Kenya shall form part of the law of Kenya under this Constitution.
kingfisher
#57 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:47:20 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 4/9/2008
Posts: 2,824
@tebes....if that is the case, i may then be having a bad copy
When I have money, I get rid of it quickly, lest it find a way into my heart.
Soko tele
#58 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:48:21 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 8/19/2008
Posts: 60
The land commission is empowered to investigate historical land issues,so if someone was evicted by wabeberu and then that land bought by someone else after independence and has used the title as security, what will happen.............

This commission will for sure open a can of worms
Soko tele
#59 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:53:27 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 8/19/2008
Posts: 60
about the structure of government;

The senate should have been a more powerful house than national assembly. As it is now , its only meant to protect the counties but on national issues its a toothless entity.
poundfoolish
#60 Posted : Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:55:58 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 12/2/2009
Posts: 2,458
Location: Nairobi
On land
there wil be a minimum..
theres no point to keep subdividing land that is already too small amongst your numerous sons.. as somebody put by the generation there will be nothing to own there but a 'rumour of land'.

So yes! there will be minimums land but categorised..In cities you could get a title deed for your house no matter the size it occupies.. but in rural area that are now densely populated..possibilities of being clamped into residential areas, leaving the rest for farming are high.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (4)
5 Pages<12345>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2024 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.