If Tilapia is the only fish you have eaten - then it's the tastiest fish in the world. in a world full of close to 30,000 species of fish... this is really not true . The truth is that the first fish you eat will be the tastiest fish in the world and the second fish you eat 'may' displace it. If you continue eating different fish you are bound to get to a fish that displaces the first fish you ate as the 'tastiest' fish. if you continue eating fish you will continue stumbling on tastier fish than your hitherto "tastiest fish ever eaten" and you will need to stop at some time - what is the best time to stop? well - according to "algorithms to live by" when you hit 37%... so until you have eaten 11,100 species of fish - you cannot claim any of the fish is the tastiest in the world.

So back to Tilapia... apparently it's not that great...

Quote:

When it comes to fish, no species brings out the haters like tilapia.

Read up on it, and you’ll find tilapia described with words like “muddy” and “earthy”; there are entire forum threads devoted to its inferiority. This very newspaper, back in 2007, called it “the fish that chefs love to hate.”

P.S... this is strictly for fish (ichthyes)...if it's fish zile za @Swenani - you can only declare when you have sampled 1 billion fishes

you are falling behind!! you will need to eat upwards of 2,284 fish (without reeating any) an hour for the next 50 years if you are to authoritatively make that claim.

the math is clear... you and the queen need to have eaten at least 11,100 species of fish to make that claim!

But even cost wise it is not as cheap....and also health-wise..e.t.c, let's use value per gramme as a measure, Mt. Kenya trout beat others! Even for thinking!